dh_make's debian/rules is not authoritative, but it does separate
configure, build, and install phases.
i am trying to package a software that has a single script to do it
all, and it's very difficult to pull the three apart because of
dependencies between parts. it does not use autotools.
my que
Hi,
> my question is whether you can see any problems arising from this?
> or does it not matter if i have NOOP configure and build targets and
> do everything in the install target before debianising in binary-*?
Only the targets mentioned in the policy are required, i.e. there is no
need to eve
On Tue, 24, Aug, 2004 at 01:51:40PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar spoke thus..
> Include the upstream homepage in the description in debian/control.
Although policy states this is optional, I agree with you so I've done
it.
> Also, remove the commented out lines in debian/rules.
Done - I agree,
- Original Message -
From: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: readline library question
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 03:34:57PM -0400, Alexander Baranov wrote:
> >
> > So, the readline seems to work fine with standard inp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi people
Well, about Raster3D. I have talked a little more with the author:
*ABOUT THE LICENSE*
OK, this is one time too many. It seems I must bow to the inevitable
and add a paragraph marked "License" to the web site and to the
distributed packa
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 03:52:34PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> So... even with the author giving us permission to put Raster3D on
> Debian, it's necessary to have a license?
Explicit permission to distribute should be enough for non-free. Include
all the documentation you have (e.g. the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I have a explicity permission to distribute Raster3D from the author. It
can also be used for commercial purposes.
The package is linda and linthian clean and is availabe at
http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/raster3d/
Could someone take
Hello,
I recently soldered a couple of SNES controllers as suggested in the
Documentation/input/joystick-parport.txt file (from the kernel tree).
The controllers work well under the stock Debian 2.4.18-1-686 kernel,
but I've been unable to get the controllers working under several 2.6
kernels (th
Hi
dmalloc is a valid candidate regarding pts, but is blocking itself
regarding bjorn.haxx.se and it isn't even built on arm regarding
buildd.net???
So, what is wrong and when will dmalloc 5.3.0-3 be ready to enter testing?
Cheers
Luk
> Hi people
>
> Well, about Raster3D. I have talked a little more with the author:
>
> *ABOUT THE LICENSE*
>
> OK, this is one time too many. It seems I must bow to the inevitable
> and add a paragraph marked "License" to the web site and to the
> distributed package. But it may take me some w
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 01:04:54AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> dmalloc is a valid candidate regarding pts, but is blocking itself
> regarding bjorn.haxx.se and it isn't even built on arm regarding
> buildd.net???
> So, what is wrong and when will dmalloc 5.3.0-3 be ready to enter testing?
Package:
Frank K?ster wrote:
> By the way, why are only alphanumerics, . and + allowed in version
> numbers? If this were less resctrictive, one could do
>
> dpkg --compare-versions 1-3_sarge.1 gt 1-3.1; echo $?
In part so that filenames can be parsed easily. If package names and
version numbers could co
Hi,
I would like to remove two ITP:, namely python2.3-lame and lsongs. I
want to remove python2.3-lame because it depends on LAME, which has
patent issues. LSongs needs to be removed too because the current
version depends on python2.3-lame.
It is pointless to leave them open, since neither
* Lawrence Williams [Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:26:25 -0230]:
> Hi,
> I would like to remove two ITP:, namely python2.3-lame and lsongs. I
> want to remove python2.3-lame because it depends on LAME, which has
> patent issues. LSongs needs to be removed too because the current
> version depends on pyth
Matt Fishburn wrote:
Hello,
I recently soldered a couple of SNES controllers as suggested in the
Documentation/input/joystick-parport.txt file (from the kernel tree).
The controllers work well under the stock Debian 2.4.18-1-686 kernel,
but I've been unable to get the controllers working unde
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:28:38 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 01:04:54AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> dmalloc is a valid candidate regarding pts, but is blocking itself
>> regarding bjorn.haxx.se and it isn't even built on arm regarding
>> buildd.net???
>
>> So, what is wro
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 03:58:30AM -0500, Zak B. Elep wrote:
>I've just finished a very *late* deb of gtklp-0.9u. Nothing really
>worth noting, except that it might get into Sarge (but, in all
>probability, it won't :()
Please post the URL of the source debian package.
Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
* Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-26 23:26:25 -0230]:
> It is pointless to leave them open, since neither package can ever be
> released.
Am I missing something here...couldn't these packages be in contrib if
they themselves are free, even if their dependencies aren't?
--
John
John Buttery wrote:
* Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-26 23:26:25 -0230]:
It is pointless to leave them open, since neither package can ever be
released.
Am I missing something here...couldn't these packages be in contrib if
they themselves are free, even if their depe
dh_make's debian/rules is not authoritative, but it does separate
configure, build, and install phases.
i am trying to package a software that has a single script to do it
all, and it's very difficult to pull the three apart because of
dependencies between parts. it does not use autotools.
my que
Hi,
> my question is whether you can see any problems arising from this?
> or does it not matter if i have NOOP configure and build targets and
> do everything in the install target before debianising in binary-*?
Only the targets mentioned in the policy are required, i.e. there is no
need to eve
On Tue, 24, Aug, 2004 at 01:51:40PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar spoke thus..
> Include the upstream homepage in the description in debian/control.
Although policy states this is optional, I agree with you so I've done
it.
> Also, remove the commented out lines in debian/rules.
Done - I agree,
- Original Message -
From: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: readline library question
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 03:34:57PM -0400, Alexander Baranov wrote:
> >
> > So, the readline seems to work fin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi people
Well, about Raster3D. I have talked a little more with the author:
*ABOUT THE LICENSE*
OK, this is one time too many. It seems I must bow to the inevitable
and add a paragraph marked "License" to the web site and to the
distributed package.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 03:52:34PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> So... even with the author giving us permission to put Raster3D on
> Debian, it's necessary to have a license?
Explicit permission to distribute should be enough for non-free. Include
all the documentation you have (e.g. the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I have a explicity permission to distribute Raster3D from the author. It
can also be used for commercial purposes.
The package is linda and linthian clean and is availabe at
http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/raster3d/
Could someone take a loo
Hello,
I recently soldered a couple of SNES controllers as suggested in the
Documentation/input/joystick-parport.txt file (from the kernel tree).
The controllers work well under the stock Debian 2.4.18-1-686 kernel,
but I've been unable to get the controllers working under several 2.6
kernels (th
Frank Küster wrote:
> By the way, why are only alphanumerics, . and + allowed in version
> numbers? If this were less resctrictive, one could do
>
> dpkg --compare-versions 1-3_sarge.1 gt 1-3.1; echo $?
In part so that filenames can be parsed easily. If package names and
version numbers could co
Hi
dmalloc is a valid candidate regarding pts, but is blocking itself
regarding bjorn.haxx.se and it isn't even built on arm regarding
buildd.net???
So, what is wrong and when will dmalloc 5.3.0-3 be ready to enter testing?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
> Hi people
>
> Well, about Raster3D. I have talked a little more with the author:
>
> *ABOUT THE LICENSE*
>
> OK, this is one time too many. It seems I must bow to the inevitable
> and add a paragraph marked "License" to the web site and to the
> distributed package. But it may take me some w
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 01:04:54AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> dmalloc is a valid candidate regarding pts, but is blocking itself
> regarding bjorn.haxx.se and it isn't even built on arm regarding
> buildd.net???
> So, what is wrong and when will dmalloc 5.3.0-3 be ready to enter testing?
Package:
Hi,
I would like to remove two ITP:, namely python2.3-lame and lsongs. I
want to remove python2.3-lame because it depends on LAME, which has
patent issues. LSongs needs to be removed too because the current
version depends on python2.3-lame.
It is pointless to leave them open, since neither pac
* Lawrence Williams [Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:26:25 -0230]:
> Hi,
> I would like to remove two ITP:, namely python2.3-lame and lsongs. I
> want to remove python2.3-lame because it depends on LAME, which has
> patent issues. LSongs needs to be removed too because the current
> version depends on pyth
Matt Fishburn wrote:
Hello,
I recently soldered a couple of SNES controllers as suggested in the
Documentation/input/joystick-parport.txt file (from the kernel tree).
The controllers work well under the stock Debian 2.4.18-1-686 kernel,
but I've been unable to get the controllers working under sev
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:28:38 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 01:04:54AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> dmalloc is a valid candidate regarding pts, but is blocking itself
>> regarding bjorn.haxx.se and it isn't even built on arm regarding
>> buildd.net???
>
>> So, what is wro
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 03:58:30AM -0500, Zak B. Elep wrote:
>I've just finished a very *late* deb of gtklp-0.9u. Nothing really
>worth noting, except that it might get into Sarge (but, in all
>probability, it won't :()
Please post the URL of the source debian package.
Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
* Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-26 23:26:25 -0230]:
> It is pointless to leave them open, since neither package can ever be
> released.
Am I missing something here...couldn't these packages be in contrib if
they themselves are free, even if their dependencies aren't?
--
John
John Buttery wrote:
* Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-26 23:26:25 -0230]:
It is pointless to leave them open, since neither package can ever be
released.
Am I missing something here...couldn't these packages be in contrib if
they themselves are free, even if their dependenci
Dear People,
I've tried my hand at building Subversion 1.1.0-rc2 packages. I've
imitated the packaging of the official Debian packages as far as possible.
Whenever possible I applied the Debian patches. However, since I don't
understand exactly what I am doing, I suppose some breakage was
inevi
Mathew is right. I have to be nicer with new people. And i should not write
mails at 2AM when i am almost falling asleep and not taking more care of my
language.
However my points stand. DFSG are the guides by which a DD and non-DD wanting
to put packages in the repository should be enlightened. T
40 matches
Mail list logo
