KChmViewer debian package

2005-11-01 Thread Michal Vanco
Hi all, I've created my very first debian package of kchmviewer-1.1. I'm total newbie in debian packaging system, but I was missing this program so I've created package myself. Is anyone interested in this? Is anyone willing to help me to bring this package to "uploadable" state? regards, mic

Re: KChmViewer debian package

2005-11-01 Thread Jorge Salamero Sanz
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 12:11, Michal Vanco wrote: > I've created my very first debian package of kchmviewer-1.1. I'm total > newbie in debian packaging system, but I was missing this program so I've > created package myself. Is anyone interested in this? Is anyone willing to > help me to bring

Re: KChmViewer debian package

2005-11-01 Thread Michal Vanco
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 13:00, Jorge Salamero Sanz wrote: > On Tuesday 01 November 2005 12:11, Michal Vanco wrote: > > I've created my very first debian package of kchmviewer-1.1. I'm total > > newbie in debian packaging system, but I was missing this program so I've > > created package myself.

Re: KChmViewer debian package

2005-11-01 Thread Tommaso Moroni
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:11:30PM +0100, Michal Vanco wrote: > Hi all, > > I've created my very first debian package of kchmviewer-1.1. I'm total newbie > in debian packaging system, but I was missing this program so I've created > package myself. Is anyone interested in this? Is anyone willing

Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: KChmViewer debian package

2005-11-01 Thread Andreas Fester
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>I've created my very first debian package of kchmviewer-1.1. I'm total >>newbie in debian packaging system, but I was missing this program so I've >>created package myself. Is anyone interested in this? Is anyone willing to >>help me to bring this pa

Re: KChmViewer debian package

2005-11-01 Thread Michal Vanco
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 13:01, Tommaso Moroni wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:11:30PM +0100, Michal Vanco wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've created my very first debian package of kchmviewer-1.1. I'm total > > newbie in debian packaging system, but I was missing this program so I've > > creat

Re: KChmViewer debian package

2005-11-01 Thread Andreas Fester
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > great ... take a look here: http://linny.kte.sjf.stuba.sk/~misko/kchmviewer/ pbuilder says: checking whether i486-linux-gnu-g++ supports -O0... yes checking whether i486-linux-gnu-g++ supports -Wl,--no-undefined... yes checking whether i486-linux-gn

Re: KChmViewer debian package

2005-11-01 Thread Michal Vanco
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 13:41, Andreas Fester wrote: > > great ... take a look here: > > http://linny.kte.sjf.stuba.sk/~misko/kchmviewer/ > > pbuilder says: > > checking whether i486-linux-gnu-g++ supports -O0... yes > checking whether i486-linux-gnu-g++ supports -Wl,--no-undefined... yes > che

Re: KChmViewer debian package

2005-11-01 Thread Jorge Salamero Sanz
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 13:55, Michal Vanco wrote: > I added kdelibs4-dev to debian/control build-depends. some other things: - you must use chmlib from debian, not the one included in the release .tar.gz - you should clean not used *.ex files in debian/ - you should make a menu file - you sh

RFS - kommando - ITP #336607

2005-11-01 Thread Sune Vuorela
Hi! I have built kommando, a kde wheel menu. It gives quicker access to some programs - and it is a nice piece of showoff-eyecandy ;) http://mirror.pusling.com/kommando-rfs/ I have had people using the package for some time now - but I think it is a so cool program that it should enter debian.

Re: KChmViewer debian package

2005-11-01 Thread José Luis Tallón
Jorge Salamero Sanz wrote: >On Tuesday 01 November 2005 12:11, Michal Vanco wrote: > > >>I've created my very first debian package of kchmviewer-1.1. I'm total >>newbie in debian packaging system, but I was missing this program so I've >>created package myself. Is anyone interested in this? Is a

Re: KChmViewer debian package

2005-11-01 Thread José Luis Tallón
Michal Vanco wrote: >On Tuesday 01 November 2005 13:01, Tommaso Moroni wrote: > > >>On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:11:30PM +0100, Michal Vanco wrote: >> >> >>>Hi all, >>> >>>I've created my very first debian package of kchmviewer-1.1. I'm total >>>newbie in debian packaging system, but I was mis

Re: KChmViewer debian package

2005-11-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 15:05 +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote: > PLASE!!! Look for ITPs in WNPP before *duplicating and wasting* effort. Indeed! That is what it is there for! > The problem with KChmViewer is that it used a modified, statically > linked version of chmlib... and that is not admiss

Re: KChmViewer debian package

2005-11-01 Thread Michal Vanco
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 15:08, José Luis Tallón wrote: > Michal Vanco wrote: > >On Tuesday 01 November 2005 13:01, Tommaso Moroni wrote: > >>On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:11:30PM +0100, Michal Vanco wrote: > >>>Hi all, > >>> > >>>I've created my very first debian package of kchmviewer-1.1. I'm tot

double-shlibs

2005-11-01 Thread -.JavaManiac.-
I have the next linda-warning : W: libefltk2.0-dev; Shared object /usr/bin/ecalc is linked with version 6 and 5of libstdc++. The binary object shown above links against 2 versions of the same shared library. This means your package may require conflicting packages to be installed at the same ti

Re: double-shlibs

2005-11-01 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:21:41AM -0400, -.JavaManiac.- wrote: > I have the next linda-warning : > > W: libefltk2.0-dev; Shared object /usr/bin/ecalc is linked with > version 6 and 5of libstdc++. Without knowing the details of your special case I may note that this linda warning is very often bo

Re: double-shlibs

2005-11-01 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:21:41AM -0400, -.JavaManiac.- wrote: >> I have the next linda-warning : >> >> W: libefltk2.0-dev; Shared object /usr/bin/ecalc is linked with >> version 6 and 5of libstdc++. > I can't tell of course if you're suffering from a similar problem

Re: Problem with g++-4.0

2005-11-01 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote: > Hi, Justin, > > I tested with g++ 3.4 but I get error :( > > look. > > /usr/bin/g++-3.4 -fno-exceptions -I/usr/include/SDL -D_REENTRANT -g -O2 > -DPROFILING -DMMX -DDEV_VERSION -o VisualBoyAdvance SDL.o debugger.o > 2xSaI.o Cheats.o EEprom.o Flash.o GBA.o

Re: Problem with g++-4.0

2005-11-01 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:21:27PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote: > > Hi, Justin, > > > > I tested with g++ 3.4 but I get error :( > > > > look. > > > > /usr/bin/g++-3.4 -fno-exceptions -I/usr/include/SDL -D_REENTRANT -g -O2 > > `.gnu.linkonce.t._Z14CPUWriteMe

RFS: irmp3 -- mp3 Jukebox (LIRC support)

2005-11-01 Thread Mario Iseli
License: GPL Description: mp3 Jukebox (LIRC support) With irmp3 you can build a mp3-database and control the playback via remote control (over LIRC). There are a lot of settings to change and your jukebox is like you want it. Location: http://server01.marioiseli.com/~mario/dpkgs/irmp3/ -- To

Re: RFS - kommando - ITP #336607

2005-11-01 Thread Christoph Haas
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 14:42, Sune Vuorela wrote: > I have built kommando, a kde wheel menu. > > It gives quicker access to some programs - and it is a nice piece of > showoff-eyecandy ;) > > http://mirror.pusling.com/kommando-rfs/ > > I have had people using the package for some time now - bu

Re: Problem with g++-4.0

2005-11-01 Thread Joe Smith
"Jose Carlos do Nascimento" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I will open bug against gcc4 and gcc3.4. Please make sure that the libraries listed below were rebuilt with g++3.4 and it was not trying to use versions compiled with g++3.0 ../gb/libgb.a ../prof/libpro

Re: RFS - kommando - ITP #336607

2005-11-01 Thread Ana Guerrero
Hi Sune and all. El Martes, 1 de Noviembre de 2005 13:42, Sune Vuorela escribió: > Hi! > > I have built kommando, a kde wheel menu. > > It gives quicker access to some programs - and it is a nice piece of > showoff-eyecandy ;) > > http://mirror.pusling.com/kommando-rfs/ > > I have had people usin

Re: RFS - kommando - ITP #336607

2005-11-01 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2005-11-01, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - the debian/copyright lacks the years of copyright Fixed > - insane number of Build-Depends - are they all necessary? Maybe not. working on this - it was the 'shortcut' mentioned in new maintainers guide - maybe it was wrong to use it. It

Re: Problem with g++-4.0

2005-11-01 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:21:27PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: >> Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote: >> > Hi, Justin, >> > >> > I tested with g++ 3.4 but I get error :( >> > >> > look. >> > >> > /usr/bin/g++-3.4 -fno-exceptions -I/usr/include/SDL -D_REENTRANT -g -O2 >>

Re: RFS - kommando - ITP #336607

2005-11-01 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2005-11-02, Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it fails. You must change it to: > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), kdelibs4-dev fixed that. > -The program is a systray app, so it would be good to Recommend: kicker Quite reasonable; will add that. > > -Some files are placed in in

RFS: bbrun -- An elegant tool for the Blackbox window manager that runs commands

2005-11-01 Thread Stan Vasilyev
I saw bbrun in WNPP Requested Packages and decided to debianize it. The package is small, clean, pbuilder tested, lintian error free. Can someone take a look at it, maybe spot a few errors and hopefull upload it? License: GPL Description: bbrun is a small but very useful application. It makes it

dpatch & upstream source

2005-11-01 Thread François-Denis Gonthier
hello, I was just wondering. I'm working on some big changes for the new upstream of the erlang packages. The biggest change is that the package is now fully using dpatch, *but*, basing myself on some other package I've seen (coreutils for example), I've put the compressed upstream right in t