On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 20:52:48 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>> >> I: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: missing-debian-source-format
>> > That's your main problem. Without debian/source/format assumed format
>> > is 1.0 which means both no tar.bz2 support and possibility of making
>> > the package
Hi,
Quoting T o n g (2013-07-08 14:15:37)
> On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 20:52:48 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> >> >> I: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: missing-debian-source-format
> >> > That's your main problem. Without debian/source/format assumed format
> >> > is 1.0 which means both no tar.bz
Package: sponsorship-requests
everity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ethstatus"
* Package name: ethstatus
Version : 0.4.4
Upstream Author : Debian Native
* URL : none found
* License : GPL Version 2
Section
> Quoting T o n g (2013-07-08 14:15:37)
> > On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 20:52:48 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> >
> > >> >> I: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: missing-debian-source-format
> > >> > That's your main problem. Without debian/source/format assumed format
> > >> > is 1.0 which means both no
Quoting Tong Sun (2013-07-08 16:38:07)
[...]
> What buried in my original question was "So do you think unpacking
> upstream tarball then repack it and name it as
> libpam-ssh-agent_0.9.5.orig.tar.gz would solve the problem?"
> By repacking, I did mean repack it properly, i.e., changing the
> forma
Hi!
While working on the new mpich package, I am experiencing some problems
related to doc-base and gzipped PDF files. There are three such files,
but I'll focus on one of them to explain the problem.
The mpich-doc package contains /usr/share/doc/install.pdf.gz, which is
an installation guid
Hello,
On 08/07/13 17:01, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While working on the new mpich package, I am experiencing some problems
> related to doc-base and gzipped PDF files. There are three such files, but
> I'll focus on one of them to explain the problem.
>
> The mpich-doc packa
On 08/07/13 17:10, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello,
On 08/07/13 17:01, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
Hi!
While working on the new mpich package, I am experiencing some problems related
to doc-base and gzipped PDF files. There are three such files, but I'll focus
on one of them to explain the
Greetings,
I am new to the Debian community but have been using Debian for a while
now. I am hoping to get involved but would like to start out very simple.
I have read through a good deal of information on the website and would
like to try maintaining a simple package. Is there someone that
Hello Again,
On 08/07/13 17:34, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
> On 08/07/13 17:10, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 08/07/13 17:01, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> While working on the new mpich package, I am experiencing some problems
>>> related to doc-base and gzip
Hi Dominique,
Welcome.
If you search the archives of debian-mentors, you'll see this question
gets asked every so often and is usually answered with a nice list of
things to read and places to start. So I'd suggest performing a
search.
For a quick hit, Google for "WNPP Debian".
Cheers,
-mz
On
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> Hi Dominique,
>
> Welcome.
>
> If you search the archives of debian-mentors, you'll see this question
> gets asked every so often and is usually answered with a nice list of
> things to read and places to start. So I'd suggest performing a
Hello,
You have not described your interest ortechnical background, which renders it somewhat difficult to guess what you are up to. I suggest you join one of the packaging groups, like pkg-java, Debian Med or Debian Science, and find a package that just needs an update. Then ask the respectiv
Your message dated Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:23:31 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: monit/1:5.5.1-1~bpo60+1 -- utility for monitoring
and managing daemons or similar programs
has caused the Debian Bug report #714404,
regarding RFS: monit/1:5.5.1-1~bpo60+1 -- utility for monitoring an
Hi,
I'm trying to fix the following issues:
W: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
W: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.9.5-2
I don't want to do a NMU because there hasn't been a Debian package for it
before. The problem is, the upst
On 2013-07-08 21:04, Tong Sun wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> I'm trying to fix the following issues:
>
> W: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
> W: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number
> 0.9.5-2
>
> I don't want to do a NMU because there hasn't
Hello all,
Sorry i changed my mind due to some reason related.
i am not looking for a sponsor for package ethstatus.
Thanks,
/Jeffrin
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hello all,
Sorry i changed my mind due to some reason related.
i am not looking for a sponsor for package ethstatus.
Thanks,
/Jeffrin
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 06:08:24PM +0200, Julian Wollrath wrote:
> > nearly a month passed, since I asked for sponsorship for the new
> > powertop package [0] and addressed the concerns which Paul Wise had
> > with it. Sadly Patrick Winnertz, the maintainer, did not react and I
>
> When you clai
Hi Andreas,
We have a prototype available at http://greenhouse-daveeloo.dotcloud.com/.
To login you have to be part of the Greenhouse team on Launchpad, which can
be joined here: https://launchpad.net/~greenhouse (we are only using
Launchpad temporarily for the prototype because the original Ubunt
Hi,
I'm trying to fix the following lintian problems:
W: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: ancient-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is
3.9.4)
but googling on "source: ancient-standards-version" didn't give me much helpful
answer.
How should I fix the problem?
Detailed help appreciated.
Thank
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:55:31 -0700, Tong Sun wrote:
> I'm trying to fix the following lintian problems:
>
> W: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: ancient-standards-version 3.8.0 (current
> is 3.9.4)
>
> but googling on "source: ancient-standards-version" didn't give me much
> helpful answer.
Ru
Your message dated Tue, 09 Jul 2013 04:23:15 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: ethstatus/0.4.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #715372,
regarding RFS: ethstatus/0.4.4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 12:04:28PM -0700, Tong Sun wrote:
> However, the upstream chose to put 0.9.5-1 in the changelog file,
You shouldn't care about changelog entries added by the upstream.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 02:55:31PM -0700, Tong Sun wrote:
> I'm trying to fix the following lintian problems:
>
> W: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: ancient-standards-version 3.8.0 (current
> is 3.9.4)
>
> but googling on "source: ancient-standards-version" didn't give me much
> helpful answer.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Tong Sun wrote:
> but googling on "source: ancient-standards-version" didn't give me much
> helpful answer.
The first result is the lintian info for this warning:
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/ancient-standards-version.html
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 11:37:25AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 12:04:28PM -0700, Tong Sun wrote:
> > However, the upstream chose to put 0.9.5-1 in the changelog file,
> You shouldn't care about changelog entries added by the upstream.
Yet having two versions of the
27 matches
Mail list logo
