On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 01:20:45AM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> If I add findstring like:
> @if [ -f $(GRADM_PAM) ] ; then \
> echo "Installing gradm_pam..." ; \
> $(INSTALL) -m 4755 $(GRADM_PAM) $(DESTDIR)/sbin ; \
> ifeq (,$(findstring nostrip,$(DEB_B
On Jan 27, 2008 4:37 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.2-1
> of my package "thailatex".
cttex is no longer in Debian because it was orphaned and had "no
users"[1]. Please remove the recommends or re-introduce the package
Dear all,
I got very interested in CDBS, thinking that it would save me a lot of
time if for instance 'nocheck' will be implemented in the Policy some
day. I thought that it was handling nostrip and noopt automagically but
apparently it is not the case for most of the classes.
Does anybody know a
On 27/01/2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I got very interested in CDBS, thinking that it would save me a lot of
> time if for instance 'nocheck' will be implemented in the Policy some
> day. I thought that it was handling nostrip and noopt automagically
> but apparently it is not the case for most of
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 06:15:28PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
> cttex is no longer in Debian because it was orphaned and had "no
> users"[1]. Please remove the recommends or re-introduce the package to
> Debian (starting from the snapshot.d.n package).
>
> 1. http://bugs.debian.org/357875
Thanks fo
Le Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 12:29:38PM +0100, David Bremner a écrit :
>
> Charles> * debian/rules: are you sure that you need to run the
> Charles> configure script? If not, you can drop the
> Charles> build-dependancy on csh.
>
> Hmm. The script is simple, and I could write a replacemen
> "Charles" == Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> Le Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 04:42:39AM +0100, David Bremner a
Charles> écrit :
Charles> I have added your package on the following wiki page:
Charles> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScienceBibliography If you
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Andreas Wenning wrote:
Hi
I have 3 packages which is unusable in lenny+sid as apache has been
removed; I've repackaged those with support for apache2. I'm looking for
a sponsor(s) for all three of them:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=429126
http://bugs
Hello mentors,
this is just a second attempt to find a sponsor for Osmo ;-) If you want
to sponsor, but notice any packaging glitches, just let me know and I
will try to fix them.
By the way, it seems that I am even not the only person interested in
having Osmo in Debian, the ITP-bug[1] even got
A quick question I dare not ask -devel:
When a certain version of a certain binary package has been uploaded to
unstable, can a lower version be uploaded after the offending version has
been removed by the FTP masters, or is it absolutely necessary to add an
epoch?
Normally, when uploading the
> I think you should talk to the Debian QA team and see if the maintainer
> can be classified as "missing in action" (MIA).
Do they have a mailing list or IRC-channel that I could use?
/Andreas
--
Andreas Wenning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
> > I think you should talk to the Debian QA team and see if the maintainer
> > can be classified as "missing in action" (MIA).
>
> Do they have a mailing list or IRC-channel that I could use?
ML: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC: #debian-qa on OFTC network
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
On 27/01/2008, Andreas Wenning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think you should talk to the Debian QA team and see if the maintainer
> > can be classified as "missing in action" (MIA).
>
> Do they have a mailing list or IRC-channel that I could use?
I just asked:
[12:01] coven was set ok for 1y
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 17:27 +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> A quick question I dare not ask -devel:
Don't be scared of -devel (it's usually -private or -policy where the
real flamefests happen). :-)
> When a certain version of a certain binary package has been uploaded to
> unstable, can a lower
> "Charles" == Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> I ran it on powerpc, diffed the new and old makefiles,
Charles> and came to the conclusion that running it did not have
Charles> any significant changes: only one variable was changed,
Charles> containing t
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 07:55:30PM +0100, David Bremner wrote:
> By the way, if you don't mind one more question, can you say how you
> decided that the package was actually GPL 2+? The file headers are
> not explicit, stating only "the GPL".
The headers say just "the GPL" yet GPL included in th
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 12:21 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> IMO (but IANADD) you could adopt libapache-mod-layout and -random but
> not -fastcgi because the maintainer of the latter has said he was
> going to do it "on days of end of year ~ new year." (you should
> probably contact him and try to
On söndagen den 27 januari 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 17:27 +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > A quick question I dare not ask -devel:
>
> Don't be scared of -devel (it's usually -private or -policy where the
> real flamefests happen). :-)
It's not that I'm afraid of -devel,
18 matches
Mail list logo
