Hi Anton,
I finally got around to looking at the package again.
Currently getsource doesn't run due to some minor upstream format change.
Can you fix that?
I fixed the first bug it runs into. It still doesn't seem to work, though.
No idea what is missing.
Yes, but in the previous uploaded version there are in "patch-section"
only Makefile, badpixels and manpages. You have now also configure,
Makefile.in etc.
That's a thing that I still don't understand. In an AutoTools environment
all you need is configure.in and Makefile.in. The files configure and
Makefile are then created automatically. However when I remove configure
and Makefile from the patch, nothing is built at all.
Please, add into the patch only Makefile and badpixels. Manpages can be stored
somewhere in debian-directory (debian/manpages, for example).
All non-upstream manpages are in debian/manpages now.
I have now uploaded dcraw-9.17-1.1, which contains all my fixes and
cleanups in a single changelog entry.
Ok, looks good. Please, clean patches,
see above: The manpages have been removed, but configure and Makefile are still
there.
try to fix watch-file,
Beyond my time/skill resources. Besides, the getsource script is not a real
watch file.
use DEP-5 for
copyright,
The standard says this is optional.
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
check README.debian (update or remove it, if the info is outdated),
Done.
use dcraw.manpages and dcraw.exapmles instead of putting them into the
override_*.
I don't understand what you mean here.
Best,
Oliver
Thanks for your work,
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51c9ab59.4040...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de
