Re: RFS: mupen64plus

[Sven Eckelmann, 2009-06-14] > On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 05:13:31 -0700 Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > > > * can you do with lzma something similar to you did with bz2 and zlib? > > > No, not at the moment. The lzma-dev doesn't provide a shared object. I > > > changed > > > it now to link against the static

Re: RFS: mupen64plus tinc-interface

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:33:01 -0700 Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > a good reason to disable that patch right now. Maybe there is a little bit > > confusion about lzma/lzma-dev/liblzma/libxz/7z. > > when 111-system-unlzma.patch is enabled, I'm getting segmentation fault > every time I try to start the

Re: RFS: qutecsound (2nd try)

Hello, On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 14:29, Felipe Sateler wrote: > El domingo 14 de junio, LI Daobing escribió: >> Hello, >> >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:37, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> > El sábado 13 de junio, LI Daobing escribió: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 16:15, LI Daobing wrote:

RFS: kabikaboo

Hi Debian, I am looking to add my little program into Debian. It is a simple, but unique, text editor. I created it to help people write novels. I am a little overwhelmed by this big Debian ecosystem but eager to learn. Here are the package details: 1. Name: kabikaboo 2. License: GNU GPL

Re: RFS: kabikaboo

Hi, > Why it should be in Debian: there are ~ a hundred text editors, but none > of them are like this, at least not that I know of. I personally > couldn't write my novel without it - that's why I made it! :) > > cheers > Dave > > > PS. I hope everything is in order here, but if not, please let

Re: RFS: mupen64plus

uploaded -- http://people.debian.org/~piotr/sponsor signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: kabikaboo (lintian)

Hi George, thanks for the help. I fixed these: W: kabikaboo: readme-debian-contains-debmake-template W: kabikaboo: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate W: kabikaboo: copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate E: kabikaboo: description-starts-with-package-name W: kabikaboo: e

Re: RFS: kabikaboo (lintian)

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Dave Kerr wrote: > However I am unsure how to fix these two: > W: kabikaboo: new-package-should-close-itp-bug > W: kabikaboo: wrong-bug-number-in-closes l3:# > > Could you give me some guidance on "new-package-should-close-itp-bug" > and "wrong-bug-number-in-cl

Re: RFS: kabikaboo (lintian)

Hi Dave On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:45:08PM -0600, Dave Kerr wrote: > Could you give me some guidance on "new-package-should-close-itp-bug" > and "wrong-bug-number-in-closes l3:#"? I read the documentation but > I'm unclear if I can submit a bug against my package if the package > isn't submit

RFS: partlibrary (QA Upload)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.1.2.8-1-1 of the package "partlibrary". It is orphaned and I don't intend to adopt it. Because of the relatively high popcon I've prepared a QA upload with the current upstream version. It builds these binary packages: partlibrary - E

Re: RFS: partlibrary (QA Upload)

Hi, On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > The package appears to be lintian clean. You could still add a watch file, and it would also be trivial to fix at least one of the pedantic warnings here by adding the Homepage field in debian/control. By the way, here's a working watch

RFS: libslf4j-java (updated package)

Dear mentors and java maintainers, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.8-1 of package "libslf4j-java". It builds these binary packages: libslf4j-java - Simple Logging Facade for Java The package is lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - http://mentors.de

Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009/6/13 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. : > The (unversioned, build-time use only) symlink libiulib.so -> > libiulib.so.0.0.0 needs to be in libiulib-dev package.  The (major- > versioned) symlink libiulib.so.0 -> libiulib.so.0.0.0 needs to be in the > libuilib0 package. Thanks for this. I have now uplo

Re: RFS: partlibrary (QA Upload) [updated]

Hi Daniel, On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:21:36PM -0700, Daniel Moerner wrote: > You could still add a watch file, and it would also be trivial to fix > at least one of the pedantic warnings here by adding the Homepage > field in debian/control. You're absolutely right. I was working on a different p

Re: RFS: libslf4j-java (updated package)

Hi Damien, On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.8-1 > of package "libslf4j-java". unfortunately java-gcj-compat-dev is still broken: . Someone needs to fix this bu

Re: RFS: libslf4j-java (updated package)

Le lundi 15 juin 2009 22:54:33, Torsten Werner a écrit : > Hi Damien, Hi Torsten, > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Damien > > Raude-Morvan wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.8-1 > > of package "libslf4j-java". > > unfortunately java-gcj-compat-dev is still broken: >

Re: FYI: QA uploads primer

Thanks for the feedback Sandro. I've written the primer for technical-minded debian users that (a) want to contribute to debian, but are uncertain about their long-term time-commitment; and (b) given their uncertain commitment, won't read the whole policy, devref, and newmaint guide just for the sa

RFS: libspring-2.5-java

Dear mentors and java maintainers, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libspring-2.5-java". * Package name: libspring-2.5-java Version : 2.5.6.SEC01-1 Upstream Author : SpringSource Inc. * URL : http://www.springsource.org/ * License : Apache 2.0 Secti

Re: RFS: libslf4j-java (updated package)

Le lundi 15 juin 2009 23:23:34, Vincent Fourmond a écrit : > Hello Damien ! > > Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > Concerning my RFS, should we stop uploading new packages revisions until > > some fix java-gcj-compat-dev ? > > If it FTBS in a chroot, sure enough: uploaders can't build... Pwned! I

Re: FYI: QA uploads primer

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 23:00, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > Thanks for the feedback Sandro. I've written the primer for technical-minded > debian users that (a) want to contribute to debian, but are uncertain about > their long-term time-commitment; and (b) given their uncertain commitment, > won't

Re: FYI: QA uploads primer

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:01:30AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 23:00, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback Sandro. I've written the primer for technical-minded > > debian users that (a) want to contribute to debian, but are uncertain about > > their long-ter

Re: FYI: QA uploads primer

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:53:32AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:01:30AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 23:00, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > > > Thanks for the feedback Sandro. I've written the primer for > > > technical-minded > > > debian user

Re: RFS: qutecsound (2nd try)

El lunes 15 de junio, LI Daobing escribió: > Hello, > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 14:29, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > El domingo 14 de junio, LI Daobing escribió: > >> Hello, > >> > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:37, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> > El sábado 13 de junio, LI Daobing escribió: > >> >> Hello,

Re: FYI: QA uploads primer

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 00:53, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > There's a tradeoff: encouraging potential new contributors (in the hope that and do you think you're in position to take this tradeoff? I don't think so. > they'll eventually read all the docs) at the cost of initially lower-quality > RFS