Hi Sebastiaan, all,
Last night, netCDF 4.3.3-rc3 was released [1] with 4.3.3 to be
expected very soon. I've been working on getting it to build with
Debian for a while now (mostly pushing things upstream), and I'm
thinking we're in a good shape right now.
I'd be great if you could have a look at
On 01/15/2015 09:52 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Hi Sebastiaan, all,
>
> Last night, netCDF 4.3.3-rc3 was released [1] with 4.3.3 to be
> expected very soon. I've been working on getting it to build with
> Debian for a while now (mostly pushing things upstream), and I'm
> thinking we're in a good sh
Hi Nico,
On 01/15/2015 09:52 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> I'd be great if you could have a look at the branch `split-c-f-cxx` on
> alioth to see if there are any obvious shortcomings. If we can fix
> those, we should be finally able to upgrade from the several years old
> 4.1.3.
I only find netCDF
> that you still have local changes not pushed to Alioth?
Right; fixed now.
–Nico
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
> Hi Nico,
>
> On 01/15/2015 09:52 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
>> I'd be great if you could have a look at the branch `split-c-f-cxx` on
>> alioth to see
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "apulse"
* Package name: apulse
Version : 0.1.5-1
Upstream Author : Rinat Ibragimov
* URL : https://github.com/i-rinat/apulse
* License : BSD
S
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bitfighter"
* Package name: bitfighter
Version : 019d-2
Upstream Author : Chris Eykamp
* URL : http://bitfi
On 01/15/2015 07:57 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
>> that you still have local changes not pushed to Alioth?
>
> Right; fixed now.
Thanks for the push!
Can you also update the pristine-tar branch with your upstream tarballs
as imported into the upstream branch?
I've push some changes on the split-c-
retitle 775284 RFS: linuxptp/1.5-2
thanks
I just uploaded a new revision. The package is now blhc and lintian
clean even with --pedantic, except for the missing upstream changelog
which is really missing in the upstream source.
Regards,
Tino
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:05:42 +0100, Mateusz Łukasik wrote:
> apulse - PulseAudio emulation for ALSA
> libapulse - PulseAudio emulation for ALSA - the libapulse libraries
> libapulse-dev - PulseAudio emulation for ALSA - the libapulse devel
> libraries
Hey, this is nice :)
But there's
9 matches
Mail list logo