Re: RFS: xhangglider package uploaded to mentors

2004-02-18 Thread Rudy Godoy
El día 17/02/2004 a 03:05 Joshua Kwan escribio ... Hi, > 1) You should work the build system so that the binary and manpage are > built in the build-stamp target. > Done, I'm building only binary on build-stamp checking the .orig there's no manpage for build, and original Makefile has a install

Failed build on alpha, would like to investigate

2004-02-18 Thread Philipp Frauenfelder
Hi I have a package that fails to build on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=blacs-mpi&ver=1.1-20&arch=alpha&stamp=1076341567&file=log&as=raw I guess it is a missing library and I would like to investigate it on an alpha machine. I have tried on escher (it has unstable chroots availa

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

2004-02-18 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 19.52, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Having a new-maintainer keyring, to which keys could get added by any > > AM after it has been verified, and checking the signature on the dsc > > files against it sounds good to. And the keyring would be us

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

2004-02-18 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >There are many people who got a signature by a DD's key who are not applying >for DDship, probably never will, and who probably should not be able to >upload to your queue. Getting a signature is just a confirmation of identity, >afte

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

2004-02-18 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:45:00AM -0700, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > > The final question I'd like feedback on is this: how many sponsors > > would consider pointing their sponsees to this service, rather than > > whatever methods you're using now? The benefits are that other > > sponsors might occ

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

2004-02-18 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:22:22AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > On Tuesday 17 February 2004 19.52, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > Having a new-maintainer keyring, to which keys could get added by any > > > AM after it has been verified, and che

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

2004-02-18 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi. Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >2) Download tracking, both by count and "yes I'll upload this" via web >browser. I'm still up in the air about whether there will be apt-getable >resources, or whether pre-built binary debs will be accessable. I don't >particularly want to be a gene

Re: Failed build on alpha, would like to investigate

2004-02-18 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:21:18AM +0100, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote: > > I guess it is a missing library and I would like to investigate > it on an alpha machine. I have tried on escher (it has unstable > chroots available) but it lacks some packages which mine build > depends on. > > How can I

Re: xmail package updated

2004-02-18 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 09:52:19PM +0200, Radu Spineanu wrote: > > Also i didn't get any responses from any D-D. I > must understand > that nobody is interested :) ? > Ok, I'll see that. Stay tuned. -- Francesco P. Lovergine

Re: Failed build on alpha, would like to investigate

2004-02-18 Thread Martin Albert
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 09:21, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote: > How can I install the missing dependecies? Or is there an other Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] martin

Re: Failed build on alpha, would like to investigate

2004-02-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:21:18AM +0100, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote: > I have a package that fails to build on alpha: > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=blacs-mpi&ver=1.1-20&arch=alpha&stamp=1076341567&file=log&as=raw > I guess it is a missing library and I would like to investigate > it o

pgAdmin3 packaging issue / Static link

2004-02-18 Thread Raphaël Enrici
Dear debian mentors, pgAdmin3 (http://www.pgadmin.org) is a graphical administration interface for PostgreSQL based on wxWindows (http://www.wxwindows.org). The product is built against a wxWindows version 2.5.x with specific patches from upstream pgAdmin3 developers applied. As of the discuss

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

2004-02-18 Thread Joey Hess
Matthew Palmer wrote: > So, comments, brickbats, acclaim, whatever. Throw it at me. Well I don't think that this system as described would be of any use to me. I want to maintain a close relationship with the people whose package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a package

RFS: sponsor for pftp package.

2004-02-18 Thread Francisco García
Hello, The debian package called pftp is actually orphan, (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=206119). I have package this software, and i'm looking for a sponsor for it. This software is released under the GPL, and you can know more about it here: http://www.pftp.de Descrip

RFS: irssi-scripts -- useful collection of scripts for irssi

2004-02-18 Thread Florian Ernst
Dear Mentors, [CC to the original maintainer] I sincerely hope that particular spell on me is lifted (recently I've written four mails to DDs and haven't recieved any response yet)... My short-term goal is to simply maintain the orphaned[1] package irssi-scripts[2] whereas in the long run I'd a

Re: RFS: sponsor for pftp package.

2004-02-18 Thread Michael Schiansky
Hi Francisco! On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:12:56AM +0100, Francisco García wrote: > The debian package called pftp is actually orphan, > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=206119). > > I have package this software, and i'm looking for a sponsor for it. i just looked at your url be

Re: RFS: xhangglider package uploaded to mentors

2004-02-18 Thread Rudy Godoy
El día 17/02/2004 a 03:05 Joshua Kwan escribio ... Hi, > 1) You should work the build system so that the binary and manpage are > built in the build-stamp target. > Done, I'm building only binary on build-stamp checking the .orig there's no manpage for build, and original Makefile has a install

Failed build on alpha, would like to investigate

2004-02-18 Thread Philipp Frauenfelder
Hi I have a package that fails to build on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=blacs-mpi&ver=1.1-20&arch=alpha&stamp=1076341567&file=log&as=raw I guess it is a missing library and I would like to investigate it on an alpha machine. I have tried on escher (it has unstable chroots availa

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

2004-02-18 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 19.52, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Having a new-maintainer keyring, to which keys could get added by any > > AM after it has been verified, and checking the signature on the dsc > > files against it sounds good to. And the keyring would be us

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

2004-02-18 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >There are many people who got a signature by a DD's key who are not applying >for DDship, probably never will, and who probably should not be able to >upload to your queue. Getting a signature is just a confirmation of identity, >afte

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

2004-02-18 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:45:00AM -0700, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > > The final question I'd like feedback on is this: how many sponsors > > would consider pointing their sponsees to this service, rather than > > whatever methods you're using now? The benefits are that other > > sponsors might occ

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

2004-02-18 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:22:22AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > On Tuesday 17 February 2004 19.52, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > Having a new-maintainer keyring, to which keys could get added by any > > > AM after it has been verified, and chec

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

2004-02-18 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi. Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >2) Download tracking, both by count and "yes I'll upload this" via web >browser. I'm still up in the air about whether there will be apt-getable >resources, or whether pre-built binary debs will be accessable. I don't >particularly want to be a gene

Re: Failed build on alpha, would like to investigate

2004-02-18 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:21:18AM +0100, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote: > > I guess it is a missing library and I would like to investigate > it on an alpha machine. I have tried on escher (it has unstable > chroots available) but it lacks some packages which mine build > depends on. > > How can I

Re: xmail package updated

2004-02-18 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 09:52:19PM +0200, Radu Spineanu wrote: > > Also i didn't get any responses from any D-D. I > must understand > that nobody is interested :) ? > Ok, I'll see that. Stay tuned. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject o

Re: Failed build on alpha, would like to investigate

2004-02-18 Thread Martin Albert
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 09:21, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote: > How can I install the missing dependecies? Or is there an other Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Failed build on alpha, would like to investigate

2004-02-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:21:18AM +0100, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote: > I have a package that fails to build on alpha: > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=blacs-mpi&ver=1.1-20&arch=alpha&stamp=1076341567&file=log&as=raw > I guess it is a missing library and I would like to investigate > it o

pgAdmin3 packaging issue / Static link

2004-02-18 Thread Raphaël Enrici
Dear debian mentors, pgAdmin3 (http://www.pgadmin.org) is a graphical administration interface for PostgreSQL based on wxWindows (http://www.wxwindows.org). The product is built against a wxWindows version 2.5.x with specific patches from upstream pgAdmin3 developers applied. As of the discussi

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

2004-02-18 Thread Joey Hess
Matthew Palmer wrote: > So, comments, brickbats, acclaim, whatever. Throw it at me. Well I don't think that this system as described would be of any use to me. I want to maintain a close relationship with the people whose package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a package

RFS: sponsor for pftp package.

2004-02-18 Thread Francisco García
Hello, The debian package called pftp is actually orphan, (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=206119). I have package this software, and i'm looking for a sponsor for it. This software is released under the GPL, and you can know more about it here: http://www.pftp.de Descrip

RFS: irssi-scripts -- useful collection of scripts for irssi

2004-02-18 Thread Florian Ernst
Dear Mentors, [CC to the original maintainer] I sincerely hope that particular spell on me is lifted (recently I've written four mails to DDs and haven't recieved any response yet)... My short-term goal is to simply maintain the orphaned[1] package irssi-scripts[2] whereas in the long run I'd als

Re: RFS: sponsor for pftp package.

2004-02-18 Thread Michael Schiansky
Hi Francisco! On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:12:56AM +0100, Francisco García wrote: > The debian package called pftp is actually orphan, > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=206119). > > I have package this software, and i'm looking for a sponsor for it. i just looked at your url be

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

2004-02-18 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:21:11PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Matthew Palmer wrote: > > So, comments, brickbats, acclaim, whatever. Throw it at me. > > Well I don't think that this system as described would be of any use to > me. I want to maintain a close relationship with the people whose A wor