On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:28:38 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 01:04:54AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> dmalloc is a valid candidate regarding pts, but is blocking itself
>> regarding bjorn.haxx.se and it isn't even built on arm regarding
>> buildd.net???
>
>> So, what is wrong and when will dmalloc 5.3.0-3 be ready to enter testing?
>
> Package: dmalloc
> Version: 5.3.0-3
> Depends: libdmalloc4-dev
>
> Package: libdmalloc4-dev
> Version: 5.3.0-3
> Depends: libdmalloc4 (= 5.3.0-3)
>
> Package: libdmalloc4
> Version: 5.3.0-3
> Conflicts: dmalloc
^^^^^^^^^
This needs to be a versioned conflicts.
>
> This is *not* how you create a transition package. You've left dmalloc
> uninstallable -- don't upload uninstallable packages to the archive!
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
My key was last signed 08/18/2004. If you use GPG *please* see me about
signing the key. ***** My computer can't give you viruses by email. ***
