> > I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for > > sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn with > > a steep learning curve.. > > No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people do. > [But when you need its features, it's often the only thing that will > work.]
R is like emacs, only moreso. and that's why some of us love it. > Presumably it does postscript or svg output... (R does the former, and > you can trivially convert to the later.) methinks there's probably an svg output package for R on CRAN.... elijah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
