Hello,
I' d like to become a Debian maintainer. Meanwhile, I have packaged
Blassic :
http://www.arrakis.es/~ninsesabe/blassic/
a classic BASIC interpreter, and am looking for a sponsor.
You can get the .deb here :
http://www.chez.com/mathys/deb.html
Thanks
Antoine Mathys
--
To UNSUBSCRI
hi
try using the 'printtool' package
(unfortunately the printer autoconfiguration is broken in Woody
- my fault- so you may wish to get the packages that are in unstable
or in http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/GNULpr
)
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 11:51:39AM -0600, Clare Jarvis wrote:
> Does anybody use th
I have managed, despite of my lack of time and my girlfriend ;) to
finish a beta version (?) of the OpenEXR packages.
Feel free to break them:
http://genarin.hispalinux.es/~data/
They are lintian clean, but linda reports an odd error.
I had a bit of troubles tracking down to bugs already repor
Hi,
John Tatum here, better known online as slidesinger. I am still
learning linux and in no way do I consider myself an expert, but I am
teachable, can read documentation, and have a great deal of non-linux
computer knowledge.
My programming experience is limited to System 360 mainframes wri
Hi,
I have made a package for this distributed computation daemon, that
helps research on protein folding. I would be glad to get comments to
make it better. Would somebody be ready to sponsor me for applying as a
debian developer?
The original tar file is huge (22MB) because it contains the
Chad Miller wrote:
> Sure, all of these may not seem as "sexy" as uploading
> a package you create, but it sure helps Debian more.
Well, I really do not care about sexyness of my work. I have just
participated in the development of the program (actually, it is
just a script for vim), which seems t
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:38:10PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> The original tar file is huge (22MB) because it contains the (big)
> binaries for three architectures (i386, powerpc and hppa).
The software is binary-only ? In that case, it can never become a Debian
package itself, at most an in
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:38:10PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> I have made a package for this distributed computation daemon, that
> helps research on protein folding.
Well, that sounds interesting.
> The original tar file is huge (22MB) because it contains the (big)
> binaries for three ar
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:38:10PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> The original tar file is huge (22MB) because it contains the (big)
> binaries for three architectures (i386, powerpc and hppa).
But, the tarball comes with source, too, right? [Sorry -- too lazy and
on too low-bandwidth to look.]
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:38:10PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> The original tar file is huge (22MB) because it contains the (big)
> binaries for three architectures (i386, powerpc and hppa).
You should ask upstream kindly not to do this, and instead ship the binaries
in separate tarballs. Th
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:37, Matej Cepl wrote:
> What's so wrong with maintaing just one package?
It's like salted peanuts. Once you have one you can't stop. ;)
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive be
The software is binary-only ? In that case, it can never become a Debian
package itself, at most an installer.
As far as I know there is no source download at the moment. The license
is: http://www.distributedfolding.org/license.html
Redistribution is explicitely authorized if not-for-profit
I don't think this license satisifies the DFSG, but you're better off asking
debian-legal.
I don't think it does either. That's why I think the package would be
non-free.
Eh, no, that isn't quite how it works. Better check the Debian Policy
Manual:
"Packages must be placed in /non-free/ or
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:41:29PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> >The software is binary-only ? In that case, it can never become a Debian
> >package itself, at most an installer.
> As far as I know there is no source download at the moment. The license
> is: http://www.distributedfolding.org/l
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:37:59PM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Well, I really do not care about sexyness of my work. I have just
> participated in the development of the program (actually, it is
> just a script for vim), which seems to be very interesting for
> me (so I hoped it may be interesting f
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:41:29PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> As far as I know there is no source download at the moment. The license
> is: http://www.distributedfolding.org/license.html
> Redistribution is explicitely authorized if not-for-profit in the
> license, which makes it not free. C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:37:29PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:37, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > What's so wrong with maintaing just one package?
>
> It's like salted peanuts. Once you have one you can't stop. ;)
I second that emoti
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:41:29PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> Thomas Wouters wrote:
> >The software is binary-only ? In that case, it can never become a Debian
> >package itself, at most an installer.
>
> As far as I know there is no source download at the moment. The license
> is: http://www
Russell Coker wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:37, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > What's so wrong with maintaing just one package?
>
> It's like salted peanuts. Once you have one you can't stop. ;)
No, it is just other way around -- as if you couldn't get just
one peanut, but you would have to read at le
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 05:48:19PM -0500, Chad Miller wrote:
> Let me give a personal example: I wrote a program that uses the XMLRPC
> features of Advogato to edit one's diary there. People loved it. There
> are about two dozen people who regularly use it. I made it into a
> package, and put i
Hello,
I' d like to become a Debian maintainer. Meanwhile, I have packaged
Blassic :
http://www.arrakis.es/~ninsesabe/blassic/
a classic BASIC interpreter, and am looking for a sponsor.
You can get the .deb here :
http://www.chez.com/mathys/deb.html
Thanks
Antoine Mathys
hi
try using the 'printtool' package
(unfortunately the printer autoconfiguration is broken in Woody
- my fault- so you may wish to get the packages that are in unstable
or in http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/GNULpr
)
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 11:51:39AM -0600, Clare Jarvis wrote:
> Does anybody use th
I have managed, despite of my lack of time and my girlfriend ;) to
finish a beta version (?) of the OpenEXR packages.
Feel free to break them:
http://genarin.hispalinux.es/~data/
They are lintian clean, but linda reports an odd error.
I had a bit of troubles tracking down to bugs already repor
Hi,
John Tatum here, better known online as slidesinger. I am still
learning linux and in no way do I consider myself an expert, but I am
teachable, can read documentation, and have a great deal of non-linux
computer knowledge.
My programming experience is limited to System 360 mainframes w
Hi,
I have made a package for this distributed computation daemon, that
helps research on protein folding. I would be glad to get comments to
make it better. Would somebody be ready to sponsor me for applying as a
debian developer?
The original tar file is huge (22MB) because it contains th
Chad Miller wrote:
> Sure, all of these may not seem as "sexy" as uploading
> a package you create, but it sure helps Debian more.
Well, I really do not care about sexyness of my work. I have just
participated in the development of the program (actually, it is
just a script for vim), which seems t
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:38:10PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> The original tar file is huge (22MB) because it contains the (big)
> binaries for three architectures (i386, powerpc and hppa).
The software is binary-only ? In that case, it can never become a Debian
package itself, at most an in
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:38:10PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> The original tar file is huge (22MB) because it contains the (big)
> binaries for three architectures (i386, powerpc and hppa).
But, the tarball comes with source, too, right? [Sorry -- too lazy and
on too low-bandwidth to look.]
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:38:10PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> I have made a package for this distributed computation daemon, that
> helps research on protein folding.
Well, that sounds interesting.
> The original tar file is huge (22MB) because it contains the (big)
> binaries for three ar
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:38:10PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> The original tar file is huge (22MB) because it contains the (big)
> binaries for three architectures (i386, powerpc and hppa).
You should ask upstream kindly not to do this, and instead ship the binaries
in separate tarballs. Th
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:41:29PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> >The software is binary-only ? In that case, it can never become a Debian
> >package itself, at most an installer.
> As far as I know there is no source download at the moment. The license
> is: http://www.distributedfolding.org/l
The software is binary-only ? In that case, it can never become a Debian
package itself, at most an installer.
As far as I know there is no source download at the moment. The license
is: http://www.distributedfolding.org/license.html
Redistribution is explicitely authorized if not-for-profit
I don't think this license satisifies the DFSG, but you're better off asking
debian-legal.
I don't think it does either. That's why I think the package would be
non-free.
Eh, no, that isn't quite how it works. Better check the Debian Policy
Manual:
"Packages must be placed in /non-free/ or
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:37, Matej Cepl wrote:
> What's so wrong with maintaing just one package?
It's like salted peanuts. Once you have one you can't stop. ;)
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive be
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:37:59PM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Well, I really do not care about sexyness of my work. I have just
> participated in the development of the program (actually, it is
> just a script for vim), which seems to be very interesting for
> me (so I hoped it may be interesting f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:37:29PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:37, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > What's so wrong with maintaing just one package?
>
> It's like salted peanuts. Once you have one you can't stop. ;)
I second that emoti
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:41:29PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> As far as I know there is no source download at the moment. The license
> is: http://www.distributedfolding.org/license.html
> Redistribution is explicitely authorized if not-for-profit in the
> license, which makes it not free. C
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:41:29PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> Thomas Wouters wrote:
> >The software is binary-only ? In that case, it can never become a Debian
> >package itself, at most an installer.
>
> As far as I know there is no source download at the moment. The license
> is: http://www
Russell Coker wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:37, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > What's so wrong with maintaing just one package?
>
> It's like salted peanuts. Once you have one you can't stop. ;)
No, it is just other way around -- as if you couldn't get just
one peanut, but you would have to read at le
39 matches
Mail list logo
