Re: RFS: libsbc (updated package) [4th try to find a sponsor]

2007-09-25 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
Dears mentors, 2007/8/9, Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2007/7/28, Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0cvs20070728-1 > > of my package "libsbc". > > > > It builds these binary packages: > > libsbc-dev - Development files for su

Re: RFS: daloRADIUS - Advanced RADIUS Web Management Application

2007-09-25 Thread liran tal
Hey Christoph, First off, thanks for the reply. On 9/24/07, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:56:57AM +0200, liran tal wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "daloradius". > > > > * Package name: daloradius > > Version : 0.9.3 > >

Re: RFS: daloRADIUS - Advanced RADIUS Web Management Application

2007-09-25 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:22:33AM +0200, liran tal wrote: > I will add the webpage address to the debian/copyright. > Is there a webpage tag to add in the debian/control file or should I simply > add it to the description? No. I think what Christoph wants you to do is add "Homepage: http://...";

Re: RFS: daloRADIUS - Advanced RADIUS Web Management Application

2007-09-25 Thread Christoph Haas
Hi, Liran... On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:22:33AM +0200, liran tal wrote: > On 9/24/07, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:56:57AM +0200, liran tal wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "daloradius". > > > > * Package name: da

Re: RFS: daloRADIUS - Advanced RADIUS Web Management Application

2007-09-25 Thread liran tal
On 9/25/07, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, Liran... > > At the end of the description with two spaces as indentation. It's also > a good idea to use it as a control field. Concrete proposal: > > Your "Description" should start with a one-line short description that > is shown in

Re: RFS: pingus (updated package)

2007-09-25 Thread Bas Wijnen
Uhm, ok, someone else uploaded this package in the meantime. The points I raised in the previous e-mail are still worth fixing in the next upload. And I'd still like answers to: > - There is a lintian override installed, which isn't documented in the > changelog. Why is it needed? (In other

Re: RFS: daloRADIUS - Advanced RADIUS Web Management Application

2007-09-25 Thread liran tal
Hey Kumar, On 9/25/07, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:22:33AM +0200, liran tal wrote: > > I will add the webpage address to the debian/copyright. > > Is there a webpage tag to add in the debian/control file or should I > simply > > add it to the description

Re: Building a package for a web application

2007-09-25 Thread Chris Lamb
liran tal wrote: > I've uploaded everything to: > http://daloradius.sourceforge.net/packages/debpkg/ From a quick glance: * daloradius_0.9.3.tar.gz includes the immediate subdirs debian/ and usr/ - you should really avoid trying to create a 'native' package. * Wrong 'Architecture:' in debia

RFS: tesseract (updated package), third time lucky, I hope

2007-09-25 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.01-1 of "tesseract", plus the eight language packages, "tesseract-eng", "tesseract-deu", "tesseract-deu-f", "tesseract-nld", "tesseract-spa", "tesseract-por", "tesseract-ita", "tesseract-fra" It builds these binary packages: tesseract

Re: RFS: dtc (updated package)

2007-09-25 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, Thomas Goirand wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.26.4-1 of my package "dtc". It's been now a long time that I'm searching for a sponsor, as my old sponsor decided to stop sponsoring completely. Oh yay, I can foresee a lot of fun. "dtc" is also used for the "device t

Re: Removing transition stuff in debhelper scripts after which time?

2007-09-25 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, Justin Pryzby wrote: You can drop such things in uploads to unstable after they're included in a stable release. Upgrades across releases are not tested and are officially "not supported" though AFAIK the reasons are largely undocumented. I think it's roughly the same situation as for dow

Re: RFS: daloRADIUS - Advanced RADIUS Web Management Application

2007-09-25 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:47:19AM +0200, liran tal wrote: > I have some questions regarding the package building though which > concerns the orig.tar.gz I think... The way I build the package is > having in the daloradius-0.9.3/ directory the debian/ and the usr/ > directories where the usr/ occu

Re: RFS: daloRADIUS - Advanced RADIUS Web Management Application

2007-09-25 Thread liran tal
Thanks Kumar, will do. On 9/25/07, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:47:19AM +0200, liran tal wrote: > > I have some questions regarding the package building though which > > concerns the orig.tar.gz I think... The way I build the package is > > having in the

Re: RFS: dtc (updated package)

2007-09-25 Thread Thomas Goirand
Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.26.4-1 >> of my package "dtc". It's been now a long time that I'm searching for a >> sponsor, as my old sponsor decided to stop sponsoring completely. > > Oh yay, I can foresee a lot of fun

Re: autoconfigurable package: how to build two configurations?

2007-09-25 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:50:02PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Hello, > > Are there any examples of a package that builds two binary packages, > each from a distinct run of "configure"? > > My specific case is soqt, which provides a Qt interface to Coin > (OpenInventor). There is a sentimen

Menu transition - status of doc-base?

2007-09-25 Thread Daniel Leidert
Hi, Some weeks ago, the menu transition was announced. The doc-base system uses the sections defined in the menu policy for their own Section: field. But may I already use the new menu sections (Applications instead of Apps, ...) in .doc-base files? I checked the Wiki and the original thread about

Re: Menu transition - status of doc-base?

2007-09-25 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 04:33:28PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Some weeks ago, the menu transition was announced. The doc-base system > uses the sections defined in the menu policy for their own Section: > field. But may I already use the new menu sections (Applications instead > of Apps, ...) i

Re: RFS: php-net-pop3

2007-09-25 Thread Mark A. Hershberger
I've updated the package, including patches to attempt to fix some upstream bugs. URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/php-net-pop3/ Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/php-net-pop3/php-net-pop3_

Re: RFS: vidalia

2007-09-25 Thread Zhengpeng Hou
On 星期二 25 九月 2007, Vern Sun wrote: > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vidalia > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/v

Re: RFS: vidalia

2007-09-25 Thread Vern Sun
> I'm not a DD and can't sponsor uploads. However I looked at your > package and have a comment. > Thanks for commenting, I made a little bit changes like, * Build on Sid * Use a watch file * Add "XS-Vcs-Browser", "XS-Vcs-SVN", "Homepage" in control file * Clear the debian/rules, delete

Re: Menu transition - status of doc-base?

2007-09-25 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Dienstag, den 25.09.2007, 20:20 +0530 schrieb Kumar Appaiah: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 04:33:28PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > Some weeks ago, the menu transition was announced. The doc-base system > > uses the sections defined in the menu policy for their own Section: > > field. But may I

Re: Menu transition - status of doc-base?

2007-09-25 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:13:37PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Does it really complain about "Apps" in a doc-base file? The menu > transition itself is already handled in lintian, but I cannot find a > check for the section in doc-base files. I also cannot find any file > in /usr/share/doc-base,

Re: RFS: tesseract (updated package), third time lucky, I hope

2007-09-25 Thread Christoph Haas
Jeffrey, On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:29:35AM +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.01-1 > of "tesseract", plus the eight language packages, "tesseract-eng", > "tesseract-deu", "tesseract-deu-f", "tesseract-nld", "tesseract-spa", > "tesseract-por", "tesse

Re: RFS: tesseract (updated package), third time lucky, I hope

2007-09-25 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
On 25/09/2007, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I may have missed something so bear with me. Currently there are two > packages in "unstable": > > tesseract-ocr - Command line OCR tool > tesseract-ocr-data - Command line OCR tool data > > >From #434152 I

Re: RFS: tesseract (updated package), third time lucky, I hope

2007-09-25 Thread Christoph Haas
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 08:37:31PM +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > On 25/09/2007, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I may have missed something so bear with me. Currently there are two > > packages in "unstable": > > > > tesseract-ocr - Command line OCR tool > > te

Re: RFS: tesseract (updated package), third time lucky, I hope

2007-09-25 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
On 25/09/2007, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why are the include files packages in /usr/include/tesseract? Sounds > like that should rather go into a tesseract-ocr-dev package. Or is it > really needed to run tesseract? I must admit that I am fairly inexperienced at packaging, and I

Re: RFS: tesseract (updated package), third time lucky, I hope

2007-09-25 Thread Christoph Haas
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:13:32PM +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > On 25/09/2007, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why are the include files packages in /usr/include/tesseract? Sounds > > like that should rather go into a tesseract-ocr-dev package. Or is it > > really needed to run t

Re: RFS: xawtv (updated package)

2007-09-25 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
2007/9/23, Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm really glad someone picked this up, so I'm indeed quite interested > in long-term sponsoring of this package as long as it's needed. Thanks > already for all your work! Great! I'm having big troubles in getting my packages uploaded. Some of them

Re: RFS: vidalia

2007-09-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
On 25/09/2007, Zhengpeng Hou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 星期二 25 九月 2007, Vern Sun wrote: > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vidalia > > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > > contri