On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 07:35:48PM +, tim hall wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> Its in no way important, not even near to it. Its priority extra, so
>> lowest possible priority.
>
> Sorry, wrong terminology. It's a very useful multimedia application, which
> many people use and would expect to
Hi,
> Sorry, wrong terminology. It's a very useful multimedia application,
> which many people use and would expect to find in Debian. Therefore it
> is worth making the extra effort to keep it well maintained IMO. The
> point being that debian-multimedia should deal with it if group
> maintenance
On 2007-12-23, Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Sorry, wrong terminology. It's a very useful multimedia application,
>> which many people use and would expect to find in Debian. Therefore it
>> is worth making the extra effort to keep it well maintained IMO. The
>> point being t
-=| Peter Pentchev, Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 04:04:22AM +0200 |=-
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-2 of my
> package "timelimit". The new revision adds a conflict with
> the "netpipes" package since both install /usr/bin/timelimit.
>
> The upload would fix these bugs: 457444
>
>
Le Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:01:21PM +0100, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
>
> Current GNOME and the upcoming KDE 4 both uses the shared-mime-info
> database in /usr/share/mime.
>
> IMHO you should only try to support the mailcap/metamail and the fd.o
> shared-mime-info systems.
Hi Daniel,
many thanks
reopen 457477
severity 457477 wishlist
retile 457477 Please support the DEBEMAIL environment variable.
thanks
Le Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:35:07PM +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 03:04:44 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > Indeed, here is an extract with the unsuccessful t
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:13:48 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Tools like reportbug work out of the box on my machine; I suppose that
> it is because they recognise the DEBEMAIL environment variable, in which
> there is a routable email adress to use. Do you think that tagpending
> could use it?
It
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.9-3
of my package "poco".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpoco2 - POCO - The C++ Portable Components
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 05:11:35PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 07:04:25PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:02:06PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > > >
Le Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 06:27:59PM +0100, gregor herrmann a écrit :
> On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:13:48 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > Tools like reportbug work out of the box on my machine; I suppose that
> > it is because they recognise the DEBEMAIL environment variable, in which
> > there is a r
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 06:02:35 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Also, it is a bit frustrating that unless digging in the logs, it is not
> possible to know that the operation failed. If the problem is more the
> configuration of the BTS, could at least DEBEMAIL be used to deliver an
> error messag
Le Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 09:10:41PM +, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> >
> The problem is not bts, or tagpending, or the BTS. The problem is that
> your MTA is not configured correctly. With exim, which you appear to be
> using, see /etc/email-addresses.
Le Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 10:18:01PM +0100,
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 09:10:41PM +, Julien Cristau a écrit :
The problem is not bts, or tagpending, or the BTS. The problem is that
your MTA is not configured correctly. With exim, which you appear to be
using, see /etc/email-addresses.
Le
Le Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 04:57:12PM -0500, Asheesh Laroia a écrit :
>
> If your ISP has an SMTP server you can use as a relay, which is almost
> always the case, configuring your Exim to go through that should be fairly
> easy. That should eliminate these purplexing issues (by offloading them
>
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 04:57:12PM -0500, Asheesh Laroia a écrit :
If your ISP has an SMTP server you can use as a relay, which is almost
always the case, configuring your Exim to go through that should be fairly
easy. That should eliminate these pur
Am Montag, den 24.12.2007, 01:39 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Le Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:01:21PM +0100, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
> >
> > Current GNOME and the upcoming KDE 4 both uses the shared-mime-info
> > database in /usr/share/mime.
> >
> > IMHO you should only try to support the mailcap
16 matches
Mail list logo
