Bug#720924: RFS: spotweb/20130826+dfsg-1~pre6 [RC]

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Jan-Pascal, The package you've prepared looks really good overall, good job! Just a few nitpicks: Must-haves: debian/copyright: - missing license entry for images/ttf/liberation-sans/* (even if you don't ship the embedded font files, if they're in the source tarball

Bug#732234: RFS: libgringotts/1:1.2.1-13 [RC]

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 confirmed Hi Jose, I just wanted to say that the changes look ok; I was going to upload it, but for some reason my latest uploads seem to have vanished into thin air. I've tried both ftp, and ssh via ssh.upload.debian.org, but I don't get any acknowledgement back, which is weird,

Bug#699723: RFS: podget/0.6.10-1

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Dave, Your package (podget) doesn't seem to be available on mentors anymore. You'll need to re-upload it if you're still looking for a review + sponsorship. Sorry for the inconvenience! Regards, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debia

Bug#726325: marked as done (subtitlecomposer/0.5.3-4 [RC] -- Subtitles editor for KDE)

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:57:01 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: subtitlecomposer/0.5.3-4 [RC] -- Subtitles editor for KDE has caused the Debian Bug report #726325, regarding subtitlecomposer/0.5.3-4 [RC] -- Subtitles editor for KDE to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#720924: RFS: spotweb/20130826+dfsg-1~pre6 [RC]

2014-01-17 Thread Jan-Pascal van Best
Hi Vincent, Thank you for your review! debian/copyright: - missing license entry for images/ttf/liberation-sans/* (even if you don't ship the embedded font files, if they're in the source tarball, they need to be acknowledged in debian/copyright) Thanks for spotting this. An earlier version if

Bug#720924: RFS: spotweb/20130826+dfsg-1~pre6 [RC]

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > Thank you for your review! > > >> debian/copyright: >> - missing license entry for images/ttf/liberation-sans/* (even if you >> don't ship the embedded font files, if they're in the source tarball, >> they need to be ac

Bug#732234: marked as done (RFS: libgringotts/1:1.2.1-13 [RC])

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 01:46:27 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: libgringotts/1:1.2.1-13 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #732234, regarding RFS: libgringotts/1:1.2.1-13 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#725447: marked as done (RFS: task-spooler/0.7.4-1)

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 02:26:39 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #725447, regarding RFS: task-spooler/0.7.4-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#728105: RFS: libharu/2.2.1-2

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Johan, Your package mostly looks good, but in debian/changelog you claim that you've fixed #727409 by running autoreconf, but that's not the case. In addition to adding a build-dep on dh-autoreconf, you also need the following in debian/rules: %: dh $@ --with auto

Bug#725623: marked as done (RFS: wuzzah/0.53-3 [ITA])

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 02:44:41 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: wuzzah/0.53-3 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #725623, regarding RFS: wuzzah/0.53-3 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#726950: marked as done (RFS: pidgin-privacy-please/0.7.1-2)

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 02:59:04 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: pidgin-privacy-please/0.7.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #726950, regarding RFS: pidgin-privacy-please/0.7.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#735130: RFS: libapr-memcache/0.7.0-2

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi, Err, "Multi-Arch: off" isn't valid. I'm going to assume that was a silly typo and what you really meant was "Multi-Arch: same", but in case you're not quite sure, I recommend referring to the Debian wiki [1]. Don't forget to test your package by building it in a clea

Bug#728510: marked as done (RFS: secpanel/1:0.6.1-2)

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:12:11 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: secpanel/1:0.6.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #728510, regarding RFS: secpanel/1:0.6.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#731466: marked as done (RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6)

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:15:06 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #728758, regarding RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#728758: marked as done (RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6)

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:15:06 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #728758, regarding RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#720924: RFS: spotweb/20130826+dfsg-1~pre6 [RC]

2014-01-17 Thread Jan-Pascal van Best
Hi Vincent, Thanks for the quick response! I've uploaded a new version (20130826+dfsg2-1) to mentors, and also pushed to Alioth git. Jan-Pascal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Ar

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > > Dear mentors, > > I repackaged the gnome-shell-pomodoro to support gnome-shell-3.8 (to > work with unstable). > > I am now looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-pomodoro" >

Bug#734996: marked as done (RFS: lwatch/0.6.2-1)

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:45:56 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: lwatch/0.6.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #734996, regarding RFS: lwatch/0.6.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#735565: marked as done (RFS: couriergrey/0.3.2-5)

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:53:01 + with message-id <20140117115301.gs8...@riva.ucam.org> and subject line Re: (fwd) Processing of couriergrey_0.3.2-5_i386.changes [ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org] has caused the Debian Bug report #735565, regarding RFS: couriergrey/0.3.2-5 to be ma

Bug#720924: marked as done (RFS: spotweb/20130826+dfsg-1~pre6 [RC])

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:54:13 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: spotweb/20130826+dfsg-1~pre6 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #720924, regarding RFS: spotweb/20130826+dfsg-1~pre6 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#732188: marked as done (RFS: freedict -- free bilingual dictionary databases)

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:04:58 +0100 with message-id <1389963898.19874.102.ca...@karaba.cepremap.org> and subject line Re: Bug#732188: RFS: freedict -- free bilingual dictionary databases has caused the Debian Bug report #732188, regarding RFS: freedict -- free bilingual dictionary d

Bug#735685: RFS: libnftables/0.0.0~20131209-1 [ITP]

2014-01-17 Thread Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libnftables" * Package name: libnftables Version : 0.0.0~20131209-1 Upstream Author : Pableo Neira Ayuso * URL : http://netfilter.org/projects/nftables/index.htm

Bug#735685: RFS: libnftables/0.0.0~20131209-1 [ITP]

2014-01-17 Thread Neutron Soutmun
Hello, I have no right to upload, but I'm interested in "nftables" also. therefore, I have both dget and git clone your source package for testing and reviewing. Below is my review. * debian/control: + could bump the standards-version to 3.9.5 as lintian has warned right now. (found a rever

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-17 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Vincent, Thanks for the suggestion for the usage of the Breaks keyword. I personally prefer to do as the gnome-shell-extensions do which is adding "gnome-shell (>= 3.8), gnome-shell (<< 3.9)" to the package. I'll update the package accordingly for the next release. For the integration of the g

Bug#735772: RFS: sockjs-client/0.3.4-1 [ITP #733821]

2014-01-17 Thread Tonnerre LOMBARD
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sockjs-client" * Package name: sockjs-client Version : 0.3.4-1 Upstream Author : VMware, Inc., Guillermo Rauch , Julian Aubourg , Douglas Crockford * URL : http

Bug#735685: RFS: libnftables/0.0.0~20131209-1 [ITP]

2014-01-17 Thread Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
On 17 January 2014 17:59, Neutron Soutmun wrote: > Hello, > > I have no right to upload, but I'm interested in "nftables" also. > therefore, I have both dget and git clone your source package for > testing and reviewing. > > Below is my review. > Thanks you for the review! Some comments below.

Bug#735685: RFS: libnftables/0.0.0~20131209-1 [ITP]

2014-01-17 Thread Neutron Soutmun
Hello, On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 3:15 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On 17 January 2014 17:59, Neutron Soutmun wrote: >> * debian/copyright: >> + forgot the debian/* license > > isn't needed, since 3.9.3. I'm not quite sure that the policy said "isn't needed" as 12.5 `debian/copyright' i

Bug#724927: RFS: qgis/2.0.1-1

2014-01-17 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Followup-For: Bug #724927 Dear mentors, Following the recent OpenSceneGraph and osgEarth uploads, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qgis" Package name: qgis Version : 2.0.1-1 Upstream Author : qgis-develo...@lists.osgeo.org URL :

Bug#735772: RFS: sockjs-client/0.3.4-1 [ITP #733821]

2014-01-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/18/2014 03:02 AM, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sockjs-client" > > * Package name: sockjs-client > Version : 0.3.4-1 > Upstream Author : VMware, Inc., Guillermo R

Bug#735772: RFS: sockjs-client/0.3.4-1 [ITP #733821]

2014-01-17 Thread Tonnerre LOMBARD
Salut, On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:21:11AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > The package seems to be in order, however, you are packaging > LICENSE-MIT-SockJS, which you shouldn't. All of the copyright > information should be contained in debian/copyright and no other file. > > If you fix that, I'll

Bug#735605: marked as done (RFS: osgearth/2.4.0+dfsg-6)

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Jan 2014 04:24:52 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: osgearth/2.4.0+dfsg-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #735605, regarding RFS: osgearth/2.4.0+dfsg-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#735175: marked as done (RFS: checkbox-support/0.1-1 [ITP] -- CheckBox support python3 library)

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Jan 2014 04:24:52 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: checkbox-support/0.1-1 [ITP] -- CheckBox support python3 library has caused the Debian Bug report #735175, regarding RFS: checkbox-support/0.1-1 [ITP] -- CheckBox support python3 library to be marked

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Joseph Herlant wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > Thanks for the suggestion for the usage of the Breaks keyword. I personally > prefer to do as the gnome-shell-extensions do which is adding "gnome-shell > (>= 3.8), gnome-shell (<< 3.9)" to the packa

Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi, Would you consider changing the name of the source package back to zeroinstall-injector? This won't impact end users (the binary package is 0install now; that's what end users will see, and that's what they'd install), but it makes this transition less of a hassle if

Bug#733022: RFS: arnu/1.0-2 [ITP]

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi, Please have a look at the lintian issues pointed out on your package's mentors.d.n page [1], and fix them. If you have questions about any specific lintian warning, you can use `lintian-info -t $WARNING` to look up the full description, or just ask on debian-mentors.

Bug#723582: RFS: metar/0.2-1

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Just a quick ping...have we reached a consensus on whether this package is needed in Debian, or is more or less the same as "metar" which is already in the archive (in which case we can close this bug report)? Regards, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors

Bug#728715: marked as done (RFS: xlsxwriter/0.4.6-1 [ITP])

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 23:07:14 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: xlsxwriter/0.5.2-1 [ITP] -- A Python module for creating Excel XLSX files has caused the Debian Bug report #728715, regarding RFS: xlsxwriter/0.4.6-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#731337: marked as done (RFS: xlsxwriter/0.5.1-1 [ITP])

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 23:07:14 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: xlsxwriter/0.5.2-1 [ITP] -- A Python module for creating Excel XLSX files has caused the Debian Bug report #728715, regarding RFS: xlsxwriter/0.5.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#735444: marked as done (RFS: xlsxwriter/0.5.2-1 [ITP] -- A Python module for creating Excel XLSX files)

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 23:07:14 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: xlsxwriter/0.5.2-1 [ITP] -- A Python module for creating Excel XLSX files has caused the Debian Bug report #728715, regarding RFS: xlsxwriter/0.5.2-1 [ITP] -- A Python module for creating Excel XLSX fil

Bug#731341: marked as done (RFS: xlsxwriter/0.5.1-1 [ITP])

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 23:07:14 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: xlsxwriter/0.5.2-1 [ITP] -- A Python module for creating Excel XLSX files has caused the Debian Bug report #728715, regarding RFS: xlsxwriter/0.5.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#720627: marked as done (RFS: pyresample 1.0.0)

2014-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2014 23:17:29 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: pyresample 1.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #720627, regarding RFS: pyresample 1.0.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#728889: RFS: stx-btree/0.9-1

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi, Your package embeds a copy of jquery; if possible, you should depend on libjs-jquery and replace the embedded copy with a symlink to debian's jquery. It looks like the documentation can be built from source using doxygen, so please generate the docs at build time. L

Bug#734456: RFS: stockfish/4+dd-1 -- new version

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Just making a note here on #734456 that Rodrigo already pinged me on IRC asking for stockfish to be sponsored, but I declined due to the fact that this would be a hostile NMU. AFAIK, Rodrigo is currently talking to the MIA team asking for the package to be orphaned, so thi