*****SPAM***** °ú¼Ó½ºÆ¼Ä¿ °ÆÁ¤¾ø´Ù.[±¤°í]

2002-06-12 Thread ¿£½ºÅ¸
p, font, span { line-height:120%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; } º» ¸ÞÀÏ ¼ö½ÅÀ» ¿øÄ¡¾ÊÀ¸½Ã¸é mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ´­·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä http://active.macromedia.com/flash4/cabs/swflash.cab#version=4,0,0,0 height=300 style="HEIGHT: 270px; WIDTH: 588px" width=650>http://ho1534.netia

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-12 Thread Marc Leeman
> As far as I know, lame is not in Debian, and can't be because of a > patent... :-( > So I guess nvrec will at best belong to contrib. Were you aware of this > issue? I know that lame and all related mp3 encoders were not in debian because of this problem, but it completely slipped my mind when

RFS for gnewtellium

2002-06-12 Thread Matthew M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm doing a package for gnewtellium (http://gnewtellium.sourceforge.net) and I'm looking for somone who wants to sponsor it. Source and binary packages are at http://www.btinternet.com/~matthew.macleod/debian Lintian didn't complain, except for po

*****SPAM***** CIBLEZ ET DEMARCHEZ GRATUITEMENT VOS PROSPECTS PAR CENTAINES DE MILLIERS

2002-06-12 Thread VOTRE SITE ...
CIBLEZ ET DEMARCHEZ GRATUITEMENT VOS PROSPECTS PAR CENTAINE DE MILLIERS GRACE AU ROBOT MAIL - 5000 fois

lintian and statically link binaries

2002-06-12 Thread Oliver Kurth
Hello! I want to package cpuburn, this is a small collection of assembler prgrams to test CPUs (x86 only). lintian gives me these errors: oku@robin:~/debian/cpuburn-1.4$ lintian ../cpuburn_1.4-1_i386.deb E: cpuburn: statically-linked-binary ./usr/sbin/burnBX E: cpuburn: statically-linked-binary

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:56:46AM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote: > > > As far as I know, lame is not in Debian, and can't be because of a > > patent... :-( > > So I guess nvrec will at best belong to contrib. Were you aware of this > > issue? > > I know that lame and all related mp3 encoders were no

Re: lintian and statically link binaries

2002-06-12 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 01:16:33PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote: > I want to package cpuburn, this is a small collection of assembler > prgrams to test CPUs (x86 only). lintian gives me these errors: > > oku@robin:~/debian/cpuburn-1.4$ lintian ../cpuburn_1.4-1_i386.deb > E: cpuburn: statically-linke

Re: lintian and statically link binaries

2002-06-12 Thread Oliver Kurth
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:10:15PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 01:16:33PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote: > > I want to package cpuburn, this is a small collection of assembler > > prgrams to test CPUs (x86 only). lintian gives me these errors: > > > > oku@robin:~/debian/cpubur

Re: lintian and statically link binaries

2002-06-12 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Josip Rodin wrote: > > This statically linked is hardly a problem: > > -rwxr-xr-x1 oku oku 612 Jun 12 12:38 burnBX > > > > Can I just ignore this and write a file to /usr/share/lintian/overrides/ ? > > Do you have a reason to link them statically instead

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-12 Thread Marc Leeman
> Why don't you suggest upstream to use libogg instead/too? I do not think that ogg is supported in common video compressed formats. I guess it's just a matter of comply with "standards". I am not aware of video (trans)coders that use ogg for audio compression (yet). -- greetz, marc

Re: lintian and statically link binaries

2002-06-12 Thread Joey Hess
Oliver Kurth wrote: > Hello! > > I want to package cpuburn, this is a small collection of assembler > prgrams to test CPUs (x86 only). lintian gives me these errors: > > oku@robin:~/debian/cpuburn-1.4$ lintian ../cpuburn_1.4-1_i386.deb > E: cpuburn: statically-linked-binary ./usr/sbin/burnBX I

Falls du Kinder hast - wichtig! Gegen Gewalt am Computer!

2002-06-12 Thread xcd4u
Hi du! Hab noch irgendwo am Computer deine Mailadresse gefunden. Will dir auch nicht weiter deine Zeit stehlen - wollte dich nur auf eine, wie ich finde, wichtige Initiative aufmerksam machen: http://www.netkids.info - gegen Gewalt im Internet Kostet nichts - außer ein bißchen Zeit - hilft

*****SPAM***** °ú¼Ó½ºÆ¼Ä¿ °ÆÁ¤¾ø´Ù.[±¤°í]

2002-06-12 Thread ¿£½ºÅ¸
p, font, span { line-height:120%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; } º» ¸ÞÀÏ ¼ö½ÅÀ» ¿øÄ¡¾ÊÀ¸½Ã¸é mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ´­·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä http://active.macromedia.com/flash4/cabs/swflash.cab#version=4,0,0,0 height=300 style="HEIGHT: 270px; W

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-12 Thread Marc Leeman
> As far as I know, lame is not in Debian, and can't be because of a > patent... :-( > So I guess nvrec will at best belong to contrib. Were you aware of this > issue? I know that lame and all related mp3 encoders were not in debian because of this problem, but it completely slipped my mind when

RFS for gnewtellium

2002-06-12 Thread Matthew M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm doing a package for gnewtellium (http://gnewtellium.sourceforge.net) and I'm looking for somone who wants to sponsor it. Source and binary packages are at http://www.btinternet.com/~matthew.macleod/debian Lintian didn't complain, except for poi

*****SPAM***** CIBLEZ ET DEMARCHEZ GRATUITEMENT VOS PROSPECTS PAR CENTAINES DE MILLIERS

2002-06-12 Thread VOTRE SITE ...
CIBLEZ ET DEMARCHEZ GRATUITEMENT VOS PROSPECTS PAR CENTAINE DE MILLIERS GRACE AU ROBOT MAIL - 5000 fois

lintian and statically link binaries

2002-06-12 Thread Oliver Kurth
Hello! I want to package cpuburn, this is a small collection of assembler prgrams to test CPUs (x86 only). lintian gives me these errors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/cpuburn-1.4$ lintian ../cpuburn_1.4-1_i386.deb E: cpuburn: statically-linked-binary ./usr/sbin/burnBX E: cpuburn: statically-linked-

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:56:46AM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote: > > > As far as I know, lame is not in Debian, and can't be because of a > > patent... :-( > > So I guess nvrec will at best belong to contrib. Were you aware of this > > issue? > > I know that lame and all related mp3 encoders were not

Re: lintian and statically link binaries

2002-06-12 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 01:16:33PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote: > I want to package cpuburn, this is a small collection of assembler > prgrams to test CPUs (x86 only). lintian gives me these errors: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/cpuburn-1.4$ lintian ../cpuburn_1.4-1_i386.deb > E: cpuburn: staticall

Re: lintian and statically link binaries

2002-06-12 Thread Oliver Kurth
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:10:15PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 01:16:33PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote: > > I want to package cpuburn, this is a small collection of assembler > > prgrams to test CPUs (x86 only). lintian gives me these errors: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian

Re: lintian and statically link binaries

2002-06-12 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Josip Rodin wrote: > > This statically linked is hardly a problem: > > -rwxr-xr-x1 oku oku 612 Jun 12 12:38 burnBX > > > > Can I just ignore this and write a file to /usr/share/lintian/overrides/ ? > > Do you have a reason to link them statically instead o

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-12 Thread Marc Leeman
> Why don't you suggest upstream to use libogg instead/too? I do not think that ogg is supported in common video compressed formats. I guess it's just a matter of comply with "standards". I am not aware of video (trans)coders that use ogg for audio compression (yet). -- greetz, marc

Re: lintian and statically link binaries

2002-06-12 Thread Joey Hess
Oliver Kurth wrote: > Hello! > > I want to package cpuburn, this is a small collection of assembler > prgrams to test CPUs (x86 only). lintian gives me these errors: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/cpuburn-1.4$ lintian ../cpuburn_1.4-1_i386.deb > E: cpuburn: statically-linked-binary ./usr/sbin/bur

Falls du Kinder hast - wichtig! Gegen Gewalt am Computer!

2002-06-12 Thread xcd4u
Hi du! Hab noch irgendwo am Computer deine Mailadresse gefunden. Will dir auch nicht weiter deine Zeit stehlen - wollte dich nur auf eine, wie ich finde, wichtige Initiative aufmerksam machen: http://www.netkids.info - gegen Gewalt im Internet Kostet nichts - außer ein bißchen Zeit - hilft a