Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:
name: v3c
version: 2.4.0-01
upstream url: http://sourceforge.net/projects/v3c/
dsc file: http://sourceforge.net/projects/v3c/files/debian/
license: LGPLv3
short description: v3c utility toolkit
section: devel
git repo: git://v3
Hi,
when finally trying to close #638170 of sofaframework I was running into
another problem with building this package. The compilation breaks
with:
g++ -c -m64 -pipe -W -I/usr/include/libxml2 -O2 -O1 -D_REENTRANT -fPIC
-DQT_WEBKIT -DSOFA_QT4 -DSOFA_GUI_QTVIEWER -DSOFA_GUI_GLUT -DSOFA_HAVE_PNG
Le 13 déc. 2011 à 09:51, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> /usr/include/qwt
Does Qwt project installed on the machine ?
-
Eric Maeker, MD (Fr)
http://www.freemedforms.com
http://www.ericmaeker.fr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Hi Eric,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:28:03AM +0100, Eric MAEKER wrote:
> Le 13 déc. 2011 à 09:51, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> > /usr/include/qwt
>
> Does Qwt project installed on the machine ?
Sure. This is guaranted by the Build-Depends (and if not the build
would stop way earlier).
Kind reg
Is there an #include for the header file defining QwtData in
GraphDataWidget.cpp?
Regards, Daniel
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:54:22 +0100
> Von: Andreas Tille
> An: Eric MAEKER
> CC: Debian Mentors List , Debian Med Project
> List
> Betreff: Re: Problem c
Le 13 déc. 2011 à 10:54, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:28:03AM +0100, Eric MAEKER wrote:
>> Le 13 déc. 2011 à 09:51, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>>
>>> /usr/include/qwt
>>
>> Does Qwt project installed on the machine ?
>
> Sure. This is guaranted by the Build-D
* Thomas Weber [111212 22:29]:
> The problem is really that
> "debian/rules clean" doesn't give the same as "dpkg-source -x".
>
> As far as I understand Stefano in
> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org/msg22803.html,
> I have no guarantee that a buildd will actually run
* Andrew Shadura , 2011-12-13, 08:41:
What is the correct way to remove an entire directory and it's
contained files with a quilt patch?
Why not do that in debian/rules ?
So you would patch the one file that needs patching, and remove the
whole directory from debian/rules, am I following you ri
Hi,
today I found three packages with an uninstallable build dependency.
The missing dependency is because of a name change. And the
package blocking the others with transitioning itself has open RC bugs.
What is the right thing to do? Writing patches/preparing NMUs for three
packages or fixing
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qastools".
* Package name: qastools
Version : 0.16.0-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds those binary pa
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:18:31 -0500
Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> After talking with Github, it's indeed the case where this package
> will be deprecated before it's of use to anyone.
>
> I'm no longer seeking it's upload. Thanks!
>
Ah, I was looking for a github cli client and was interested in th
Hi Sebastian,
Sebastian H. wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qastools".
>
> * Package name: qastools
>Version : 0.16.0-1
>Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
> * URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
> * License : GPL-3
>Section
Hi Benoît
> Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
> better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
> improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
> the choice. But maybe I'm missing something.
The short answer is, it makes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/12/2011 04:03 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Stephen M. Webb" writes:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package update for
>> "scorched3d". This updated fixes a FTBFS and closes RC bug
>> #650579.
>
> Your package reverts an earlier
Sebastian H. wrote:
> > Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
> > better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
> > improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
> > the choice. But maybe I'm missing something.
>
> The short
Sebastian H. wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qastools".
>
> * Package name: qastools
>Version : 0.16.0-1
>Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
> * URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
> * License : GPL-3
>Section : sound
>
>
>>> Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
>>> better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
>>> improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
>>> the choice. But maybe I'm missing something.
>>
>> The short answer is, it mak
Hi Philip,
Philip Ashmore wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:
>
> name: v3c
> version: 2.4.0-01
> upstream url: http://sourceforge.net/projects/v3c/
> dsc file: http://sourceforge.net/projects/v3c/files/debian/
Where are v3c_2.4.0-01.orig.tar.gz and v3c_2.4.0-01-1.debi
Sebastian H. wrote:
> >>> Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
> >>> better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
> >>> improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
> >>> the choice. But maybe I'm missing something.
> >>
>
> Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
> better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
> improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
> the choice. But maybe I'm missing something.
The short answe
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:10 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Quoting "anatoly techtonik" :
>
>> What does this testing implies? If there is a reference document on
>> testing - somebody else may do this. This doc should exists even just
>> to tell which parts can possibly go wrong as well as histor
On 2011-12-13, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> Sebastian H. wrote:
>> > Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
>> > better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
>> > improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
>> > the choice. But
On 13/12/11 16:51, Benoît Knecht wrote:
Hi Philip,
Philip Ashmore wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:
name: v3c
version: 2.4.0-01
upstream url: http://sourceforge.net/projects/v3c/
dsc file: http://sourceforge.net/projects/v3c/files/debian/
Where are v3c_2.4.0-01.orig
Sebastian H. wrote:
> > Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
> > better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
> > improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
> > the choice. But maybe I'm missing something
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2011-12-13, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> > Sebastian H. wrote:
> >> > Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
> >> > better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
> >> > improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giv
Philip Ashmore wrote:
> I've successfully generated a secret key with a pass phrase and
> added a sub key for encryption,
> by following http://keyring.debian.org/creating-key.html
> I signed the .dsc and .changes file.
> I created an account at mentors.debian.net and created ~/.dput.cf as
> specif
2011/12/13 Paul Tagliamonte :
> perhaps something like (with dh short syntax):
>
> override_dh_auto_build:
> rm -rf ./cruddy/folder
> dh_auto_build $(FLAGS_IF_ANY)
I've added the following:
override_dh_auto_build:
rm -rf nautilus_image_manipulator/upload/poster
dh_auto_build
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Emilien Klein wrote:
> 2011/12/13 Paul Tagliamonte :
>> perhaps something like (with dh short syntax):
>>
>> override_dh_auto_build:
>> rm -rf ./cruddy/folder
>> dh_auto_build $(FLAGS_IF_ANY)
>
> I've added the following:
> override_dh_auto_build:
> rm
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Emilien Klein
> wrote:
>> 2011/12/13 Paul Tagliamonte :
>>> perhaps something like (with dh short syntax):
>>>
>>> override_dh_auto_build:
>>> rm -rf ./cruddy/folder
>>> dh_auto_build $(FLAGS_IF_ANY
On 13/12/11 20:58, Benoît Knecht wrote:
Philip Ashmore wrote:
I've successfully generated a secret key with a pass phrase and
added a sub key for encryption,
by following http://keyring.debian.org/creating-key.html
I signed the .dsc and .changes file.
I created an account at mentors.debian.net a
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libqglviewer".
Package is already available in Debian:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libq/libqglviewer.html
I need the sponsorship because new binary package with documentation
is introduced and as a DM I have no privileges to upload to NEW queue.
* Philip Ashmore [111214 00:08]:
> I've filed an ITP against WNPP for this package.
>
> I've also uploaded my packages to mentors.debian.net.
>
> The dsc file is:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/v3c/v3c_2.4.0-01-1.dsc
>
> Regards,
> Philip Ashmore
Hello,
I am not a DD so I can'
Philip Ashmore wrote:
> On 13/12/11 20:58, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> >Philip Ashmore wrote:
> >>I've successfully generated a secret key with a pass phrase and
> >>added a sub key for encryption,
> >>by following http://keyring.debian.org/creating-key.html
> >>I signed the .dsc and .changes file.
> >>
Hello,
I have a new version of this package ready for review.
I believe I have addressed all of the review comments from last
time around.
I have also tried to address the question "what does wader-core
do that modem manager cannot" with a comment in #492875.
Additionally, the expanded descripti
34 matches
Mail list logo
