On 6.08.05, Dmitri Alenitchev wrote:
Hello Dmitri,
> At http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/requested i was seen request for GNU
> ddrescue. I make this package, but i can't add it, because i'm not Debian
> Developer. Somebody can upload this package?
You should provide provide some URLs to down
Hello everyone,
i'm just packaging a new library and i having problems with the
sonames. Let's call my package libsome. I have (more or less)
libsome1:
/usr/lib/libsome.so.1.1.1
/usr/lib/libsome.so.1 -> /usr/lib/libsome.so.1.1.1
libsome1-dev:
/usr/lib/libsome/libsom
I've installed pbuilder on a sid box but keep getting hung up with
the following error message whenever I try to execute:
pbuilder create
I've tried this on 3 different sid boxes and still get the same
thing each time.
libstdc++.so.6 links to /usr/libstdc++.so.6.0.5, so the file is prese
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 07:57:43AM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
>
>Any thoughts would be appreicated.
The following may be useful.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg00649.html
Regards,
Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
.''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `' http://deb
Hi,
I had the same problem. I followed the instructions at
http://groups.google.de/group/linux.debian.devel/browse_thread/thread/f353a6a4b73b6a81/
where it sais to create a sarge image and update it to sid with
pbuilder create --distribution sarge
pbuilder update --distribution sid --override-
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Ghe Rivero wrote:
[...]
> Apart of this, i also hve python bindings:
> python2.3-libsome:
> /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/libsomemodule.la
> /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/libsome.so
>
> And i have this on lintian:
>
> W: python2.3-
On 8/5/05, Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I package the client -- I did not even note, that upstream also provides a
> server, but as far as I (now) understand, the server is a tool to provide
> the data, so users of tvbrowser can use them. If this is correct, I provide
> only the se
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 10:01:14AM +0200, Ren?? van Bevern wrote:
> Hello Dmitri,
>
> > At http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/requested i was seen request for GNU
> > ddrescue. I make this package, but i can't add it, because i'm not Debian
> > Developer. Somebody can upload this package?
>
> You
I've just started using pbuilder to build my packages and have run
into the following error when trying to build a package:
checking for sigaction... yes
checking for strftime... yes
checking for X... no
checking for XOpenDisplay in -lX11... no
configure: error: XOpenDisplay not found in -lX11
ma
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 12:06:58PM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> I've just started using pbuilder to build my packages and have run
> into the following error when trying to build a package:
>
> checking for sigaction... yes
> checking for strftime... yes
> checking for X... no
> checking for XOpen
On Aug 6, 2005, at 6:09 PM, Bastian Venthur wrote:
I wonder, because even if I've cleaned up the whole sources, there
would
still be the .orig.tar.gz where all this copyrighted stuff is in.
You just encountered the case where you need to repackage the source
code, with the non-free parts re
Hi,
On sam, aoû 06, 2005, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> Is there a flag or options I need to set in pbuilder for X to be
> recognized?
Your package is borken, this is not a pbuilder issue, but pbuilder
detects it: you are missing build-dependencies. In this case, it seems
you're missing a bui
Andrew Saunders wrote:
[...]
> But having had a quick peek inside the orig.tar.gz, it looks like
> there's stuff in there that renders it completely undistributable,
> even from non-free. Everything under win/include/ contains:
>
> * Copyright 1997-1999 by Sun Microsystems, Inc.,
> * 901 San An
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 02:28:32PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Ghe Rivero wrote:
> [...]
> > Apart of this, i also hve python bindings:
> > python2.3-libsome:
> > /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/libsomemodule.la
> > /usr/lib/python2.3/site-p
On 05/08/06 18:20 +0200, Philipp Kern said ...
> On Aug 6, 2005, at 6:09 PM, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> > I wonder, because even if I've cleaned up the whole sources, there
> > would still be the .orig.tar.gz where all this copyrighted stuff is
> > in.
>
> You just encountered the case where you nee
Andrew Saunders wrote:
[...]
> But having had a quick peek inside the orig.tar.gz, it looks like
> there's stuff in there that renders it completely undistributable,
> even from non-free. Everything under win/include/ contains:
>
> * Copyright 1997-1999 by Sun Microsystems, Inc.,
> * 901 San An
On 8/6/05, Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) The gifs are free!
Unfortunately not. :-( Try actually downloading the graphics from that
site using the link provided, and you're forced to accept the
following license agreement:
---
SUN IS WILLING TO MAKE THE ACCOMPANYING SOFTWARE GRA
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 09:34:37AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 02:28:32PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Ghe Rivero wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Apart of this, i also hve python bindings:
> > > python2.3-libsome:
> > > /usr/lib/py
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 06:21:22PM +0200, Lo?ɺc Minier wrote..
>
> I suggest you try understanding what the requirements are to
> build your package, this is usually achieved by reading the
> upstream INSTALL file or better: the configure.ac/in. You can
> then derive the needed build-de
Hi,
Kevin Coyner wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 06:21:22PM +0200, Lo???c Minier wrote..
> >
> > I suggest you try understanding what the requirements are to
> > build your package, this is usually achieved by reading the
> > upstream INSTALL file or better: the configure.ac/in. You can
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 08:52:24PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 09:34:37AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 02:28:32PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Ghe Rivero wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > Apart o
Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> because even if I've cleaned up the whole sources, there would still be
> the .orig.tar.gz where all this copyrighted stuff is in.
There is a target in debian/rules which can sift the upstream tarball
to produce an .orig.tar.gz if needed. Most oft
Hi Andrew and Mentors,
Andrew Saunders wrote:
> On 8/6/05, Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 2) The gifs are free!
>
> Unfortunately not. :-( Try actually downloading the graphics from that
> site using the link provided, and you're forced to accept the
> following license agreemen
On 8/6/05, Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fine, for me that's a good start. I'd like to package tvbrowser as non-free
> at the first run and in the meantime try to convince upstream to substitute
> this non-free-images with free ones in the next version. If they don't want
> to do so
Hi Andrew and Mentors,
Andrew Saunders wrote:
> On 8/6/05, Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Fine, for me that's a good start. I'd like to package tvbrowser as
>> non-free at the first run and in the meantime try to convince upstream to
>> substitute this non-free-images with free
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 10:59:08PM +0100, Andrew Saunders wrote:
> > In the meantime I've found something about the copyrighted files from sun.
> > Actually these files are part of the official j2sdk! The contens of
> > win/include seems to be just a copy of my /usr/lib/j2sdk1.5-sun/include.
> > Bu
26 matches
Mail list logo
