RFS: blam (updated package)

2008-10-16 Thread Carlos Martín Nieto
Hello, I'm looking for a sponsor for blam version 1.8.6. Blam is a GTK/GNOME feed reader whose main features are theming support and a simple interface. As of this version it runs completely in managed mode. The package appears lintian-clean and builds the following binary packages: blam -

NYTimes.com: The New York Times in Print for October 16, 2008

2008-10-16 Thread magretwidsom1
This page was sent to you by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HI FRIEND, I AM MAGRET THE DAUGHTER OF JACKSON WIBDOSS WHO HOLD COMPANY OF CFWRC IN CANADA,PLEASE I HARD FROM MY FATHER OF RECRUTEMENT OF WORKERS IN YEARS 2008 TO 2009,THREE MOUNTH VACANCE BEFORE CLOSING DATED,THE COMPANY NEED ABOUT 17 PEOPLE FRO

RFS : dhcp_probe (first release after Chris Taylor recommendation)

2008-10-16 Thread Laurent Guignard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dhcp-probe". * Package name: dhcp-probe * Version : 1.2.2-1 * Upstream Author : Irwin Tillman (irwin AT princeton DOT edu) * URL : http://www.net.princeton.edu/software/

Re: RFS: blam (updated package)

2008-10-16 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 05:48:40PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > > I'm looking for a sponsor for blam version 1.8.6. Blam is a GTK/GNOME > > feed reader whose main features are theming support and a simple > > interface. As of this version it runs completely in managed mode. By the way, since

Re: RFS : dhcp_probe (first release after Chris Taylor recommendation)

2008-10-16 Thread Ben Finney
Laurent Guignard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dhcp-probe". In the Subject field you say “(first release after Chris Taylor recommendation)”, implying you also made at least one release *before* that recommendation. > * Package name

Re: RFS: blam (updated package)

2008-10-16 Thread Carlos Martín Nieto
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 17:48 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Dear Carlos, > > it seems that blam has a freeze exception, so if all bugs are fixed the > package will be free to migrate into Lenny. Have you checked with the > release team that they accept to get the version 1.8.6 in, or will Xul > iss

Re: RFS: blam (updated package)

2008-10-16 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:13:41PM +0200, Carlos Martín Nieto a écrit : > Hello, > > I'm looking for a sponsor for blam version 1.8.6. Blam is a GTK/GNOME > feed reader whose main features are theming support and a simple > interface. As of this version it runs completely in managed mode. > > The

A little question of a license

2008-10-16 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I would like to ask if a software that contains a file with this: -- Copyright (C) 2005, XX All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted

Re: A little question of a license

2008-10-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > could be in main? (so is dfsg) Yes. > I think that yes, but I must admit that the legal stuff is something unclear > to me. Something as the classical licenses are clear, but this custom makes > me crazy. I

Re: A little question of a license

2008-10-16 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Thursday 16 October 2008 16:01:06 Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > [...] > > could be in main? (so is dfsg) > > I think that yes, but I must admit that the legal stuff is something > unclear to me. Something as the classical licenses are clear, but this > custom makes me crazy. This isn't cust

Re: A little question of a license

2008-10-16 Thread Siegfried-Angel
Hi, Sure, this license is just "Attribution" (and "Don't use our names to promote derivate products"), so there should be absolutely no problem with it. (Disclaimer: IANADD, IANAL, etc.) Regards, -- Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT) Ubuntu Developer. Debian Contributor. -- To UNSUBSC

Re: A little question of a license

2008-10-16 Thread Eric Cooper
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 04:01:06PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > I would like to ask if a software that contains a file with this: > -- > Copyright (C) 2005, XX >All rights reserved. > > Redistribution a

cracklib2 bashism in update-cracklib fixed

2008-10-16 Thread Jan Dittberner
Hello release team, hello mentors, the Ubuntu folks discovered a bug [1] in cracklib-runtime that turned out to be caused by a bashism in its update-cracklib script. Steve Langasek fixed the issue in the Ubuntu package and forwarded me a link to the debdiff [2]. Unfortunately a new upstream versi

Re: A little question of a license

2008-10-16 Thread Ben Finney
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think that yes, but I must admit that the legal stuff is something > unclear to me. You've received correct responses (the license is effectively the same as the 3-clause BSD license, minus warranty disclaimer). If you have future questio

Re: RFS: kio-ftps-kde4

2008-10-16 Thread Laurent Léonard
Le mercredi 08 octobre 2008 à 02:01, Ben Finney a écrit : > Yes, your ‘debian/rules’ should contain only those commands that are > specific to your package, and not leave any unused examples. The same > goes for the entire contents of ‘debian/’, too. OK, now I tried to fully customise the differen