Re: adding --distribution experimental to pdebuild

2011-02-10 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 09:12:21PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2011, 11:15 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: > > hi, > > > > I am trying to rebuild a package using another package that is > > located in experimental. I have a pbuilder sid installation and I > > thought I

RFS: blast (updated package)

2011-02-10 Thread randall
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-22.1 of my package "blast". It builds these binary packages: blast - Blow holes in window of programs The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 608316 The package can be found on mentors.debia

Re: RFS: blast (updated package)

2011-02-10 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Randall, randall wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-22.1 > of my package "blast". > > It builds these binary packages: > blast - Blow holes in window of programs > > The package appears to be lintian clean. Just a quick comment: your changelog entry is one year

Re: RFS: blast (updated package)

2011-02-10 Thread randall
On 02/10/2011 10:44 AM, Benoît Knecht wrote: > Hi Randall, > > randall wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-22.1 >> of my package "blast". >> >> It builds these binary packages: >> blast - Blow holes in window of programs >> >> The package appears to be lintian clean.

Re: RFS: blast (updated package)

2011-02-10 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:04 PM, randall wrote: > will make an update, noticed that all changelog dates are up to the > second, figured that would indicate an automated way of setting the date > or is it just a matter of precise manual timing? sudo apt-get install devscripts ; dch -r -- bye, p

Re: RFS: blast (updated package)

2011-02-10 Thread Benoît Knecht
randall wrote: > On 02/10/2011 10:44 AM, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > Just a quick comment: your changelog entry is one year in the past: > > > > Wed, 09 Feb 2010 03:07:13 +0100 > > > > I didn't have a look at the rest of the package yet, but I'll let you > > know if I notice any issue. > > > > Ch

Re: RFS: libchart-php

2011-02-10 Thread Benoît Knecht
Daniel Lombraña González wrote: > 2011/2/8 Benoît Knecht : > > Lintian reports a few issues that you should address: > > > >  W: libchart-php source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is > > 3.9.1) > >  I: libchart-php: description-synopsis-might-not-be-phrased-properly > >  I: libchart

Re: RFS: Cool Reader

2011-02-10 Thread Rogério Brito
Dear Vadim, On 02/02/2011 07:33 AM, bugg...@fromru.com wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cr3" (Cool Reader 3). > > Package name: cr3 > Version : 3.0.43-2 > License : GPL You should state the version of the GPL that you are using. > It builds these bin

RFS: pencil

2011-02-10 Thread David Rios
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pencil". * Package name: pencil Version : 1.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Evolus * URL : http://pencil.evolus.vn/ * License : GPL version 2 Section : graphics It builds these binary packages: pencil

Re: RFS: libchart-php

2011-02-10 Thread Daniel Lombraña González
Hi, 2011/2/10 Benoît Knecht : > Daniel Lombraña González wrote: >> 2011/2/8 Benoît Knecht : >> > Lintian reports a few issues that you should address: >> > >> >  W: libchart-php source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is >> > 3.9.1) >> >  I: libchart-php: description-synopsis-might-n

RFS: ulatencyd - Daemon to minimize latency on a linux system using cgroups

2011-02-10 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ulatencyd". * Package name: ulatencyd Version : 0.4.5-1 Upstream Author : Daniel Poelzleithner * URL : https://github.com/poelzi/ulatencyd * License : GPL-3+ Section : utils It builds these bi

Re: RFS: pencil

2011-02-10 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, David, thanks for your interest in Debian. I am not a DD, but I will try to give you some comments on your package. 1) orig.tar.gz should contain the folder pencil-1.2.0/, and there should be all other files. All of your files are in "root" of the tarball. 2) lintian over your .dsc file with

Fwd: openscenegraph_2.9.11-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2011-02-10 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hello, I have a question regarding the attached e-mail, which I think it's appropriate to ask here. I got this email because it's a new package, or what? This is about the package OpenSceneGraph and I have "DMUA" permission: http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openscenegraph.html The binary files

Re: Fwd: openscenegraph_2.9.11-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2011-02-10 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 06:53:22PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > Reject Reasons: > manuel.montez...@gmail.com may not upload NEW file > libopenthreads14_2.9.11-1_amd64.deb > manuel.montez...@gmail.com may not upload NEW file > libopenscenegraph71_2.9.11-1_amd64.deb These two bina

Re: RFS: tomb

2011-02-10 Thread Jaromil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 hi Benoît, thanks for your review! i've packed a new upstream version of tomb and packaged it with some mentored corrections. it is now lintian clean and can be attained from http://apt.dyne.org/debian deb http://apt.dyne.org/debian stable main

Re: RFS: python-gearman

2011-02-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Oxan, On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 16:08, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote: > Hi, > > On 08-02-11 15:51, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> >> Sorry I didn't noticed first: you can remove also "XB-Python-Version: >> ${python:Versions}" from d/control > > I've removed the XB-Python-Version from d/control. Just out of curio

Re: RFS: daisy-player (next try, new upstream version)

2011-02-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Thanks for testing the package. > I've got another problem. When trying to run daisy-player after > installation on Debian/testing, I get: > > (C)2003-2011 J. Lemmens > Daisy-player - Version 6.1.1 > A parser to play Daisy CD's with Linux > play FAIL formats: no handler for file extension `mp3' >

Re: RFS: blast (updated package)

2011-02-10 Thread Benoît Knecht
Benoît Knecht wrote: > I didn't have a look at the rest of the package yet, but I'll let you > know if I notice any issue. Actually, I see now that the only change was to transfer maintenance over to you, so I guess there's no need for further review. Maybe you could just make sure that it's compi

Re: RFS: libchart-php

2011-02-10 Thread Benoît Knecht
Daniel Lombraña González wrote: > > You should document the changes introduced by > > debian/patches/debian-changes-1.2.2-1, and avoid creating example files > > in that patch (simply put the files somewhere in debian/, and install > > them from there). Also, make sure you forward those changes ups