Hi,
I'm currently packaging GMastermind for Debian. In the process, it has
been discovered that, according to a technical reading of the README,
GMastermind is licensed under GPL-2 only (i.e. without "or, at your
option, any later version").
However, according to the headers on the source files,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 04:06:16AM +, T o n g wrote:
> >>> dh_install(1) is a program, not a target.
> >>>
> install -m 755 ddclient \ $(DESTDIR)/usr/sbin/ddclient
>
> install -D -m 755 debian/ddclient.NetworkManager \
> $(DESTDIR)/etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/50-ddclie
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 04:17:51AM +, T o n g wrote:
> dh_install(1) is a program, not a target.
>
> > install -m 755 ddclient \ $(DESTDIR)/usr/sbin/ddclient
> >
> > install -D -m 755 debian/ddclient.NetworkManager \
> > $(DESTDIR)/etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/50-
> Well, it could be argued if this little notice in README carries more
> legal weight than the intent expressed in the source files (the notice
> does not follow the recommended form and gpl.txt is missing)...
>
> We (pkg-gnustep) had an inititive 6 or 7 years ago to re-check the
> licenses of al
Riley Baird wrote:
> If you're worried about the incompatibility between LGPL3 and GPL2,
> you don't have to be. gmastermind.app is only linking to the LGPL3
> libraries, so the copyleft doesn't apply to it (because of the
> linking exemption).
You are very wrong here. A GPLv2-only program cannot
On 14/07/14 19:45, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Riley Baird wrote:
>> If you're worried about the incompatibility between LGPL3 and GPL2,
>> you don't have to be. gmastermind.app is only linking to the LGPL3
>> libraries, so the copyleft doesn't apply to it (because of the
>> linking exemption).
>
> You
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mosquitto". This upload
fixes an RC bug that upstream have fixed in a new release. I have also
uploaded a fix to mentors for the same bug to the current packaged
version (1.2.1), but would p
Hei,
"To build your own package, simply run debuild from inside the source
tree. dpkg-buildpackage(1) options may be given on the command line.
The typical command line options to build only the binary package(s)
without signing the .changes file (or the non-existent .dsc file):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/14/2014 12:56 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:31 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
>> I don't remember reading an explanation of how to do this in the
>> New Maintainers' Guide or similar documentation, and I don't see an
>> obvious w
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:59 PM, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to separate gpg signing from package building?
>
> As I'm still trying to learn Debian package building, I've found myself
> fallen into this silly loop many times -- Thinking that the package would
> be fine, I build it wit
Hi Luis!
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Luis Ángel San Martín Rodríguez <
luisange...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if anyone is interested in maintain the .deb package
> for YACReader (www.yacreader.com). Right now, and thanks to a
> contributor, the project has a beta packa
>> Please, Mentors, help me with these unlying questions.
>> - should libquazip be build inside debian using Qt5 and/or Qt4?
>
>Both. for now.
Ok. How can I manage this? Is it possible inside one unique source
package? Debhelper does only have a qmake_qt4 buildsystem.
Or should I create a duplica
On 2014-07-14, Eric Maeker wrote:
>>> Please, Mentors, help me with these unlying questions.
>>> - should libquazip be build inside debian using Qt5 and/or Qt4?
>>
>>Both. for now.
>
> Ok. How can I manage this? Is it possible inside one unique source
> package? Debhelper does only have a qmake_qt
Hi,
On 14/07/14 15:07, Eric Maeker wrote:
>>> Please, Mentors, help me with these unlying questions.
>>> - should libquazip be build inside debian using Qt5 and/or Qt4?
>>
>> Both. for now.
>
> Ok. How can I manage this? Is it possible inside one unique source
> package? Debhelper does only have
Thanks for the feedback, I've uploaded 0.6.1 with an extra depends.
I've checked in a vm without e17 installed this time to make sure it works
first.
If you'd be so kind as to check the new version and let me know?
http://mentors.debian.net/package/terminology
The respective dsc file can be found
is somebody working on node-webkit packaging?
https://github.com/rogerwang/node-webkit
--
Fernando Toledo
Dock Sud BBS
http://bbs.docksud.com.ar
telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
On 07/14/2014 08:26 PM, Fernando Toledo wrote:
> is somebody working on node-webkit packaging?
> https://github.com/rogerwang/node-webkit
>
Couldn't see it here:
https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/prospective
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi Asheesh,
thank you very much for your help.
You have probably missed the part where Felix said: "I have no problem
building these packages and providing some support, but ideally this
position should be filled by someone actually running a .deb based linux
distribution (he uses Arch linux), so
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 04:27:40PM +0100, bofh80 wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback, I've uploaded 0.6.1 with an extra depends.
> I've checked in a vm without e17 installed this time to make sure it works
> first.
> If you'd be so kind as to check the new version and let me know?
The new version app
Hi Mentors,
I've updated the libquazip package so that it builds a dual qt version
of the library: Qt4 and Qt5. I still have to include the -dbg package
may be using override_dh_strip (it's in progress).
The source package builds without any error with a debian sid pbuilder
base (pbuilder --distr
Hi Fernando,
AFAIK nobody in JavaScript Team is working on.
Consider to join us[0] if you want to package it.
Cheers!
Leo.
[0] - https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
Hello List !
It seems that the SourceForge watch redirector for tth [1] does not update
properly:
since a couple of weeks the latest upstream version of tth at SourceForge [2]
has not been noticed.
In short I am stuck, but I want to step forward: any idea ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
[1] https:
Hi...
This bug is certainly starting to cause problems...
On 15 July 2014 01:35:46 BST, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>Hello List !
>
>It seems that the SourceForge watch redirector for tth [1] does not
>update properly:
>since a couple of weeks the latest upstream version of tth at
>SourceForge [2] ha
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> Only advice I can give you can find in
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2014/07/msg00153.html
Negotiations with sourceforge are continuing but it looks like we may
have to adopt the RSS based redirector code.
--
bye,
pabs
https
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jul 2014 04:24:02 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: vmtouch/0.8-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #739484,
regarding RFS: vmtouch/0.8-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jul 2014 04:24:04 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: ngp/0.1-2.0 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #739178,
regarding RFS: ngp/0.1-2.0 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jul 2014 04:24:02 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #740032,
regarding RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Hi
I'm working on gatejs which is a reverse & forward proxy made using
javascript (nodejs).
It is under the GPLv3
We would like to port it for Debian. Is there someone to help me to do
that ?
https://github.com/binarysec/gate
https://github.com/binarysec/gateGhost
Thanks in advance
Michael
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Michael Vergoz wrote:
> We would like to port it for Debian. Is there someone to help me to do that?
First read through Debian's guide for upstream projects and make any
changes needed:
https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
Then read through our introduction to
>
>
> >The new version appears to work for me.
>
Thanks very much for testing it again.
>
> >By the way, do you happen to know if terminology is supposed to replace
> >eterm, or are both going to live together?
They are certainly not the same thing, i'll simply put in the lead
enlightenment devs
30 matches
Mail list logo
