Re: faqomatic bug handling question

2003-01-31 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:25:50PM -0500, jereme wrote: > Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > > this question suggests me that faqomatic (reporter version, not in debian) > > doesn't depend on libcgi-pm-perl > > The faqomatic package IN debian does not specify libcgi-pm-perl as a > dependency though it def

Re: faqomatic bug handling question

2003-01-31 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:25:50PM -0500, jereme wrote: > Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > > this question suggests me that faqomatic (reporter version, not in debian) > > doesn't depend on libcgi-pm-perl > > The faqomatic package IN debian does not specify libcgi-pm-perl as a > dependency though it def

Re: faqomatic bug handling question

2003-01-30 Thread jereme
[snips:] Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > >How can this be? Could the reporter have been using a non-debian > >package? Current upstream is 2.717. > sure, for example by using unofficial repository or by building the > package using debian/ directory sometimes bundled with upstream > source (e

Re: faqomatic bug handling question

2003-01-30 Thread jereme
[snips:] Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > >How can this be? Could the reporter have been using a non-debian > >package? Current upstream is 2.717. > sure, for example by using unofficial repository or by building the > package using debian/ directory sometimes bundled with upstream > source (e

Re: faqomatic bug handling question

2003-01-30 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:46:19PM -0500, jereme wrote: > Hi all, > > >I am working on fixing my first bug in the package faqomatic, which >I would like to adopt. I have a few "how should this be handled" >questions. > >The bug is #177890 and it basically reports that faqomatic,

Re: faqomatic bug handling question

2003-01-30 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:46:19PM -0500, jereme wrote: > Hi all, > > >I am working on fixing my first bug in the package faqomatic, which >I would like to adopt. I have a few "how should this be handled" >questions. > >The bug is #177890 and it basically reports that faqomatic,

faqomatic bug handling question

2003-01-29 Thread jereme
Hi all, I am working on fixing my first bug in the package faqomatic, which I would like to adopt. I have a few "how should this be handled" questions. The bug is #177890 and it basically reports that faqomatic, (a web based program for maintaining faq's) produces invalid HTML ou

faqomatic bug handling question

2003-01-29 Thread jereme
Hi all, I am working on fixing my first bug in the package faqomatic, which I would like to adopt. I have a few "how should this be handled" questions. The bug is #177890 and it basically reports that faqomatic, (a web based program for maintaining faq's) produces invalid HTML ou