Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-21 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Steve" == Steve M Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> Despite your prejudice, there is no policy forbidding hard links in a Steve> .deb file. There is a caveat: hardlinks do not work across partitions, and one is generally not aware of the partition schema on the target mach

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-21 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Steve" == Steve M Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> Despite your prejudice, there is no policy forbidding hard links in a Steve> .deb file. There is a caveat: hardlinks do not work across partitions, and one is generally not aware of the partition schema on the target mac

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-18 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 16-Apr-2001 Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 01:21:45PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: >> > >> > To mistake a hard link for a zero-length file is sloppy coding. >> > This is a bug in lintian. >> > >> >> lintian gets its information from tar's output. A hardlink is shown as

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-18 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 16-Apr-2001 Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 01:21:45PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: >> > >> > To mistake a hard link for a zero-length file is sloppy coding. >> > This is a bug in lintian. >> > >> >> lintian gets its information from tar's output. A hardlink is shown as

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-17 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 01:21:45PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > > To mistake a hard link for a zero-length file is sloppy coding. > > This is a bug in lintian. > > > > lintian gets its information from tar's output. A hardlink is shown as a zero > byte file. So lintian does somethin

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-17 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 01:21:45PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > > To mistake a hard link for a zero-length file is sloppy coding. > > This is a bug in lintian. > > > > lintian gets its information from tar's output. A hardlink is shown as a zero > byte file. So lintian does somethi

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-16 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 01:21:45PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > > To mistake a hard link for a zero-length file is sloppy coding. > > This is a bug in lintian. > > > > lintian gets its information from tar's output. A hardlink is shown as a zero > byte file. > > Before you accuse sl

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-16 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > To mistake a hard link for a zero-length file is sloppy coding. > This is a bug in lintian. > lintian gets its information from tar's output. A hardlink is shown as a zero byte file. Before you accuse sloppy coding you had better have a better way to do it and a patch.

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-16 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 10:30:45AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > On 16-Apr-2001 Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 09:59:50PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > >> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:06:02PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > >> > > > And note that hard links are forbid

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-16 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 01:21:45PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > > To mistake a hard link for a zero-length file is sloppy coding. > > This is a bug in lintian. > > > > lintian gets its information from tar's output. A hardlink is shown as a zero > byte file. > > Before you accuse s

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-16 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" | However, as I stated in my reply when this came up on lintian -- | hard links are BAD. Symlinks were invented for a reason. I believe you mean something like 'multiple hard links to the same file are bad'. A single hard link is _very_ useful, imho. ;-) And multiple

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-16 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 16-Apr-2001 Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 09:59:50PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: >> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:06:02PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: >> > > > And note that hard links are forbidden by policy. >> > > >> >> It is true that section 5.6 forbids hard links in

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-16 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > To mistake a hard link for a zero-length file is sloppy coding. > This is a bug in lintian. > lintian gets its information from tar's output. A hardlink is shown as a zero byte file. Before you accuse sloppy coding you had better have a better way to do it and a patch. -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-16 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 10:30:45AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > On 16-Apr-2001 Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 09:59:50PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > >> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:06:02PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > >> > > > And note that hard links are forbi

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-16 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" | However, as I stated in my reply when this came up on lintian -- | hard links are BAD. Symlinks were invented for a reason. I believe you mean something like 'multiple hard links to the same file are bad'. A single hard link is _very_ useful, imho. ;-) And multiple

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-16 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 16-Apr-2001 Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 09:59:50PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: >> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:06:02PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: >> > > > And note that hard links are forbidden by policy. >> > > >> >> It is true that section 5.6 forbids hard links i

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 09:59:50PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:06:02PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > > And note that hard links are forbidden by policy. > > > > > It is true that section 5.6 forbids hard links in a _source_ package, > but recall that we ar

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 09:59:50PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:06:02PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > > And note that hard links are forbidden by policy. > > > > > It is true that section 5.6 forbids hard links in a _source_ package, > but recall that we a

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-15 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 02:17:44AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:06:02PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > And note that hard links are forbidden by policy. > > > > Ah! I looked for that bit of policy a few months ago, and couldn't find it. > > Where did you find it?

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-15 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:06:02PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > And note that hard links are forbidden by policy. > > Ah! I looked for that bit of policy a few months ago, and couldn't find it. > Where did you find it? Searched for the word "hard" in /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.tex

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-15 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 09:37:49PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:09:51PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > W: ktouch: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory > > > usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ktouch/.anchors > > > N: > > > N: package contains a file which is empty > > > N: >

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-15 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 02:17:44AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:06:02PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > And note that hard links are forbidden by policy. > > > > Ah! I looked for that bit of policy a few months ago, and couldn't find it. > > Where did you find it

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-15 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:06:02PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > And note that hard links are forbidden by policy. > > Ah! I looked for that bit of policy a few months ago, and couldn't find it. > Where did you find it? Searched for the word "hard" in /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.te

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-15 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:09:51PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > W: ktouch: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory > > usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ktouch/.anchors > > N: > > N: package contains a file which is empty > > N: > > Well, this ought to be obvious: is the file empty? :-) > > Actually, t

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-15 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 09:37:49PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:09:51PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > W: ktouch: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory > > > usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ktouch/.anchors > > > N: > > > N: package contains a file which is empty > > > N: >

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-15 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:09:51PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > W: ktouch: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory > > usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ktouch/.anchors > > N: > > N: package contains a file which is empty > > N: > > Well, this ought to be obvious: is the file empty? :-) > > Actually,

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-13 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:18:43PM +0200, Christian SPENER wrote: > > > > this are my last errors, don't know how to fix them > also the programmer of the program doesn't know how to fix them, so someone > can giveme some hints, where the problem could be? [...] > W: ktouch: zero-byte-file-

Re: lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-13 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:18:43PM +0200, Christian SPENER wrote: > > > > this are my last errors, don't know how to fix them > also the programmer of the program doesn't know how to fix them, so someone > can giveme some hints, where the problem could be? [...] > W: ktouch: zero-byte-file

lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-13 Thread Christian SPENER
this are my last errors, don't know how to fix them also the programmer of the program doesn't know how to fix them, so someone can giveme some hints, where the problem could be? thx chris # lintian -i ktouch_1.0-8_i386.changes warning: lintian's authors do not recommend running it with ro

lintian -i file.changes error

2001-04-13 Thread Christian SPENER
this are my last errors, don't know how to fix them also the programmer of the program doesn't know how to fix them, so someone can giveme some hints, where the problem could be? thx chris # lintian -i ktouch_1.0-8_i386.changes warning: lintian's authors do not recommend running it with r