On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 14:42:48 +0900, Junichi Uekawa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Lintian, however, can't know that this particular library usually is
>> preloaded, not linked to. Hence the override.
>
>If its use is going to be something like that, please don't put it in
>/usr/lib. That's what the
Hi Matt.
Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>In the case of software for Palmpilots and whatnot, unless a DD has
>compatible hardware, they can't test it. (Incidentally, if someone really
>wants to get pose in, they can donate a Palm to me and I'll happily test and
>sponsor).
POSE is an e
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-29 01:31]:
> > > You won't be approved with no package in the archive.
> >
> > bullshit
>
> It _is_ so.
> Definitely.
If you want to join Debian as a package maintainer, there is clearly
no good reason for not having a package in the archive. Only t
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:28:32AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
hi,
> Try "lintian -i". You've probably left "Author(s):" in there. As it is
> decidable
> whether there's one or many copyright holders, you should either erase the
> "(s)" or
> just remove parantheses, depending on what follows.
Hi,
users working with Debian woody often do not look at archived bugs when
reporting bugs on a package. Therefore it is likely that bugs that have
long been fixed in unstable, but will never be in woody will be reported
multiple times again.
Therefore on debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org it wa
On 2003-07-29, 01:35 GMT, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:20:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would
>> like to sponsor me?
> [...]
>> All relevant files are on
>> ftp://ftp.ceplovi.cz/data/www/ceplovi/matej/progs/debian
On 29.07.03 15:20 Frank Küster wrote:
users working with Debian woody often do not look at archived bugs when
reporting bugs on a package. Therefore it is likely that bugs that have
long been fixed in unstable, but will never be in woody will be reported
multiple times again.
Therefore on debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I'm looking for a sponsor. I have the following package ready for
examination:
POPFile is an email classification tool with a Naive Bayes classifier, a POP3
proxy and a web interface. It runs on most platforms and with most email
cli
Suppose there is a package foobar that depends on a library libfoo. AIUI,
whenever the SONAME changes, the library name should change, so I expect this
to evolve as libfoo1, libfoo2, etc. What are the proper control fields
(Depends, Conflicts, Replaces, Provides) for these packages? If I underst
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:06:38PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> Suppose there is a package foobar that depends on a library libfoo. AIUI,
> whenever the SONAME changes, the library name should change, so I expect
> this to evolve as libfoo1, libfoo2, etc. What are the proper control
> fields (Depe
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Frank Kuster wrote:
> >users working with Debian woody often do not look at archived bugs when
> >reporting bugs on a package. Therefore it is likely that bugs that have
> >long been fixed in unstable, but will never be in woody will be reported
> >multiple times again.
I
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>
> I am adopting wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data packages -- I've already
> debianized the newest upstream versions (2.9 and 0.80.0 respectively) and
> fixed a few outstanding bugs. Being a non-maintainer, I'll need a sponsor
> -- would anyone like to volunteer?
i have
Hi Matt.
Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>In the case of software for Palmpilots and whatnot, unless a DD has
>compatible hardware, they can't test it. (Incidentally, if someone really
>wants to get pose in, they can donate a Palm to me and I'll happily test and
>sponsor).
POSE is an e
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-29 01:31]:
> > > You won't be approved with no package in the archive.
> >
> > bullshit
>
> It _is_ so.
> Definitely.
If you want to join Debian as a package maintainer, there is clearly
no good reason for not having a package in the archive. Only t
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:28:32AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
hi,
> Try "lintian -i". You've probably left "Author(s):" in there. As it is decidable
> whether there's one or many copyright holders, you should either erase the "(s)" or
> just remove parantheses, depending on what follows.
fixe
Hi,
users working with Debian woody often do not look at archived bugs when
reporting bugs on a package. Therefore it is likely that bugs that have
long been fixed in unstable, but will never be in woody will be reported
multiple times again.
Therefore on [EMAIL PROTECTED] it was suggested to
kee
On 2003-07-29, 01:35 GMT, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:20:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would
>> like to sponsor me?
> [...]
>> All relevant files are on
>> ftp://ftp.ceplovi.cz/data/www/ceplovi/matej/progs/debian
On 29.07.03 15:20 Frank Küster wrote:
users working with Debian woody often do not look at archived bugs when
reporting bugs on a package. Therefore it is likely that bugs that have
long been fixed in unstable, but will never be in woody will be reported
multiple times again.
Therefore on [EMAIL PR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I'm looking for a sponsor. I have the following package ready for examination:
POPFile is an email classification tool with a Naive Bayes classifier, a POP3 proxy
and a web interface. It runs on most platforms and with most email clien
Suppose there is a package foobar that depends on a library libfoo. AIUI,
whenever the SONAME changes, the library name should change, so I expect this
to evolve as libfoo1, libfoo2, etc. What are the proper control fields
(Depends, Conflicts, Replaces, Provides) for these packages? If I underst
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:06:38PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> Suppose there is a package foobar that depends on a library libfoo. AIUI,
> whenever the SONAME changes, the library name should change, so I expect
> this to evolve as libfoo1, libfoo2, etc. What are the proper control
> fields (Depe
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Frank Kuster wrote:
> >users working with Debian woody often do not look at archived bugs when
> >reporting bugs on a package. Therefore it is likely that bugs that have
> >long been fixed in unstable, but will never be in woody will be reported
> >multiple times again.
I
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>
> I am adopting wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data packages -- I've already
> debianized the newest upstream versions (2.9 and 0.80.0 respectively) and
> fixed a few outstanding bugs. Being a non-maintainer, I'll need a sponsor
> -- would anyone like to volunteer?
i have
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 15:57 -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor. I have the following package ready for
> examination:
>
> POPFile is an email classification tool with a Naive Bayes classifier,
> a POP3 proxy and a web interface. It runs on most platforms and with
> mo
24 matches
Mail list logo
