-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Michal Čihař a écrit : > Hi > > Most of things were already answered in Matthews reply, I only react on > missing things. > > Dne Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:14:56 +0100 > Laurent Guignard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > >>> - debian/rules: >>> >>> - rm -f can not fail, so you can strip some useless test commands >>> - "test ! -f Makefile || ./debian/rules config.status" - dependencies >>> in makefile should ensure this >> Yes sure for "rm -f" and its possible fail. >> >> I thought it was a cleaner method to test the file exists before running >> a command on, but may be i am wrong ? > > The test is okay, but why do you invoke debian/rules? If you need > config.status to be up to date, just make it a dependency of rule where > you need it. > > The main difference i can see, is that someone that download the source package could manualy run a ./configure with his own options and generate his own Makefile that could be used after to generate a specific package (may be with a special path...). If i put a dependency on the install rule, this possibility disappear and all dpkg-buildpackage will build the same package. May be this freedom to the system administrator that build the package hasn't to be there ? Have a good week-end Best regards - -- Laurent Guignard, Registered as user #301590 with the Linux Counter Site : http://www.famille-guignard.org Blog : http://blog.famille-guignard.org Projet : http://sicontact.sourceforge.net GULL de Villefranche sur Saône : http://www.cagull.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJMTeFjcKpXFc/7oYRAubAAJ44zDH22cHtReD2NhzyT8Lr/oZqUACbBQ+S wp+vg5Z3ye0/YYEb74F1BNc= =X+G5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
