Re: RFS: rlplot - generate publication quality graphs

2004-07-07 Thread James Stone
> > There are two separate things that you deal with in R. > > The first is raw data. A simple spreadsheet program like gnumeric or a > texteditor sufices to enter the data. > > Once you've got the raw data, you (ideally) perform all of the > manipulations of that data in R to prepare your graph

Re: RFS: rlplot - generate publication quality graphs

2004-07-07 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004, James Stone wrote: > I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for > sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn > with a steep learning curve.. No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people do. [But when you need

Re: RFS: rlplot - generate publication quality graphs

2004-07-07 Thread elijah wright
> > I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for > > sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn with > > a steep learning curve.. > > No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people do. > [But when you need its features, it's often the

R and svg [Re: RFS: rlplot - generate publication quality graphs]

2004-07-07 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004, elijah wright wrote: > methinks there's probably an svg output package for R on CRAN Like http://www.darkridge.com/~jake/RSvg/ ? ;-) Don Armstrong -- The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing

Re: RFS: rlplot - generate publication quality graphs

2004-07-07 Thread James Stone
> > There are two separate things that you deal with in R. > > The first is raw data. A simple spreadsheet program like gnumeric or a > texteditor sufices to enter the data. > > Once you've got the raw data, you (ideally) perform all of the > manipulations of that data in R to prepare your graph

Re: RFS: rlplot - generate publication quality graphs

2004-07-07 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004, James Stone wrote: > I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for > sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn > with a steep learning curve.. No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people do. [But when you need

Re: RFS: rlplot - generate publication quality graphs

2004-07-07 Thread elijah wright
> > I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for > > sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn with > > a steep learning curve.. > > No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people do. > [But when you need its features, it's often the

R and svg [Re: RFS: rlplot - generate publication quality graphs]

2004-07-07 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004, elijah wright wrote: > methinks there's probably an svg output package for R on CRAN Like http://www.darkridge.com/~jake/RSvg/ ? ;-) Don Armstrong -- The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing

Symantec AntiVirus ha trovato un Virus in un documento da te creato.

2004-07-07 Thread Symantec_Anti_Virus%COMUNERE
Contatta l'amministartore di sistema. The infected component in the scanned document was deleted. Violation Information: The attachment document_with_notice.zip contained the virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was deleted. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubsc