On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:38:27PM +, Colin Tuckley wrote:
> Yes, in fact so new that I don't think the lintian update has made it into
> testing yet (you do run lintian -i on your package don't you?).
It's always best to use the lintian in sid, since all packages (most
of them) enter , and ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yougrabber".
* Package name: yougrabber
Version : 0.29.2-1
Upstream Author : Carl Chenet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://yougrabber.sourceforge.net
* License
hi
thanks for all the replies
i got it how to package with signatures
but one more information i need is i have to give -k option to
dpkg-buildpackage command
ie $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -k -sgpg
And at the end it asks for passphrase
So is there any way that i can automate this stuff. ie
On Thursday 13 December 2007, iluvlinux wrote:
> but one more information i need is i have to give -k option to
> dpkg-buildpackage command
>
> ie $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -k -sgpg
the '-rfakeroot' is no longer necessary when using dpkg >= 1.14.7, as in
that case dpkg will use fakeroot by
Subject: RFS: unicornscan
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "unicornscan".
* Package name: unicornscan
Version : 0.4.7-1
Upstream Author : Hans-J. Ullrich
* URL : http://www.unicornscan.org
* License : GPLv2
Section : network
iluvlinux wrote:
[snip]
> ie $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -k -sgpg
[snip]
Complementing what Bart said: '-k' and '-sgpg' are also not needed.
The '-k' is mostly only needed for sponsoring uploads. After a quick
read of the thread, it seems you intend on maintaining this package
yourself.
The '-
I think that the -k is used to specify which key to use. You can have
multiple GPG keys.
I don't know the "safe" way to do what you're asking. But if you find
out please let me know. :)
Thanks,
Michael
On 13/12/2007, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 13 Decem
Hi,
IANADD, but anyways some comments:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:03:54PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> 1. I have an upstream source tar-ball that accidentally includes some
> files that are generated (and cleaned when a make distclean is issued)
the question to decide is: What files doe
Le 13 déc. 07 à 14:33, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag a écrit :
Hello World!,
Hi,
I have a bunch of questions:
1. I have an upstream source tar-ball that accidentally includes some
files that are generated (and cleaned when a make distclean is issued)
using the build system, and it is not necessar
Hello World!,
I have a bunch of questions:
1. I have an upstream source tar-ball that accidentally includes some
files that are generated (and cleaned when a make distclean is issued)
using the build system, and it is not necessary that I include those
files in the orig.tar.gz file. These files
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:56:52PM +1100, Michael Lamothe wrote:
> I think that the -k is used to specify which key to use. You can have
> multiple GPG keys.
>
> I don't know the "safe" way to do what you're asking. But if you find
> out please let me know. :)
Well, there's always gpg-agent, of
Hi Matthias,
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 18:23, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ./src/gnome-color-chooser.1 says the licence is GPL, which means GPL3,
> > while debian/copyright says the software is GPL2+... please fix.
>
> Does it really mean GPL3? Do I ha
On 07/12/13 19:03 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag said ...
> 2. Are there packages in our archive that directly include parsers
> (generated by bison etc.) in the orig.tar.gz directly rather than
> "Build-Depends"-ing on the parser-generator?
gccxml includes gcc's parser and doesn't require bison (ev
Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Well, there's always gpg-agent, of course... isn't this pretty much
> what it was *written* for? :)
Yes, but gpg-agent is a short term temporary volatile cache! Which is very
different from putting your passphrase in the ENVIRONMENT or a script.
--
Colin Tuckley |
Hello,
I'm packaging an interpreted language, Yorick, and a bunch of add-ons
for that language.
I'd like to provide a wrapper package that would depend on all the
packages in this family present in main and suggest the one that is
in non-free. I would like users to get a complete system w
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> Hello World!,
>
> I have a bunch of questions:
>
> 1. I have an upstream source tar-ball that accidentally includes some
> files that are generated (and cleaned when a make distclean is issued)
> using the build system, and it is not necessary that I include those
Le jeudi 13 décembre 2007 à 15:06 +0100, Holger Levsen a écrit :
> And yes, if you refer to "the GPL" today, it certainly means GPL3.
>
Somebody said... GNU GPL ?
I'm pretty sure there are other General Public Licenses out there...
My 2 cents,
--
Olivier BERGER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ATTENTION
Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm packaging an interpreted language, Yorick, and a bunch of add-ons
> for that language.
>
> I'd like to provide a wrapper package that would depend on all the
> packages in this family present in main and suggest the one that is
> in non-free. I would like
Le 13 déc. 07 à 17:20, Felipe Sateler a écrit :
Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Hello,
I'm packaging an interpreted language, Yorick, and a bunch of add-ons
for that language.
I'd like to provide a wrapper package that would depend on all the
packages in this family present in main and suggest the o
On Wednesday, 12.12.2007 at 22:38 +, Colin Tuckley wrote:
> Dave Ewart wrote:
>
> > Hmm, standards version to 3.7.3? Oh, that must be quite new... I'll
> > check that out.
>
> Yes, in fact so new that I don't think the lintian update has made it into
> testing yet (you do run lintian -i on
On Thursday 13 December 2007, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Subject: RFS: unicornscan
Hi,
why is Architecture: field set to amd64 ? I failed to see any amd64 specific
bits in the source code, so you should use Architecture: any.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22
On Wednesday, 12.12.2007 at 22:38 +, Colin Tuckley wrote:
> One additional thing I noticed with the package; it still mentions
> Graham Wilson as the sponsor in a couple of places in addition to his
> earlier roles in the development of the package. It's probably easiest
> to remove references
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Ewart wrote:
> Actually, can I leave those references to Graham in for now?
> Technically, those bits of the text are part of the 'upstream' program
> which (although I am also the author) is not something that would
> normally be changed as part
Am Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007 schrieb George Danchev:
> On Thursday 13 December 2007, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> > Subject: RFS: unicornscan
>
> Hi,
>
> why is Architecture: field set to amd64 ? I failed to see any amd64
> specific bits in the source code, so you should use Architecture: any.
>
H
On Thursday 13 December 2007, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
--cut--
> there is no special reason for this field. I set this to amd64, because I
> have only amd64-architecture available. I am sure, it can also be built on
> i386.
Your amd64 with be fine with arch: any.
> You may change this field, or I w
* Thibaut Paumard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071213 14:46]:
> >Now, the best thing to do would be to copy the upstream tar-ball as-is
> >to orig.tar.gz and have a patch that removes these files (this will
> >result in a big diff).
> I tend to move those files to a safe place in the configure rule and
>
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 03:06:27PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> And yes, if you refer to "the GPL" today, it certainly means GPL3.
Not at all. Well, at least not completely. ;-) GNU GPL 3 itself says
about this (section 14):
If the Program does not specify a version number of the GNU
Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 03:06:27PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> Are now all packages buggy that reference
>>> /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL instead of GPL-2 because GPL now
>>> points to GPL-3?
>> Yes.
>
> Only if they are "GPL 2 only". GPL 3 is a valid license for a GPL2
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mustang".
* Package name: mustang
Version : 3.0-1
Upstream Author : Arun S. Konagurthu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.bx.psu.edu/arun
* License : 3-clause BSD like
Section : science
I
On 13/12/2007, Hans-J. Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unicornscan/unicornscan_0.4.7-1.dsc
dpkg-source: warning: unknown information field 'Version' in input
data in package's section of control info file
Please also provide a debian/watch file (s
On 13/12/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Upstream Author : Carl Chenet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
According to the files under src/ you aren't upstream :)
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yougrabber/yougrabber_0.29.2-1.dsc
debian/changelog: fill an ITP and make the
Hi,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freevo".
>
> * Package name: freevo
> Version : 1.7.3-1
> * URL : freevo.sf.net
> * License : GPL
> Section : graphics
I'll sponsor "freevo" :)
Didn't have the time for a closer look today, but there're
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The ambiguity of using the GPL symlink is not useful - particularly with
> respect to libraries. It is all too easy to re-license a formerly GPL-2+
> library under GPL-3+ (using the machine-operable nomenclature for
> debian/copyright) and thereby make i
Dave Ewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I do run lintian (and linda), but the spare machine I used to build
> the packages was running Lenny at the time I built them. It's now Sid
> ;-)
You can also pin lintian in particular to unstable on a system that's
otherwise testing. It's arch: all
On 07/12/13 23:18 +0100, Bernhard R. Link said ...
> * Thibaut Paumard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071213 14:46]:
> > >Now, the best thing to do would be to copy the upstream tar-ball as-is
> > >to orig.tar.gz and have a patch that removes these files (this will
> > >result in a big diff).
>
> > I tend t
Dear Morten,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:29:49AM +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mustang/mustang_3.0-1.dsc
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
I am not a DD, but want to just make some minor points:
* A diffstat of
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:18:30AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > - dget
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mustang/mustang_3.0-1.dsc
> >
> > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> I am not a DD, but want to just make some minor points:
>
> * A diffstat of yo
37 matches
Mail list logo
