Hi there, as i've said before [0] I'm willing to adpot xhangglider, I've
worked on the package and I've finally uploaded [1] to mentors.debian.net.
If there's anybody who wants to sponsor this package I'll appreciate to take
a look on it and let me know.
regards,
Rudy
0-
http://lists.debian.org/
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 01:54:57AM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> Hi there, as i've said before [0] I'm willing to adpot xhangglider, I've
> worked on the package and I've finally uploaded [1] to mentors.debian.net.
> If there's anybody who wants to sponsor this package I'll appreciate to take
> a look
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:07:28AM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> 2) You should remove Makefile from the orig.tar.gz in the clean target at
> some point and upload a new one. Currently, refreshing the Makefile that
> came in the orig.tar.gz causes major diff.gz bloat:
Huh? I haven't looked at this, b
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:16:17AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Huh? I haven't looked at this, but why would one generate a new
> .orig.tar.gz that isn't original? .diff.gz bloat is to be lived with.
I guess the line between keeping the diff.gz bloat and orig.tar.gz
constant with upstream is a gra
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 02:42:20AM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:16:17AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Huh? I haven't looked at this, but why would one generate a new
> > .orig.tar.gz that isn't original? .diff.gz bloat is to be lived with.
>
> I guess the line between ke
hello
I have to apply a small patch to my xmail package,
however
i ran into different opinions while looking on how
to do this.
Some suggested dbs, others dpatch, others just
applying the
patch dirrectly to the source.
I would like xmail to be part of debian ( in case
someone
decides to
Prompted by a comment made by one of my potential sponsees, I've been
reworking my semi-automated sponsorship queue from a "helps me" thing to a
"could help lots of people" thing. The comment was along the lines of
"wouldn't it be cool if we could remove the SPOF of sponsors, and have a
group of p
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:04:39PM +0200, Radu Spineanu wrote:
> I have to apply a small patch to my xmail package,
> however
> i ran into different opinions while looking on how
> to do this.
> Some suggested dbs, others dpatch, others just
> applying the
> patch dirrectly to the source.
>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:04:39PM +0200, Radu Spineanu wrote:
> hello
>
> I have to apply a small patch to my xmail package,
> however
> i ran into different opinions while looking on how
> to do this.
> Some suggested dbs, others dpatch, others just
> applying the
> patch dirrectly to the
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:57:55PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> The final question I'd like feedback on is this: how many sponsors
> would consider pointing their sponsees to this service, rather than
> whatever methods you're using now? The benefits are that other
> sponsors might occasional
Magosányi Árpád <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> There are some files in /etc which are actually data files representing
> the state of the system. Like /etc/mtab, /etc/network/ifstate, or
The BTS has several patches for mount that allow /etc/mtab to be a
link to another file. Thats an exte
John Belmonte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Not being much of a buildd expert, I'm wondering what is keeping my
> xmlsec1 package from entering testing. There was a problem with the
> s390 build attempted Feb 05: "libgnutls10-dev missing". However, I
> see that the s390 binary of lib
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Prompted by a comment made by one of my potential sponsees, I've been
> reworking my semi-automated sponsorship queue from a "helps me" thing to a
> "could help lots of people" thing. The comment was along the lines of
> "wouldn't it be cool if we coul
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Having a new-maintainer keyring, to which keys could get added by any
> AM after it has been verified, and checking the signature on the dsc
> files against it sounds good to. And the keyring would be usefull for
> other purposes too.
Why not just check if the key is
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Magosányi Árpád <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > There are some files in /etc which are actually data files representing
> > the state of the system. Like /etc/mtab, /etc/network/ifstate, or
>
> The BTS has several patches for moun
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Having a new-maintainer keyring, to which keys could get added by any
> > AM after it has been verified, and checking the signature on the dsc
> > files against it sounds good to. And the keyring would be usefull for
> >
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>>>Having a new-maintainer keyring, to which keys could get added by any
>>>AM after it has been verified, and checking the signature on the dsc
>>>files against it sounds good to. And t
Hello to all
Since it was a very small patch (it added 2 lines)
i decided to
apply it just like that.
deb http://k9.bizland.ro/xmail ./
deb-src http://k9.bizland.ro/xmail ./
Linda returns an error that is misses a man page
for a binary
but that is a script that makes sendmail.xmail
work
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:11:08PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Prompted by a comment made by one of my potential sponsees, I've been
> > reworking my semi-automated sponsorship queue from a "helps me" thing to a
> > "could help lots of people" thing. The comment was along the lines of
>
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >>
> >>>Having a new-maintainer keyring, to which keys could get added by any
> >>>AM after it has been verified, and checking the s
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:11:08PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Prompted by a comment made by one of my potential sponsees, I've been
> > > reworking my semi-automated sponsorship queue from a "helps me" thing to a
> > > "could help lots of
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 01:54:57AM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> Hi there, as i've said before [0] I'm willing to adpot xhangglider, I've
> worked on the package and I've finally uploaded [1] to mentors.debian.net.
> If there's anybody who wants to sponsor this package I'll appreciate to take
> a look
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:07:28AM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> 2) You should remove Makefile from the orig.tar.gz in the clean target at
> some point and upload a new one. Currently, refreshing the Makefile that
> came in the orig.tar.gz causes major diff.gz bloat:
Huh? I haven't looked at this, b
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:16:17AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Huh? I haven't looked at this, but why would one generate a new
> .orig.tar.gz that isn't original? .diff.gz bloat is to be lived with.
I guess the line between keeping the diff.gz bloat and orig.tar.gz
constant with upstream is a gra
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 02:42:20AM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:16:17AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Huh? I haven't looked at this, but why would one generate a new
> > .orig.tar.gz that isn't original? .diff.gz bloat is to be lived with.
>
> I guess the line between ke
hello
I have to apply a small patch to my xmail package,
however
i ran into different opinions while looking on how
to do this.
Some suggested dbs, others dpatch, others just
applying the
patch dirrectly to the source.
I would like xmail to be part of debian ( in case
someone
decides to
Prompted by a comment made by one of my potential sponsees, I've been
reworking my semi-automated sponsorship queue from a "helps me" thing to a
"could help lots of people" thing. The comment was along the lines of
"wouldn't it be cool if we could remove the SPOF of sponsors, and have a
group of p
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:04:39PM +0200, Radu Spineanu wrote:
> I have to apply a small patch to my xmail package,
> however
> i ran into different opinions while looking on how
> to do this.
> Some suggested dbs, others dpatch, others just
> applying the
> patch dirrectly to the source.
>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:04:39PM +0200, Radu Spineanu wrote:
> hello
>
> I have to apply a small patch to my xmail package,
> however
> i ran into different opinions while looking on how
> to do this.
> Some suggested dbs, others dpatch, others just
> applying the
> patch dirrectly to the
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:57:55PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> The final question I'd like feedback on is this: how many sponsors
> would consider pointing their sponsees to this service, rather than
> whatever methods you're using now? The benefits are that other
> sponsors might occasional
Magosányi Árpád <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> There are some files in /etc which are actually data files representing
> the state of the system. Like /etc/mtab, /etc/network/ifstate, or
The BTS has several patches for mount that allow /etc/mtab to be a
link to another file. Thats an exte
John Belmonte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Not being much of a buildd expert, I'm wondering what is keeping my
> xmlsec1 package from entering testing. There was a problem with the
> s390 build attempted Feb 05: "libgnutls10-dev missing". However, I
> see that the s390 binary of lib
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Prompted by a comment made by one of my potential sponsees, I've been
> reworking my semi-automated sponsorship queue from a "helps me" thing to a
> "could help lots of people" thing. The comment was along the lines of
> "wouldn't it be cool if we coul
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Having a new-maintainer keyring, to which keys could get added by any
> AM after it has been verified, and checking the signature on the dsc
> files against it sounds good to. And the keyring would be usefull for
> other purposes too.
Why not just check if the key is
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Magosányi Árpád <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > There are some files in /etc which are actually data files representing
> > the state of the system. Like /etc/mtab, /etc/network/ifstate, or
>
> The BTS has several patches for moun
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Having a new-maintainer keyring, to which keys could get added by any
> > AM after it has been verified, and checking the signature on the dsc
> > files against it sounds good to. And the keyring would be usefull for
> >
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>>>Having a new-maintainer keyring, to which keys could get added by any
>>>AM after it has been verified, and checking the signature on the dsc
>>>files against it sounds good to. And t
Hello to all
Since it was a very small patch (it added 2 lines)
i decided to
apply it just like that.
deb http://k9.bizland.ro/xmail ./
deb-src http://k9.bizland.ro/xmail ./
Linda returns an error that is misses a man page
for a binary
but that is a script that makes sendmail.xmail
work
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:11:08PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Prompted by a comment made by one of my potential sponsees, I've been
> > reworking my semi-automated sponsorship queue from a "helps me" thing to a
> > "could help lots of people" thing. The comment was along the lines of
>
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >>
> >>>Having a new-maintainer keyring, to which keys could get added by any
> >>>AM after it has been verified, and checking the s
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:11:08PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Prompted by a comment made by one of my potential sponsees, I've been
> > > reworking my semi-automated sponsorship queue from a "helps me" thing to a
> > > "could help lots of
41 matches
Mail list logo
