Tobias Frost writes: > Am Samstag, den 28.02.2015, 12:16 +1100 schrieb Riley Baird: .. > should fix them, also please read https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide > -- you definitly need to separate upstream source and debian packaging; > don't ship a debian dir in the tarball.
Ok, thanks a million for your good comments Tobias and Riley, there seems to be things that did not cross my mind yet .. :) But, before attempting to address the listed problems I'd like to get clarification on a few unclear items: - Mixing OpenSSL with LGPL is ok and requires no license-statement acrobatics? While I'm the upstream, switching the license from GPL to LGPL is possible and would also suit well together with the fact that the text editor code from Nokia is in LGPL too.. - ..about the debian directory in the tarball: as it is handy to have the build-related items in same version control with the sw what do people normally do? Maybe rename the directory "debian" to something else and the re-re-name when it is actually needed? Or just delete directory from the tarball, making it impossible to simply fetch latest .tar.gz from version control to be treated as "original sources"? - The Lenin photograph, according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspaper#mediaviewer/File:Lenin_reading_Pravda.gif is by Pyotr Otsup who was not credited in copyright. The file is in the public domain in most countries yes, but is it still a problem to have it included, if there is some imaginary country that for instance grants eternal copyright to every graphical item? - Supposing I can somehow fix the pending problems, what should I do next after that? dput yet another version and make a notice about that in comments of this bug #779377 or maybe file another bug report or what? Thanks for your patience, -- Antti Järvinen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/21745.56341.680811.785...@muikku.katiska.org
