-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dave Ewart wrote:
> Actually, can I leave those references to Graham in for now? > Technically, those bits of the text are part of the 'upstream' program > which (although I am also the author) is not something that would > normally be changed as part of the Debian packaging process. My thought was that they might cause confusion if someone wanted to contact the Debian Developer who uploaded the package. Obviously I was only referring to the "packaging" references and not to the other work he did on the program. There isn't anything that says that the "packaging" process mustn't touch the 'upstream' program, it often has to, the Makefile for instance. All the changes get documented in the <package>.diff.gz for anyone who wants to view them. regards, Colin - -- Colin Tuckley | +44(0)1903 236872 | PGP/GnuPG Key Id Debian Developer | +44(0)7799 143369 | 0x1B3045CE "Energize!" said Picard and the pink bunny appeared... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHYZG9j2OPlhswRc4RAlLYAKCNiRobql86DvIrDGTqYS/hLeJWxgCg8f/Q UkXfnGTGWz11+FxwWNbYkYA= =PSlj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
