Re: New upstream version

Hi, thanks for the hint to debian-mentors. So I add that list and attach the original mail to that mail. I set also a reply-to for debian-mentors und myself (I am not subscribed to debian-mentor 'til now). I left also debian-devel to show where the follow up is going on. (Urgh, NNTP is that better

RFS: gnurobbo (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.62-1 of my package "gnurobbo". It builds these binary packages: gnurobbo - logic game ported from ATARI XE/XL The package appears to be lintian clean, except in pedantic mode where there’s a warning about the binary being included

RFS: gnurobbo (updated package)

This time with the correct address for the devel-games list... - Forwarded message from Stephen Kitt - > Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:06:07 +0100 > From: Stephen Kitt > To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, debian-ga...@lists.debian.org > Subject: RFS: gnurobbo (updated package) > Message-I

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.38

Reijo Tomperi wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cppcheck". * Package name: cppcheck Version : 1.25-1 Upstream Authors: Daniel Marjamäki Reijo Tomperi * URL : http://cppcheck.wiki.sourceforge.net/ * License : GP

Re: Using ccache with sbuild/schroot

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 05:09:36PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 08:07:04AM -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:59:03AM -0400, Ryan Kavanagh wrote: > > > Hi list, > > > Has anybody setup ccache in an LVM schroot for sbuild and if so, how? My > > > blocking

Re: RFS: gnurobbo (updated package)

Stephen Kitt wrote: > This time with the correct address for the devel-games list... > > - Forwarded message from Stephen Kitt - > >> Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:06:07 +0100 >> From: Stephen Kitt >> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, debian-ga...@lists.debian.org >> Subject: RFS: gnurob

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.38

> Reijo Tomperi wrote: --cut-- > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.38-1.dsc > > The upload would fix these bugs: > #550793 false positive resource leak Uploaded. Thanks! -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org

RFS: wokkel

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wokkel". * Package name: wokkel Version : 0.6.3-1 Upstream Author : Ralph Meijer * URL : http://wokkel.ik.nu/ * License : MIT Section : python It builds these binary packages: python-wokkel -

Re: RFS: jigzo (updated package)

Elías Alejandro wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.1-4 > of my package "jigzo". > > It builds these binary packages: > jigzo - Photo puzzle game for children > jigzo-data - data of Photo puzzle game for children > > The package appears to be lintia

Re: RFS: hwinfo (updated package)

William Vera wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 16.0-2 > of my package "hwinfo". > > It builds these binary packages: > hwinfo - Hardware identification system > libhd-dev - Hardware identification system library and headers > libhd-doc - Hardware iden

Re: RFS: sniffit (updated package)

William Vera wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.7.beta-15 > of my package "sniffit". > > It builds these binary packages: > sniffit- packet sniffer and monitoring tool > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs

RFS: imagination (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.1-1 of my package "imagination". It builds these binary packages: imagination - DVD slide show maker imagination-common - DVD slide show maker - common files The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs:

RFS: spacenavd

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spacenavd". * Package name: spacenavd Version : 0.4-1 Upstream Author : John Tsiombikas * URL : http://spacenav.sourceforge.net/index.html * License : GPL Section : utils It builds these binar

request for review: lbzip2-0.16-1

Dear Mentors, I kindly request you to review lbzip2-0.16-1: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lbzip2 Changes: lbzip2 (0.16-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release: - handle signals and problems with input/output files more gracefully, - close standard output

RFS: scrot (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8-11 of my package "scrot". It builds these binary packages: scrot - command line screen capture utility The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 547486, 549123 The package can be found on ment

Re: request for review: lbzip2-0.16-1

Hi lacos, > I kindly request you to review lbzip2-0.16-1: Just a comment... > W: lbzip2: latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-version > 0.16rc1 precedes 0.16 chronologicallly. You should have used something like 0.16~rc1 for the previous release. See the --compare-versions option in dpkg f