Hello Jonathan,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 03:15, Jonathan Wiltshire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> there is a config.log file left in diff.gz, please remove it in the
>> >> next upload (probably before the 'rm' in config), but apart from that
>> >> the package looks fine so I uploaded it.
>
> Fixe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michal Čihař a écrit :
> Hi
>
> Most of things were already answered in Matthews reply, I only react on
> missing things.
>
> Dne Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:14:56 +0100
> Laurent Guignard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
>
>>> - debian/rules:
>>>
>>> - rm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Matthew Palmer a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:14:56PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote:
>> Michal ??iha?? a écrit :
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Quick look at the package:
>>>
>>> - any reason why it is Architecture: i386?
>>
>> In reason of
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inkscape-textext".
* Package name: inkscape-textext
Version : 0.4.4-1
* Upstream Author : Pauli Virtanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.elisanet.fi/ptvirtan/software/textext/
* License : BSD
Secti
Salvatore Bonaccorso scrisse:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inkscape-textext".
>
> inkscape-textext - Inkscape extension for editable LaTeX text or
> formula
I'm not really in favor of this ITP, as it mainly seems as a
wring reaction to the latex extension not wo
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:37:25 +0100
Laurent Guignard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I thought it was a cleaner method to test the file exists before
> >> running a command on, but may be i am wrong ?
> >
> > The test is okay, but why do you invoke debian/rules? If you need
> > config.status to be
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:37:48 +0100
Laurent Guignard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have another question about architecture :
> How is it possible to check if a package could be built on
> architecture without the appropriate hardware ?
As long as all the dependencies exist on all the available
a
Dear Luca
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 03:18:43PM +0100, Luca Bruno wrote:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso scrisse:
>
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inkscape-textext".
> >
> > inkscape-textext - Inkscape extension for editable LaTeX text or
> > formula
>
> I'm not really
[ Please reply to -mentors at least ]
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:37 PM, S'orlok Reaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have split libwaitzar off from scim-waitzar and built a separate package:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-waitzar/
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 21:31 +0200, George Danchev wrote:
> On Monday 24 November 2008 17:27:16 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Change: added patch 05_segfault_params.dpatch and included it in
> > 00list.
> > Closes: LP #301041
>
> Helping Ubuntu folks is also very nice, and to be honest I was not aw
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "librcd".
Package name: librcd
Version : 0.1.11-2
Upstream Author : Suren A. Chilingaryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://rusxmms.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL
Section : libs
It builds these binary
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "librcc".
Package name: librcc
Version : 0.2.6-2
Upstream Author : Suren A. Chilingaryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://rusxmms.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL
Section : libs
It builds these binary p
Hi,
2008/11/27 Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
[...]
>>>
>>> debian/uupdate-wrapper:
>>>
| gzip > xinha_$version.orig.tar.gz
>>> use max compression (a.k.a -9)
>> Done
>
> But looks like you didn't re-compress the tarball using -9, please do.
it is done now. But doesn't save
Salvatore Bonaccorso scrisse:
> First, before I also answer to your other paragraphs: do you think,
> there is a "change" that the patch found in launchpad bugtracker (See
> Bugreport #506285) can go into the inkscape package? This will render
> back again the LaTeX formula rendering for 0.46 agai
I'm no legal genius, but it looks fairly benign. Basically it says, "as
long as you give us credit for the code, you can do whatever you want
with it".
- Lawrence
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask if a software that contains a file with this:
--
Hi altogether!
[...snip...]
> > I'm not really in favor of this ITP, as it mainly seems as a
> > wring reaction to the latex extension not working properly.
>
> Many thanks for your reaction on this! Indeed yes, you are right, it
> was a porbably to fast reaction. I will so the sponsoring request
из того что вижу при проверке:
1. на все новые пакеты должны быть написаны ITP, тебе явно lintian ругается
на это:
* Initial release (Closes: #)
тут вместо #nnn должен быть номер ITP
2. если идет аплоад нового пакета в changes должны быть все записи changelog'а
(опция -v debuild/dpkg-b
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 02:32:22PM +, James Westby wrote:
> Just to note that the above doesn't quite match the syntax required
> to auto-close the bug, it needs a colon after the "LP". For those that
> read perl the expression is
In the changelog the syntax was correct and the bug has been cl
sorry, mistake in To address :)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7.dfsg-5
of my package "mina".
It builds these binary packages:
libmina-java - Java network application framework
libmina-java-doc - Java network application framework - documentation
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The u
Le samedi 29 novembre 2008 20:58:49 Vincent Fourmond, vous avez écrit :
> Hello,
Hi,
> I'll take care of it.
Thanks !
> Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7.dfsg-5
> > of my package "mina".
> >
> > It builds these binary packages:
> > libmina-jav
Hello,
I'll take care of it.
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7.dfsg-5
> of my package "mina".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> libmina-java - Java network application framework
> libmina-java-doc - Java network application framework - do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Williams a écrit :
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:37:48 +0100
> Laurent Guignard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have another question about architecture :
>> How is it possible to check if a package could be built on
>> architecture without the ap
[...]
>
> On the upstream README file, Irwin said that :
> "This version runs on Solaris 9 on SPARC, compiled with gcc."
> So for me, dhcp-probe could be built on this platform.
> I haven't any possibility to test the package on this type of
> architecture and i haven't any assigned sponsor too.
>
Hello,
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Moving example source code to -doc package seems a rational suggest to me.
> I've just uploaded a new version including this change to mentors (same
> debian
> revision).
On its way ;-)
Cheers,
Vincent
--
The moon was high now, in a sky as
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 01:37:48PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> I have another question about architecture :
> How is it possible to check if a package could be built on architecture
> without the appropriate hardware ?
> I can say that dhcp-probe could be build on i386 and any compatible
> arc
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:38:53 +0100
Laurent Guignard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It has to build on sparc, you are required to ensure that it does by
> > fixing any FTBFS bugs that appear and those will provide a lot of
> > the information you need to fix the bug. In that case, your sponsor
> >
Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (28/11/2008):
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Taken care of after some modifications.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 01:26:16AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (28/11/2008):
> > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Taken care of after some modifications.
>
Thanks very much for uploading my package.
--
http://syx.googlecode.com - S
Thanks for your review; I will address all of your points in turn later. At
present, though, there is one in particular I'd like to clarify:
> Personally I would expect /usr/include/waitzar-1.0/waitzar
> to be /usr/include/waitzar, since it is that way for most packages.
> Same for the pkgconfi
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.2-3
of my package "basic256".
It builds these binary packages:
basic256 - educational BASIC programming environment for children
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: htt
31 matches
Mail list logo
