On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:37:40 -0700, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> * Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28
>> 22:21:14 +1000]:
>>
>>> I don't think you should create a debian package for small script,
>>> IMO.
>
Some preliminary comments as I have not yet had time to look at the
package proper:
- the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the
debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream
tarballs contain debian/* as the files do not seem to be on the sf.net
mirrors yet. From the
> > - the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the
> > debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream
> > tarballs contain debian/* as the files do not seem to be on the sf.net
> > mirrors yet.
they do.
> > From the CVS logs you seem to be part of the development
> > te
On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lainé wrote:
> Some preliminary comments as I have not yet had time to look at the
> package proper:
>
> - the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the
> debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream
> tarballs contain debian/* as t
> no problem, I'm the release tech anyway.
> I'm on it.
done.
revision 2 is on its way on kalyxo, and as ever it's on
http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/
and as ever lintian, linda and pdebuild clean.
any remark ?
--
Pierre Habouzit
http://www.madism.org/
signature.asc
Description:
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:50 AM, Peter Rockai (mornfall)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lainé wrote:
[...]
>> - the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes
>> (1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when
>> the final 1.0 vers
Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course.
>
> Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number.
I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number?
Christoph
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:15:07PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
>
> That would be the [1]key signing coordination page.
>
> K.
>
> [1] http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
>
Okies! Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Zakame
--
|=-ZAK B. ELEP (Registered Linux
Name: knoda
Licence: GPL
Short description: knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on
hk_classes
Long description: http://www.knoda.org/
Where can the package be obtained: by emailing me.
more info:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=160321
signature.asc
Description: Ce
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:15:07PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
> That would be the [1]key signing coordination page.
>
> K.
>
> [1] http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
According to the Applicant's Checklist[1]:
> # The applicant's identity needs to be verified.
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Christoph Wegscheider wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course.
> >
> > Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number.
> I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number?
Indeed, in
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:16 AM, Christoph Wegscheider
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course.
>>
>> Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number.
> I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number?
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:32:32AM +0200, Stan Pinte wrote:
>Name: knoda
>Licence: GPL
>Short description: knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on
>hk_classes
>Long description: http://www.knoda.org/
>Where can the package be obtained: by emailing me.
Please post to the list the locat
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 04:55:42AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>I'm also searching a sponsor to upload UrlGfe (http://urlget.sf.net)
>packages from mentors.debian.org to debian unstable. UrlGfe is a
>graphical download manager, that's using GTK+ for its UI and the great
>libcurl for file downloadi
Hallo Lucas,
* Lucas Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-01 12:05]:
[...]
> >i dont no the url exactly, but search the debian.org website, there is a
> >site, where you can search for a dd in your environment.
> >try to search google for debian key signing program.
>
> that would be the [1]key sig
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:20:23AM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
>Hello!
>
>I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ (and I would like to start my NM
>application too). The will be available soon at :
>
> deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
You didn't put the following lines in debian
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 12:57:22AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:37:40 -0700, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> * Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28
>>> 22:21:14 +1000]:
>>>
I don'
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 07:42:34PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
>Package name: cc65
>Version : 2.10.1
>Upstream Author : Ullrich von Bassewitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>URL : http://www.cc65.org/
>License : zlib-alike
>Description : Cross deve
> You didn't put the following lines in debian/copyright (see [0] and
> [1]):
[...]
> grep -ri copyright akregator-1.0_beta4fixed/akregator/src/
very good point.
done
> Please consider to put the URL of the home page of the package in the
> description in debian/control. See [2] and [3].
done too
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:32:32AM +0200, Stan Pinte wrote:
> Name: knoda
> Licence: GPL
> Short description: knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on
> hk_classes
This description sucks. Don't start with the package name, it's too long,
and what is hk_classes (and why should I, as a
* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-01 13:58:04 +0200]:
> That is a solid RFS!
>
> I still didn't made time to check it out
> and will not able the next few days.
>
> Try to find a sponsor at Debian mailinglist that have
> interrest in other architectures and/or embedded application.
>
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-01 00:57:22 -0500]:
> > Maybe kernel-package?
Exactly. That's the best place for it IMHO.
> Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
> ketchup do?
Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm),
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 07:42:34PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
[snip]
> I was digging around trying to find a useful emulation-related utilities
> after my failed attempt at packaging Gens due to legal issues[0], and
> somebody pointed me to this little gem. At first it appeared that it was
>
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
ketchup do?
Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm), compiles and install it as far as I remember correctly.
Actually, it only fetches the required patches,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:32:08PM +, Jack Wasey wrote:
> Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> >
> >>Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
> >> ketchup do?
> >
> > Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
> > -pre, -mm), compiles and install it as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|
| I'll have a look at this package this weekend, and if everything is ok,
| I'll sponsor you. I've got 16 years of experience with 6510-assembly,
| which should be enough... Granted, I haven't done any
| 65816-programming.
|
|
| Regards: David Wei
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 02:46:10PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> |
> | I'll have a look at this package this weekend, and if everything is ok,
> | I'll sponsor you. I've got 16 years of experience with 6510-assembly,
> | which should be enough
Hi Michael (and d-mentors),
> All issues are fixed and updated packages are available:
> deb http://www.teco.edu/~biebl/debian/ unstable main
I am going to sponsor.
I've uploaded to anonymous-ftp-master.
--
ARAKI Yasuhiro
A Debian Official Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I sent this message to the sasl2-bin package maintainer, but I suspect
he's really busy. I haven't received a response.
I'm not sure whether to open a bug, because I don't understand the
problem. I can't reproduce the problem with the sasl2-bin binary
package, compiling the source package on m
Hi,
On Monday 28 June 2004 01:11 pm, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 07:05:54PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> > Regarding the debian/copyright: Should I leave the line 'This package
> > was debianized by ...' untouched? Or should this line be updated to
> > reflect new mainta
Some preliminary comments as I have not yet had time to look at the
package proper:
- the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the
debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream
tarballs contain debian/* as the files do not seem to be on the sf.net
mirrors yet. From the
> > - the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the
> > debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream
> > tarballs contain debian/* as the files do not seem to be on the sf.net
> > mirrors yet.
they do.
> > From the CVS logs you seem to be part of the development
> > te
On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lainé wrote:
> Some preliminary comments as I have not yet had time to look at the
> package proper:
>
> - the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the
> debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream
> tarballs contain debian/* as t
> no problem, I'm the release tech anyway.
> I'm on it.
done.
revision 2 is on its way on kalyxo, and as ever it's on
http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/
and as ever lintian, linda and pdebuild clean.
any remark ?
--
Pierre Habouzit
http://www.madism.org/
signature.asc
Description:
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:50 AM, Peter Rockai (mornfall)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lainé wrote:
[...]
>> - the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes
>> (1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when
>> the final 1.0 vers
Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course.
>
> Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number.
I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number?
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:15:07PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
>
> That would be the [1]key signing coordination page.
>
> K.
>
> [1] http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
>
Okies! Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Zakame
--
|=-ZAK B. ELEP (Registered Linux
Name: knoda
Licence: GPL
Short description: knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on
hk_classes
Long description: http://www.knoda.org/
Where can the package be obtained: by emailing me.
more info:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=160321
signature.asc
Description: Ce
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:15:07PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
> That would be the [1]key signing coordination page.
>
> K.
>
> [1] http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
According to the Applicant's Checklist[1]:
> # The applicant's identity needs to be verified.
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Christoph Wegscheider wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course.
> >
> > Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number.
> I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number?
Indeed, in
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:16 AM, Christoph Wegscheider
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course.
>>
>> Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number.
> I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number?
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:32:32AM +0200, Stan Pinte wrote:
>Name: knoda
>Licence: GPL
>Short description: knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on
>hk_classes
>Long description: http://www.knoda.org/
>Where can the package be obtained: by emailing me.
Please post to the list the locat
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 04:55:42AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>I'm also searching a sponsor to upload UrlGfe (http://urlget.sf.net)
>packages from mentors.debian.org to debian unstable. UrlGfe is a
>graphical download manager, that's using GTK+ for its UI and the great
>libcurl for file downloadi
Hallo Lucas,
* Lucas Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-01 12:05]:
[...]
> >i dont no the url exactly, but search the debian.org website, there is a
> >site, where you can search for a dd in your environment.
> >try to search google for debian key signing program.
>
> that would be the [1]key sig
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:20:23AM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
>Hello!
>
>I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ (and I would like to start my NM
>application too). The will be available soon at :
>
> deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
You didn't put the following lines in debian
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 12:57:22AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:37:40 -0700, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> * Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28
>>> 22:21:14 +1000]:
>>>
I don'
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 07:42:34PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
>Package name: cc65
>Version : 2.10.1
>Upstream Author : Ullrich von Bassewitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>URL : http://www.cc65.org/
>License : zlib-alike
>Description : Cross deve
> You didn't put the following lines in debian/copyright (see [0] and
> [1]):
[...]
> grep -ri copyright akregator-1.0_beta4fixed/akregator/src/
very good point.
done
> Please consider to put the URL of the home page of the package in the
> description in debian/control. See [2] and [3].
done too
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:32:32AM +0200, Stan Pinte wrote:
> Name: knoda
> Licence: GPL
> Short description: knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on
> hk_classes
This description sucks. Don't start with the package name, it's too long,
and what is hk_classes (and why should I, as a
* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-01 13:58:04 +0200]:
> That is a solid RFS!
>
> I still didn't made time to check it out
> and will not able the next few days.
>
> Try to find a sponsor at Debian mailinglist that have
> interrest in other architectures and/or embedded application.
>
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-01 00:57:22 -0500]:
> > Maybe kernel-package?
Exactly. That's the best place for it IMHO.
> Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
> ketchup do?
Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm),
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 07:42:34PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
[snip]
> I was digging around trying to find a useful emulation-related utilities
> after my failed attempt at packaging Gens due to legal issues[0], and
> somebody pointed me to this little gem. At first it appeared that it was
>
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
ketchup do?
Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm), compiles and install it as far as I remember correctly.
Actually, it only fetches the required patches, verifi
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:32:08PM +, Jack Wasey wrote:
> Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> >
> >>Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
> >> ketchup do?
> >
> > Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
> > -pre, -mm), compiles and install it as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|
| I'll have a look at this package this weekend, and if everything is ok,
| I'll sponsor you. I've got 16 years of experience with 6510-assembly,
| which should be enough... Granted, I haven't done any
| 65816-programming.
|
|
| Regards: David Weine
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 02:46:10PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> |
> | I'll have a look at this package this weekend, and if everything is ok,
> | I'll sponsor you. I've got 16 years of experience with 6510-assembly,
> | which should be enough
Hi Michael (and d-mentors),
> All issues are fixed and updated packages are available:
> deb http://www.teco.edu/~biebl/debian/ unstable main
I am going to sponsor.
I've uploaded to anonymous-ftp-master.
--
ARAKI Yasuhiro
A Debian Official Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
I sent this message to the sasl2-bin package maintainer, but I suspect
he's really busy. I haven't received a response.
I'm not sure whether to open a bug, because I don't understand the
problem. I can't reproduce the problem with the sasl2-bin binary
package, compiling the source package on my
58 matches
Mail list logo
