Hello,
I am Emmanouil Kiagias a Debian gsoc student and my mentor is Andreas
Tille. The gsoc project goal is to redesign the metapackage creation for
Debian Blends [1].
I am bringing up a question to this list from the blends-list [2] . We
actually want to achieve architecture dependent metapacka
* Grzegorz Niewisiewicz , 2013-06-25, 00:34:
If Lintian was a bit smarter, it would also emit
hyphen-used-as-minus-sign for this line:
.RI [ -c ] " file" ...
Fixed. What about the header? Currently it reads:
bats \- Bash Automated Test Suite
Do we want a hyphen or a minus here?
Keep "\-"
Hello
I'd like to point out that releases of xnoise never require vala for
building because the release contains the C sources!
Usual configure-make-makeinstall works without vala.
bug #705677 should not be a blocker for this ITP bug.
Regards
Jörn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-
On 06/25/2013 14:35, shuerhaaken wrote:
> I'd like to point out that releases of xnoise never require vala for
> building because the release contains the C sources!
>
> Usual configure-make-makeinstall works without vala.
Generated files aren't source (as in "preferred form of modification").
It
Hi Anton,
I finally got around to looking at the package again.
Currently getsource doesn't run due to some minor upstream format change.
Can you fix that?
I fixed the first bug it runs into. It still doesn't seem to work, though.
No idea what is missing.
Yes, but in the previous uploade
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ipmiutil", which is a new package.
See Bug #650323 RFP also.
* Package name: ipmiutil
Version : 2.9.2
Upstream Author : Andy Cress
* URL : http://ipmiutil.so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
recently I received the bug report below. The problem for the FTBFS is, that
gwyddion currently seems to not include libgtk2.0-dev (which contains the
missing header file gdkgc.h) correctly. Gwyddion correctly Build-Depends:
on libtgtk2.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> You put dh_python3 call in such a place, that is run when .deb has already
> been created. No wonder it's a no-op that late. :P
>
>>
That's where some googling told me to put it. Location fixed and now it
works. Thanks.
> Filing a wishlist b
Hi Jan,
On 25-06-13 21:44, Jan Beyer wrote:
> recently I received the bug report below. The problem for the FTBFS is, that
> gwyddion currently seems to not include libgtk2.0-dev (which contains the
> missing header file gdkgc.h) correctly. Gwyddion correctly Build-Depends:
> on libtgtk2.0-dev, bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
Und es begab sich am 25.06.2013 22:18, dass Paul Gevers schrieb:
> ...
>> I uploaded more recent versions to experimental during the last
>> freeze. What is the policy on getting the latest version from
>> experimental to unstable? Just chang
Control: noowner -1
It turns out that I won't have time to tackle this ITP. I'm sorry.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130625215140
On 06/25/2013 01:58 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>>> Why does it need such a new version of coreutils? (This, on the
>>> other hand, might be something worth explaining in the
>>> changelog.) This build-dependency makes the package unbuildable
>>> on i386, which is stuck with an earlier version of coreuti
Grzegorz Niewisiewicz writes:
> OK, so I'll change to "optional".
> BTW: what kind of packages should be classified as "extra"?
The distinction between optional and extra is basically pointless these
days. That said, I usually classify packages as extra if they are
particularly obscure, if the
Hi Jakub,
Please see below...
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Robinson Sathaseevan , 2013-06-19, 22:43:
>
> 1. I'm packaging and testing in wheezy, do I have to be using sid?
>>
>
> Yes, you should be build and test your packages in unstable.
>
>
Switched to unstable.
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 23:47:13 +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>> mk-build-deps is one of the usual way to do this.
>
> sure. I know that. I just don't understand why that suggestion wasn't in
> the first message. If you're going to go to the trouble of replying to a
> question on the mentors mailing
Hi,
The Debian package that I'm trying to create is libpam-ssh-agent
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595817
I need it to rsync files that belong to root between two systems as a
normal unprivileged user, without specifying password (the root account
is locked on both of system
T o n g writes:
> I've successfully built a package, the building and installation was
> fine. The problem is that when people use Debian packages, they tend to
> assume that the package will work out of the box, whereas this pam-ssh-
> agent-auth PAM module need a bit of post-install configurati
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jun 2013 04:23:22 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: rspamd/0.5.4-1 [ITP] -- rapid spam filtering
system
has caused the Debian Bug report #700040,
regarding RFS: rspamd/0.5.4-1 [ITP] -- rapid spam filtering system
to be marked as done.
This means that
18 matches
Mail list logo
