Hello all,
Some time ago I filed the bug report indicating my intentions to
package jedit. This deb and its releases since the bug report have been
hosted at www.jedit.org via sourceforge. I decided to host them at
sourceforge to allow me to have time to reread the debian.org/devel/
docs a few m
Hello again,
I have a general question, that I did find a answer for in the debian
policy guide (don't falme me if I missed it :(( )
Nicolas gave me the advice to exclude all processor optimisations in the
nvrec package, so I added the configure flags
--enable-mmxcheck
--enable-cpucheck
that are
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 10:29:14AM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> I have a general question, that I did find a answer for in the debian
> policy guide (don't falme me if I missed it :(( )
>
> Nicolas gave me the advice to exclude all processor optimisations in the
> nvrec package, so I added the conf
I am responsible for wmget package. Why Bug #150003 has'nt been forward
to me ?
--
Rafa? "Bluszcz" Zawadzki Linux registered user #232814
GSM: +48 600 610 162 | mail: bluszcz(at)ats.com.pl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
> What about autobuilders, or anyone who might have to do a non-maintainer
> upload of the package at some point in the future?
Autobuilders will have a package that is tailored to their system
(optimised, hence running faster).
Somebody that does a non-maintainer build (not me), will have to che
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 12:55:25PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > What about autobuilders, or anyone who might have to do a non-maintainer
> > upload of the package at some point in the future?
>
> Autobuilders will have a package that is tailored to their system
> (optimised,
* Rafal Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-17 12:45]:
> I am responsible for wmget package. Why Bug #150003 has'nt been
> forward to me ?
The package was new and the BTS didn't know about it at the time the
bug was filed.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 01:25:22PM -0400, Ari Pollak wrote:
> The standard way of storing the root password for MySQL is in
> ~root/.my.cnf.. It should look something like this:
> [mysqladmin]
> user= username
> password= password
> In any case, I don't think it wise to add/r
Ari Pollak wrote:
In any case, I don't think it wise to add/remove databases on
installation/removal, that should probably be left up to the user to do
- I don't think any package, including TWIG, which needs MySQL to run,
installs a database automatically.
I believe that IMP does some questi
Duncan Findlay wrote:
> However, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is no longer a valid e-mail address. Should I
> delete the uid, even though it is the only signed uid, or should I
> leave it, even though the e-mail is not valid?
Deleting uids IIRC is *not* possible, it can be that it reappears
through the synch
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 07:21:39PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Deleting uids IIRC is *not* possible, it can be that it reappears
> through the synching of the keyservers.
I *think* it's possible to generate a revocation certificate, though,
for just one UID. I'm not entirely sure, though.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 17 June 2002 19:02, Bill Jonas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 07:21:39PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Deleting uids IIRC is *not* possible, it can be that it reappears
> > through the synching of the keyservers.
>
> I *think* it's possi
Hi all,
I'm about to package a little soft.. Which distribution should I make this
package for ? unstable ?
++
--
* Eric GENTILINI
* 4th year student in Software Engineering*
* Ecole des Mines de Nantes - http://www.emn.fr *
***
Em Mon, 17 Jun 2002 22:51:42 +0200, Eric Gentilini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm about to package a little soft.. Which distribution should I make this
> package for ? unstable ?
Yes.. if you are planning to make an official package, yes. Of course
you can build your package fo
Paul Cupis wrote:
> Present a menu which enables you to do all key
> related tasks:
>
> revsigRevoke a signature. GnuPG asks for
>every signature which has been done by
>one of the
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 12:07:56AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Paul Cupis wrote:
> > Present a menu which enables you to do all key
> > related tasks:
> >
> > revsigRevoke a signature. GnuPG asks for
> >eve
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 12:07:56AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Paul Cupis wrote:
> > Present a menu which enables you to do all key
> > related tasks:
> >
> > revsigRevoke a signature. GnuPG asks for
> >eve
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 12:07:56AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Paul Cupis wrote:
> > So it looks like you can generate a revokation certificate for a particular
> > signature.
> ^
>
> Yes, you can revoke a _signature_. But that was not the question. He
> wanted to remove one of his _
Dear Sir,
We here by apply for an application for sponsorship
under your organization.
We are a club in the univesity of lagos call ANTIAIDS CLUB.
WE are planning o attend the up coming AIDS program in spain next mouth.
Sir we are pleading for your so that we could go to this program, as the first
Hi Stephen!
On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Stephen Stafford wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 12:07:56AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Paul Cupis wrote:
> > > Present a menu which enables you to do all key
> > > related tasks:
> > >
> > > revsigRe
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 10:53:19PM -0400, B. L. Jilek wrote:
> Hi Stephen!
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Stephen Stafford wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 12:07:56AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Paul Cupis wrote:
> > > > Present a menu which enables you to do all key
> > > >
21 matches
Mail list logo
