On Sunday 28 October 2007 07:10:57 pm Paul Wise wrote:
> On 10/29/07, The Fungi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would consider its popularity low (187 popcon installs with 46
> > votes).
>
> I consider such fringe packages to be the main benefit of using
> Debian. That is; it is the diversity (or
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 07:44:28AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
> I think you have misinterpreted my position. Sponsoring is an
> introduction to NM and whether or not the maintainer is looking to join
> NM has no effect on the quality of packages at the start of sponsoring.
[...]
> The "probl
Neil Williams wrote:
> > I would consider its popularity low (187 popcon installs with 46
> > votes).
>
> It's not that low. It looks like quite a few people find it useful, so
> that's good.
Using absolute popcon numbers as indications of a package's popularity
isn't the best idea anyway, since
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:47:42 +
The Fungi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:19:12PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> [...]
> > What kind of popcon score? i.e. does anyone else think it is a useful
> > addition?
>
> I would consider its popularity low (187 popcon installs wit
On 10/29/07, The Fungi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would consider its popularity low (187 popcon installs with 46
> votes).
I consider such fringe packages to be the main benefit of using
Debian. That is; it is the diversity (or universality) of Debian that
is attractive and useful.
--
bye,
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:19:12PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
> What kind of popcon score? i.e. does anyone else think it is a useful
> addition?
I would consider its popularity low (187 popcon installs with 46
votes). Admittedly, Russ sponsored it because he said thought he was
likely to f
6 matches
Mail list logo
