Duncan Findlay wrote:
>
> The NM process is full of waiting. Consider it more of a test of
> devotion rather than a nuisance. It'll happen eventually, I believe
> most of this stuff has to be done manually, and usually by some of the
> busiest people Debian has.
>
> --
> Duncan Findlay, who had
Duncan Findlay wrote:
>
> The NM process is full of waiting. Consider it more of a test of
> devotion rather than a nuisance. It'll happen eventually, I believe
> most of this stuff has to be done manually, and usually by some of the
> busiest people Debian has.
>
> --
> Duncan Findlay, who had
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 05:05:25PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > > > I waited 6 weeks before AM assigned. (I had advocate when applied.)
> > > > My AM does not yet contact me f
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > > I waited 6 weeks before AM assigned. (I had advocate when applied.)
> > > My AM does not yet contact me few days while I see his posting on ML.
I am trying to get a time window to process a
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
> and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
> but I
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > I waited 6 weeks before AM assigned. (I had advocate when applied.)
> > My AM does not yet contact me few days while I see his posting on ML.
> > But right after I moved to cue with AM, many people got AM. Somewhat
> > random.
> > Y
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > > I waited 6 weeks before AM assigned. (I had advocate when applied.)
> > > My AM does not yet contact me few days while I see his posting on ML.
I am trying to get a time window to process
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
> and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
> but I
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> > I waited 6 weeks before AM assigned. (I had advocate when applied.)
> > My AM does not yet contact me few days while I see his posting on ML.
> > But right after I moved to cue with AM, many people got AM. Somewhat
> > random.
> >
> I waited 6 weeks before AM assigned. (I had advocate when applied.)
> My AM does not yet contact me few days while I see his posting on ML.
> But right after I moved to cue with AM, many people got AM. Somewhat
> random.
> You can see this nm.debin.org/nmlist.php.
> People are busy now due to m
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
> and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
> but I
> I waited 6 weeks before AM assigned. (I had advocate when applied.)
> My AM does not yet contact me few days while I see his posting on ML.
> But right after I moved to cue with AM, many people got AM. Somewhat
> random.
> You can see this nm.debin.org/nmlist.php.
> People are busy now due to
Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
Wait another 2 - 3 weeks.
Go and read all at nm.debian.org, including the templates for the AM.
Prepare you for
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
> and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
> but I
Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
Wait another 2 - 3 weeks.
Go and read all at nm.debian.org, including the templates for the AM.
Prepare you fo
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
^^
> Hello,
>
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
^^^
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
> and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
> but I just want to
Hello,
I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
but I just want to ask how long you have to wait normally at the moment.
My advo
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
^^
> Hello,
>
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
^^^
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
> advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
> and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
> but I just want t
Hello,
I started my NM-process at the 5. July 2002, and it was checked by my
advocate at the 10. July 2002. Now 25 days (more than 3 weeks) passed,
and still no AM contacted me. I know that the NM-team has a hard job,
but I just want to ask how long you have to wait normally at the moment.
My adv
21 matches
Mail list logo
