Hello Debian Mentors,
I'm the package maintainer for drbd. Here is the situation.
Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new
version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd like to package the new
0.7.x version in debian, but keep the 0.6.x series in Debian as well.
How shoul
> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new
> version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd like to package the
> new 0.7.x version in debian, but keep the 0.6.x series in Debian as
> well. How should I go about this?
If the 0.7.x series is going to be the development versi
Jeremy Lainé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new
>> version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd like to package the
>> new 0.7.x version in debian, but keep the 0.6.x series in Debian as
>> well. How should I go about this?
>
> If the
Hello
I want to make deb packages of some programs that I use (quake2 dday mod).
I saw that source packages need *-dev packages to be built. These -dev
packages only contain header files, or something more?
I need a quake2-dev to start trying to make my quake2 dday mod deb package,
but it do
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 06:07:57AM -0400, Alejandro Arrieta Rios wrote:
>Hello
>
>I want to make deb packages of some programs that I use (quake2 dday mod).
>I saw that source packages need *-dev packages to be built. These -dev
>packages only contain header files, or something more?
>I need a
Hello David,
* David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-17 15:59]:
> I'm the package maintainer for drbd. Here is the situation.
> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new
> version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd like to package the new
> 0.7.x version in debian,
Dear mentors,
wanna sing karaoke?
If so I'd be pleased to find someone to upload this package to the
archives and thus assist me in fixing some (11, sort of, that is)
bugs.
This is an RFS for an ITA[0], I have packaged the newest upstream and
I believe this packaging fixes all outstanding bugs[1
+
HOT STOCK FOR MONDAY MORNING May 17th, 2004
CSRZ.PK IS EXPECTED TO EXPLODE, GET IT IMMEDIATELY!
+
Our last profitable offers:
> DCZ - we profiled at 60 cents and it went to $1.20
On Monday 17 May 2004 03:30, Greg Deitrick wrote:
> Looking at the man pages for various library calls it appears that
> tmpfile(3) is probably an acceptable means of creating a temporary file,
> but this returns a FILE *. The upstram source I'm packaging needs to make
> a temporary fifo. It use
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:02, Will Newton wrote:
> On Monday 17 May 2004 03:30, Greg Deitrick wrote:
>
> > Looking at the man pages for various library calls it appears that
> > tmpfile(3) is probably an acceptable means of creating a temporary file,
> > but this returns a FILE *. The upstram sour
James Damour wrote[Tue, May 11, 2004 at 08:25:52AM -0400]:
I would appreciate it if a sponsor could review my packaging, and let me
know what I should change in order to get it ready for upload to the
Debian archive. I've fixed all lintian or linda errors, and the
remaining linda warning may
On Monday 17 May 2004 19:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Codswallop! That would be d-s-*announce*, which is moderated anyway. (Or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is an alias as opposed to a list).
My apologies. I was thinking of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:02, Will Newton wrote:
[...]
> > debian-security is an inappropriate address to sent this type of query to.
> > It
> > is intended for security advisories and alerts.
>
> Codswallop! That would be d-s-*announce*, whic
On 2004-05-17 "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:02, Will Newton wrote:
> [...]
> > > debian-security is an inappropriate address to sent this type of
> > > query to. It is intended for security advisories
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello David,
>
> * David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-17 15:59]:
>> I'm the package maintainer for drbd. Here is the situation.
>> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new
>> version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd li
On 2004-05-17 David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-17 15:59]:
> >> I'm the package maintainer for drbd. Here is the situation.
> >> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new
> >> v
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 20:15, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-05-17 "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Or, indeed, [EMAIL PROTECTED], which has the same destination as
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] afaik.
> [...]
>
> No (unless this has changed recently without me noticing),
> [EMAIL P
Believe in soul mates? A friend has set you up with someone special.
http://lonelyenough.com/confirm/?oc=50793336
The FREE dating web site
CREATED BY WOMEN
Don't want these notifications?
http://lonelyenough.com/remove/?oc=50793336
iextracurriculartalismanic goethe
Jacqueline Mayer,)
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] will all0w you to receive
all the [EMAIL PROTECTED] that you 0rder with your remote contr0l,?
payperviews,XXX-movies,sp0rt events,special-events%,RND_SYB
http://www.9006hosting.com/cable/
needful ,battlefront
,eaton ,walnut .
> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new
> version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd like to package the
> new 0.7.x version in debian, but keep the 0.6.x series in Debian as
> well. How should I go about this?
If the 0.7.x series is going to be the development versi
Jeremy Lainà <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new
>> version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd like to package the
>> new 0.7.x version in debian, but keep the 0.6.x series in Debian as
>> well. How should I go about this?
>
> If the
Hello
I want to make deb packages of some programs that I use (quake2 dday mod).
I saw that source packages need *-dev packages to be built. These -dev
packages only contain header files, or something more?
I need a quake2-dev to start trying to make my quake2 dday mod deb package,
but it do
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 06:07:57AM -0400, Alejandro Arrieta Rios wrote:
>Hello
>
>I want to make deb packages of some programs that I use (quake2 dday mod).
>I saw that source packages need *-dev packages to be built. These -dev
>packages only contain header files, or something more?
>I need a
Hello David,
* David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-17 15:59]:
> I'm the package maintainer for drbd. Here is the situation.
> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new
> version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd like to package the new
> 0.7.x version in debian,
Dear mentors,
wanna sing karaoke?
If so I'd be pleased to find someone to upload this package to the
archives and thus assist me in fixing some (11, sort of, that is)
bugs.
This is an RFS for an ITA[0], I have packaged the newest upstream and
I believe this packaging fixes all outstanding bugs[1
+
HOT STOCK FOR MONDAY MORNING May 17th, 2004
CSRZ.PK IS EXPECTED TO EXPLODE, GET IT IMMEDIATELY!
+
Our last profitable offers:
> DCZ - we profiled at 60 cents and it went to $1.20
On Monday 17 May 2004 03:30, Greg Deitrick wrote:
> Looking at the man pages for various library calls it appears that
> tmpfile(3) is probably an acceptable means of creating a temporary file,
> but this returns a FILE *. The upstram source I'm packaging needs to make
> a temporary fifo. It use
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:02, Will Newton wrote:
> On Monday 17 May 2004 03:30, Greg Deitrick wrote:
>
> > Looking at the man pages for various library calls it appears that
> > tmpfile(3) is probably an acceptable means of creating a temporary file,
> > but this returns a FILE *. The upstram sour
James Damour wrote[Tue, May 11, 2004 at 08:25:52AM -0400]:
I would appreciate it if a sponsor could review my packaging, and let me
know what I should change in order to get it ready for upload to the
Debian archive. I've fixed all lintian or linda errors, and the
remaining linda warning may be a
On Monday 17 May 2004 19:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Codswallop! That would be d-s-*announce*, which is moderated anyway. (Or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is an alias as opposed to a list).
My apologies. I was thinking of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:02, Will Newton wrote:
[...]
> > debian-security is an inappropriate address to sent this type of query to. It
> > is intended for security advisories and alerts.
>
> Codswallop! That would be d-s-*announce*, which is
On 2004-05-17 "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:02, Will Newton wrote:
> [...]
> > > debian-security is an inappropriate address to sent this type of
> > > query to. It is intended for security advisories
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello David,
>
> * David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-17 15:59]:
>> I'm the package maintainer for drbd. Here is the situation.
>> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new
>> version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd li
On 2004-05-17 David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-17 15:59]:
> >> I'm the package maintainer for drbd. Here is the situation.
> >> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new
> >> v
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 20:15, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-05-17 "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Or, indeed, [EMAIL PROTECTED], which has the same destination as
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] afaik.
> [...]
>
> No (unless this has changed recently without me noticing),
> [EMAIL P
Believe in soul mates? A friend has set you up with someone special.
http://lonelyenough.com/confirm/?oc=50793336
The FREE dating web site
CREATED BY WOMEN
Don't want these notifications?
http://lonelyenough.com/remove/?oc=50793336
iextracurriculartalismanic goethe
Jacqueline Mayer,)
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] will all0w you to receive
all the [EMAIL PROTECTED] that you 0rder with your remote contr0l,?
payperviews,XXX-movies,sp0rt events,special-events%,RND_SYB
http://www.9006hosting.com/cable/
needful ,battlefront
,eaton ,walnut .
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
37 matches
Mail list logo
