On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 08:48:39PM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 03:25:06PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 11:57:38AM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> >
> > > Notice libfam0c102 isn't coming in with a version dependency. Is there
> > > to make
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:47:26PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> dh_shlibdeps (via dpkg-shlibdeps) uses information that the library
> maintainer provided (the shlibs file) to determine the appropriate
> dependency. This mechanism is documented in the policy manual.
Good answer. Got it. (What
> I strongly recommend that you follow the "0.99+1.0beta4-1" scheme that
> was suggested. Yes it's long, but it's also correct, flexible, and
> proven. In summary, the format is
> [last_stable_version]+[experimental_version]-[package_version]. Please
> use it, starting with your existing pac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Would someone, please be so kind to upload my libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
package.
It's an upload for a new upstream version.
Package: libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
Version: 1.1.3-1
Priority: optional
Section: perl
Maintainer: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Would someone, please be so kind to upload my libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
| package.
You can find the package on mentors.debian.net.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA5pp65UTeB5t8Mo0RAkQ/AJ4ux4HNfm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Would someone be so kind to upload my dmalloc package.
It is a new upstream version, some minor bugfixes as well as a package
split. All comments are welcome.
You can find the package on mentors.debian.net
Attached is the control file.
Many th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Would someone, please be so kind to upload the adopted xpat2 package.
I have also changed the dependencies to the splitted xlibs
You can find the package on mentors.debian.net
Package: xpat2
Version: 1.07-8
Priority: optional
Section: games
Mai
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:32:37PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
> But I have a doubt suddently, since the (close: #ITP_nb) is not in the
> changelog of the _last_ revision ... Do I need it to be in the last
> revision to be taken into account ?
dpkg-buildpackage -v is your friend.
--
Colin Wats
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
I strongly recommend that you follow the "0.99+1.0beta4-1" scheme that
was suggested. Yes it's long, but it's also correct, flexible, and
proven. In summary, the format is
[last_stable_version]+[experimental_version]-[package_version]. Please
use it, starting with you
>
> There were two points I was trying to make. One is that the format
> "1.4+1.5beta3-1" is superior to your proposed "short" version
> "1.4-1+beta3", which looks like trouble.
well good point again, I should have been not very carefully, in fact, I
was proposing something like 1.4+beta3-1 (m
Hello.
How to make transitional packages with cdbs? I tried to simply add an
extra package in control, that depends on new package. But CDBS then
moves some files (the main binary also) in debian/tmp instead of debian/
and doesn't include them in package. :(
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how should I handle the udev
case? I can detect it, no problem; still I am looking forward for
documentation how should I achieve this with udev and/or examples how
other packages do
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:45:01PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>Hi
>
>Would someone, please be so kind to upload the adopted xpat2 package.
I would just like to run pbuilder on the debian source package and
lintian and linda on the .changes file created by pbuilder.
>I have also changed the dependenc
Le dim, 04/07/2004 à 02:40 +0400, Dan Korostelev a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> How to make transitional packages with cdbs? I tried to simply add an
> extra package in control, that depends on new package. But CDBS then
> moves some files (the main binary also) in debian/tmp instead of debian/
> and doe
В сообщении от Вск, 2004-07-04 at 00:53 +0200, Sebastien Bacher писал:
> The files are installed in debian/tmp and then moved according to the
> packages.install files. So you need to create a .install
> with the content of .
> An example of .install (the lines need to start with debian/tmp):
> de
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [Sun, 04 Jul 2004 08:56:54 +1000]:
> >You can find the package on mentors.debian.net
> xpat2_1.07.orig.tar.gz is missing at:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xpat2/
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/x/xpat2, since it's not a new
upstream release.
Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
also provided a transitional packages. I already mailed Debian's gwget
maintainer, but I want you guys to look at it and test it, because I
just started packagi
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:41:53PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>Hi
>
>Would someone be so kind to upload my dmalloc package.
>
>It is a new upstream version, some minor bugfixes as well as a package
>split. All comments are welcome.
>
>You can find the package on mentors.debian.net
I run pbuilder on t
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:34:30PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>Hi
>
>Would someone, please be so kind to upload my libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
>package.
>
>It's an upload for a new upstream version.
I run pbuilder on the debian source package and lintian and linda
on the .changes file created by pbuil
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:48:07AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
>version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
>also provided a transitional packages. I already mailed Debian's gwget
>maintainer, but I wan
> I strongly recommend that you follow the "0.99+1.0beta4-1" scheme that
> was suggested. Yes it's long, but it's also correct, flexible, and
> proven. In summary, the format is
> [last_stable_version]+[experimental_version]-[package_version]. Please
> use it, starting with your existing pac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Would someone, please be so kind to upload my libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
package.
It's an upload for a new upstream version.
Package: libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
Version: 1.1.3-1
Priority: optional
Section: perl
Maintainer: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Would someone, please be so kind to upload my libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
| package.
You can find the package on mentors.debian.net.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA5pp65UTeB5t8Mo0RAkQ/AJ4ux4HNfmU1Nebh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Would someone be so kind to upload my dmalloc package.
It is a new upstream version, some minor bugfixes as well as a package
split. All comments are welcome.
You can find the package on mentors.debian.net
Attached is the control file.
Many thanks in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Would someone, please be so kind to upload the adopted xpat2 package.
I have also changed the dependencies to the splitted xlibs
You can find the package on mentors.debian.net
Package: xpat2
Version: 1.07-8
Priority: optional
Section: games
Maintaine
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:32:37PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
> But I have a doubt suddently, since the (close: #ITP_nb) is not in the
> changelog of the _last_ revision ... Do I need it to be in the last
> revision to be taken into account ?
dpkg-buildpackage -v is your friend.
--
Colin Wats
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
I strongly recommend that you follow the "0.99+1.0beta4-1" scheme that
was suggested. Yes it's long, but it's also correct, flexible, and
proven. In summary, the format is
[last_stable_version]+[experimental_version]-[package_version]. Please
use it, starting with your
>
> There were two points I was trying to make. One is that the format
> "1.4+1.5beta3-1" is superior to your proposed "short" version
> "1.4-1+beta3", which looks like trouble.
well good point again, I should have been not very carefully, in fact, I
was proposing something like 1.4+beta3-1 (m
Hello.
How to make transitional packages with cdbs? I tried to simply add an
extra package in control, that depends on new package. But CDBS then
moves some files (the main binary also) in debian/tmp instead of debian/
and doesn't include them in package. :(
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how should I handle the udev
case? I can detect it, no problem; still I am looking forward for
documentation how should I achieve this with udev and/or examples how
other packages do
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:45:01PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>Hi
>
>Would someone, please be so kind to upload the adopted xpat2 package.
I would just like to run pbuilder on the debian source package and
lintian and linda on the .changes file created by pbuilder.
>I have also changed the dependenc
Le dim, 04/07/2004 à 02:40 +0400, Dan Korostelev a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> How to make transitional packages with cdbs? I tried to simply add an
> extra package in control, that depends on new package. But CDBS then
> moves some files (the main binary also) in debian/tmp instead of debian/
> and doe
Ð ÑÐÐÐÑ ÐÑ ÐÑÐ, 2004-07-04 at 00:53 +0200, Sebastien Bacher
ÐÐÑÐÐ:
> The files are installed in debian/tmp and then moved according to the
> packages.install files. So you need to create a .install
> with the content of .
> An example of .install (the lines need to start with debian/tmp):
> d
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [Sun, 04 Jul 2004 08:56:54 +1000]:
> >You can find the package on mentors.debian.net
> xpat2_1.07.orig.tar.gz is missing at:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xpat2/
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/x/xpat2, since it's not a new
upstream release.
Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
also provided a transitional packages. I already mailed Debian's gwget
maintainer, but I want you guys to look at it and test it, because I
just started packagi
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:41:53PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>Hi
>
>Would someone be so kind to upload my dmalloc package.
>
>It is a new upstream version, some minor bugfixes as well as a package
>split. All comments are welcome.
>
>You can find the package on mentors.debian.net
I run pbuilder on t
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:34:30PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>Hi
>
>Would someone, please be so kind to upload my libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
>package.
>
>It's an upload for a new upstream version.
I run pbuilder on the debian source package and lintian and linda
on the .changes file created by pbuil
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:48:07AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
>version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
>also provided a transitional packages. I already mailed Debian's gwget
>maintainer, but I wan
Ð ÑÐÐÐÑ ÐÑ ÐÑÐ, 2004-07-04 at 12:13 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar
ÐÐÑÐÐ:
> When I run pbuilder on the debian source package of gwget, it couldn't
> fetch from my local debian mirror:
> libgnome2-common_2.6.1-6_all.deb
> libgnome2-0_2.6.1-6_i386.deb
> libgnome2-dev_2.6.1-6_i386.deb
May be you
On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
> ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how should I handle the udev
> case? I can detect it, no problem; still I am looking forward for
> documentation how
40 matches
Mail list logo
