On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> As far as I can tell, no modules depend on it - Maybe I am searching for
> this the wrong way, but...
There's an apt-cache command which shows reverse depends... Aah, there it
is, showpkg. Run that over any package, and it'll show you Reverse Depends
(am
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:41:00AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:35:43PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > > so... is there anything i can do other than putting some more
> > > documentation in /usr/share/doc?
> >
> > Err, README.Debian?
>
> that is what i was implying the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ian.
Ian Wilkinson wrote:
> I am currently the developer of a cgi application (BlueLava, if anyone's
> interested :-)). I've read as much as I can find about making .debs but
> I can find nothing about producing a none-architecture specific .deb.
P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package.
The addition of libchipcard to Debian would substantially increase the number of
users benefitting from gnucash's hbci (home banking) extensions (cf. packages
gnucash-hbci, libopenhbci, and bug
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:21:32AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:41:00AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> > that is what i was implying there, but was wondering if there was
> > something *other* than that :) but with the above suggestion, i think
> > it'll be moot, so thanks ag
Hello,
I ITP'ed FXRuby (libfox-ruby) some time ago. But in the meantime I've
been cought up in another project (typical ;) and also found unofficial
libfox-ruby packages[0] (for the unstable ruby interpreter). So I have
kind of lost interest in packaging it and want to RFP it instead as I
still li
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:22:30PM +0100, Jonas Fonseca wrote:
> Should I just file an RFP bug somehow or what should I do ?
Don't file a new one, retitle the old one to RFP.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi Jonas!
You wrote:
> Should I just file an RFP bug somehow or what should I do ?
Just retitle the existing bug to an RFP.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|--
Hi all
I'm trying to package a mozilla plugin (enigmail), but i have a
problem with build dependences because I need a precompiled mozilla tree.
I have several options.
Option a)
I omit the tar.gz sources and I use a xpi compiled by my own
The deb installs this xpi like the mozilla-locale p
Hi Chad
On Sonntag, 26. Januar 2003 23:55, Chad Miller wrote:
> This is something you should do if and when you're pretty sure that
> you don't want your work to be just exercise. There's nothing
> wrong with packaging something just for the experience, note; you
> don't have to be a package ma
Celso,
> Option c)
> Create a mozilla-dev? package and use this one like build dependence
Guess what? There is already a mozilla-dev package. :-)
Simon
--
GPG Fingerprint: 040E B5F7 84F1 4FBC CEAD ADC6 18A0 CC8D 5706 A4B4
msg08482/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:15:31PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I'm using dh_perl to calculate the package dependencies for a perl
> > script in the cupsys-driver-gimpprint package. I thought this was
> > working, but it's not getting the dependencies r
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:57:31PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > dh_perl doesn't (currently) attempt to calculate general module
> > dependencies, only core dependencies.
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> I guess that, due to the nature of the perl parser, adding this
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:25:46PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> Celso,
>
> > Option c)
> > Create a mozilla-dev? package and use this one like build dependence
>
> Guess what? There is already a mozilla-dev package. :-)
>
Ups :-)
Great but terrible, now I have to fight with a long Makefile
I
hey mentors
i'm working on a package that has a directory in /etc/sugarplum
and in this directory two conffiles and one other (empty) directory.
when i purge the package, i get:
balthasar[/home/seanius/sugarplum]13:17:02# dpkg --purge sugarplum
(Reading database ... 69541 files and directories cu
Colin Watson wrote:
> I would use the various introspection-related modules to do this (maybe
> Devel::Symdump or B?), but it's not possible to get it reliably correct
> automatically. I think there are plenty of not-particularly-pathological
> scripts and modules in the distribution that would eas
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:55:53PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Yes, it's very hard to get right and even if you do, mostly, there is
> still the issue of mapping perl modules into debian packages, which
> would be hard for debhelper to do, as it would have to depend on having
Mapping from a perl
Steve Kemp wrote:
> Mapping from a perl module to a Debian package should be trivial,
> I would have thought.
>
> Given the system upon which dh_perl would be run would have the
> modules installed it should be a simple matter of running
> 'dpkg --search path/to/perl/module.pm' - or am I mi
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 05:00:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> The module package may not even be installed, the module may be used
> conditionally, a versioned dependency may be needed, multiple packages
> may provide the same module (and a dependency on a virtual package or an
> ored dependency ne
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:39:43PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> i'm working on a package that has a directory in /etc/sugarplum
> and in this directory two conffiles and one other (empty) directory.
> when i purge the package, i get:
>
> balthasar[/home/seanius/sugarplum]13:17:02# dpkg --purge sug
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:35:43PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > i'm throwing together a cgi script package that requires certain
> > lines be added to the apache configuration file on the webserver
> > in order to work, so there's no way it can work out of the box as
> > far as i can figure, at l
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> As far as I can tell, no modules depend on it - Maybe I am searching for
> this the wrong way, but...
There's an apt-cache command which shows reverse depends... Aah, there it
is, showpkg. Run that over any package, and it'll show you Reverse Depends
(am
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:41:00AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:35:43PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > > so... is there anything i can do other than putting some more
> > > documentation in /usr/share/doc?
> >
> > Err, README.Debian?
>
> that is what i was implying the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ian.
Ian Wilkinson wrote:
> I am currently the developer of a cgi application (BlueLava, if anyone's
> interested :-)). I've read as much as I can find about making .debs but
> I can find nothing about producing a none-architecture specific .deb.
P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package.
The addition of libchipcard to Debian would substantially increase the number of
users benefitting from gnucash's hbci (home banking) extensions (cf. packages
gnucash-hbci, libopenhbci, and bug
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:21:32AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:41:00AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> > that is what i was implying there, but was wondering if there was
> > something *other* than that :) but with the above suggestion, i think
> > it'll be moot, so thanks ag
Hello,
I ITP'ed FXRuby (libfox-ruby) some time ago. But in the meantime I've
been cought up in another project (typical ;) and also found unofficial
libfox-ruby packages[0] (for the unstable ruby interpreter). So I have
kind of lost interest in packaging it and want to RFP it instead as I
still li
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:22:30PM +0100, Jonas Fonseca wrote:
> Should I just file an RFP bug somehow or what should I do ?
Don't file a new one, retitle the old one to RFP.
Michael
Hi Jonas!
You wrote:
> Should I just file an RFP bug somehow or what should I do ?
Just retitle the existing bug to an RFP.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|--
Hi all
I'm trying to package a mozilla plugin (enigmail), but i have a
problem with build dependences because I need a precompiled mozilla tree.
I have several options.
Option a)
I omit the tar.gz sources and I use a xpi compiled by my own
The deb installs this xpi like the mozilla-locale p
Hi Chad
On Sonntag, 26. Januar 2003 23:55, Chad Miller wrote:
> This is something you should do if and when you're pretty sure that
> you don't want your work to be just exercise. There's nothing
> wrong with packaging something just for the experience, note; you
> don't have to be a package ma
Celso,
> Option c)
> Create a mozilla-dev? package and use this one like build dependence
Guess what? There is already a mozilla-dev package. :-)
Simon
--
GPG Fingerprint: 040E B5F7 84F1 4FBC CEAD ADC6 18A0 CC8D 5706 A4B4
pgpBEej03Ntyk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:15:31PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I'm using dh_perl to calculate the package dependencies for a perl
> > script in the cupsys-driver-gimpprint package. I thought this was
> > working, but it's not getting the dependencies r
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:57:31PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > dh_perl doesn't (currently) attempt to calculate general module
> > dependencies, only core dependencies.
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> I guess that, due to the nature of the perl parser, adding this
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:25:46PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> Celso,
>
> > Option c)
> > Create a mozilla-dev? package and use this one like build dependence
>
> Guess what? There is already a mozilla-dev package. :-)
>
Ups :-)
Great but terrible, now I have to fight with a long Makefile
I
hey mentors
i'm working on a package that has a directory in /etc/sugarplum
and in this directory two conffiles and one other (empty) directory.
when i purge the package, i get:
balthasar[/home/seanius/sugarplum]13:17:02# dpkg --purge sugarplum
(Reading database ... 69541 files and directories cu
Colin Watson wrote:
> I would use the various introspection-related modules to do this (maybe
> Devel::Symdump or B?), but it's not possible to get it reliably correct
> automatically. I think there are plenty of not-particularly-pathological
> scripts and modules in the distribution that would eas
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:55:53PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Yes, it's very hard to get right and even if you do, mostly, there is
> still the issue of mapping perl modules into debian packages, which
> would be hard for debhelper to do, as it would have to depend on having
Mapping from a perl
Steve Kemp wrote:
> Mapping from a perl module to a Debian package should be trivial,
> I would have thought.
>
> Given the system upon which dh_perl would be run would have the
> modules installed it should be a simple matter of running
> 'dpkg --search path/to/perl/module.pm' - or am I mi
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 05:00:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> The module package may not even be installed, the module may be used
> conditionally, a versioned dependency may be needed, multiple packages
> may provide the same module (and a dependency on a virtual package or an
> ored dependency ne
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:39:43PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> i'm working on a package that has a directory in /etc/sugarplum
> and in this directory two conffiles and one other (empty) directory.
> when i purge the package, i get:
>
> balthasar[/home/seanius/sugarplum]13:17:02# dpkg --purge sug
sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hey -mentors
>
> i'm throwing together a cgi script package that requires certain
> lines be added to the apache configuration file on the webserver
> in order to work, so there's no way it can work out of the box as
> far as i can figure, at least until a
42 matches
Mail list logo
