cme update dpkg-copyright
Please see for detailed information:
https://github.com/dod38fr/config-model/wiki/Updating-debian-copyright-file-with-cme
Other tools are listed in this page:
https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools
HTH
On Friday, 19 April 2019 00:04:03 CEST Tong Sun wrote:
> What is the simplest way to put all contributors into the Debian copyright
> file?
Please don't. Contributors are not necessarily copyright owners.
Debian policy [1] requires:
> Every package must be accompanied by a verbat
ong Sun wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What is the simplest way to put all contributors into the Debian copyright
> > file?
> >
> > I know the hardest way is associate each with their corresponding
> > change files, but for popular projects, the Debian copyri
Hi,
The simplest way is to modify automatically generated copyright file:
$ licensecheck -r --deb-machine . >> debian/copyright
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 06:04:03PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the simplest way to put all contributors into the Debian copyright
>
Hi,
What is the simplest way to put all contributors into the Debian copyright file?
I know the hardest way is associate each with their corresponding
change files, but for popular projects, the Debian copyright file
would be unnecessarily HUGE.
Would this be acceptable? Especially for those
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 10:06:58AM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently working on this bug [1], the package has a licensed font
> with this text [2]. Can you tell me how I define this license in
> debian/copyright file?
>
> Please add CC to me, I'm
> reorganizes and groups everything, and writes a machine-readable
> > debian/copyright file?
>
> Is this what you are looking for?
>
> $ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5 >
> debian/copyright
Mmmmh, interesting... I'll give it a try
,
>> reorganizes and groups everything, and writes a machine-readable
>> debian/copyright file?
>
> Is this what you are looking for?
>
> $ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5 >
> debian/copyright
>
> You definitely still need to ma
> debian/copyright file?
Is this what you are looking for?
$ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5 >
debian/copyright
You definitely still need to manually check the copyright file
afterwards for any errors, of course.
Regards,
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Hi everybody,
I began to study the machine-readable debian/copyright file format [1],
with the plan to adopt it for my (current and future) packages.
[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
I have a question, though.
I can write a debian/copyright file by hand for
Bart Martens writes:
> I'm personally not a fan of DEP5, because I have not yet seen any
> benefits,
I wrote git-copyright-scan to be able to automatically update the list
of copyright holders from git:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2011/04/msg7.html
I couldn't imagine doing this m
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 06:42:19 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> I'm personally not a fan of DEP5, because I have not yet seen any benefits,
> only more work for the packager, and less readable for humans than plain text.
Side remark: I personally find a structured Copyright-Format 1.0 file
much easier
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, gustavo panizzo
> wrote:
> >
> > cd /usr/share/doc
> > find . -name copyright |xargs grep
> > 'http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/'
Le Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:35:03AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka a écrit :
> >
> Sorry, but not helpful.
Aliaksei Sheshka writes:
> I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package
> to use as a reference, which makes packaging for beginner even
> harder.
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/r/remctl/current/copyright
includes all of the Autoconf-based build system
Ben Finney writes:
> Aliaksei Sheshka writes:
>> 2) Which license do have auto generated files, like 'configure',
>> 'Makefile', *am', etc ?
> If there is no human creativity in the generation of the files, then my
> understanding of international copyright law is that such files are not
> subj
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Monday 16 July 2012 14:59:51 Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
>> I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package to
>> use as a reference, which makes packaging for beginner even harder.
>
> Here's one that was not trivi
On Monday 16 July 2012 14:59:51 Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package to
> use as a reference, which makes packaging for beginner even harder.
Here's one that was not trivial to write:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/pa
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:35:03AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, gustavo panizzo
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> >
> > > I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package
> > to
> > > use
On 2012-07-16 10:35:03 -0400 (-0400), Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> Sorry, but not helpful. They only represent ~13% on nearly default
> Wheezy setup
[...]
While still not a perfect example, my weather-util package has
ISC-licensed and public domain components...
http://packages.debian.org/change
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
>
> > I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package
> to
> > use as a reference,
> cd /usr/share/doc
> find . -name copyright |xargs grep
> 'http:/
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package to
> use as a reference,
cd /usr/share/doc
find . -name copyright |xargs grep
'http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/'
--
1AE0 3
Aliaksei Sheshka writes:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> > The grant needs to be explicit, written, specifying exactly what
> > work is being licensed, in a statement from the copyright holder.
> > Ideally of the form:
> >
> > This is , consisting of . You may
> >
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Aliaksei Sheshka writes:
>
> > 1) should a package 'inherit' license from the original COPYING file if
> > not stated otherwise ?
>
> I don't know how to understand that sentence.
>
> If you are asking whether the mere presence of a ‘COPYING’
On Monday 16 July 2012 04:00:17 Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> You still have to look through your debian/copyright file manually to
> check for any mistakes or inconsistencies, but at the very least, the
> syntax would be correct. There's also a DEP-5 parser that you can use
> to
Aliaksei Sheshka writes:
> 1) should a package 'inherit' license from the original COPYING file if
> not stated otherwise ?
I don't know how to understand that sentence.
If you are asking whether the mere presence of a ‘COPYING’ file, but no
explicit license grant, applies to files in the pack
W: irrtoolset source: syntax-error-in-dep5-copyright line 1201:
> Continuation line outside a paragraph.
This probably indicates you have an indented line (leading whitespace on
the line) where it's not expected. It's good that you discovered this
now so you can learn how to fix it b
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 06:00:59PM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:51:46AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> > > I've read the policy but still confused, if some one can help, please
> > > take a look.
> >
> > Do y
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Vincent Cheng writes:
>
> > $ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5 >
> > debian/copyright
> >
> > You still have to look through your debian/copyright file manually to
> > ch
Vincent Cheng writes:
> $ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5 >
> debian/copyright
>
> You still have to look through your debian/copyright file manually to
> check for any mistakes or inconsistencies, but at the very least, the
> syntax would
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Aliaksei Sheshka
> wrote:
> > Hi Debian-Mentors!
> >
> > Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
>
> $ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdb
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> Hi Debian-Mentors!
>
> Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
$ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5 >
debian/copyright
You still have to look through your debian/co
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:51:46AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> > Hi Debian-Mentors!
> >
> > Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
>
> No idea.
>
> > I'm trying t
Hi,
On 15/07/12 20:08, Daniel Martí wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 06:04:25PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:51:46AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
Hi Debian-Mentors!
Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
No idea.
Probably not. As far as
* Daniel Martí [120715 20:17]:
> > > Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
> >
> > No idea.
>
> Probably not. As far as I have seen the debian/copyright file is
> carefully made, since not only the licenses must be listed but the
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 06:04:25PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:51:46AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> > Hi Debian-Mentors!
> >
> > Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
>
> No idea.
Probably not. As fa
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:51:46AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> Hi Debian-Mentors!
>
> Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
No idea.
> I'm trying to build a package for irrtoolset
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3923
Hi Debian-Mentors!
Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ?
I'm trying to build a package for irrtoolset
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=392333
but the source code has multiple licenses, one file licence a, another b
and so on.
I've told that
Le Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 01:09:21AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka a écrit :
> Hi debian-devel list!
>
> Please help me to write a proper `debian/copyright` file.
> Original COPYING file says:
>
> Several parties hold copyright to various parts of IRRToolSet. One or more
> of the f
Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are a couple of files that do NOT have copyright, these were
> created by a US government contractor and therefor :-
>
> Copyright: It is the policy of NLM (U.S. National Library of Medicine)
>(and U.S. government) to not assert copyrigh
Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are a couple of files that do NOT have copyright, these were
> created by a US government contractor and therefor :-
>
> Copyright: It is the policy of NLM (U.S. National Library of Medicine)
>(and U.S. government) to not assert copyright
files be listed separately with its own list of copyright
> holders? To me this seems the *correct* way to do things and each file
> that does not fall under the Files: * catch all list should have its own
> entry in the debian/copyright file. Or can i just add the extra
> contribut
Dear mentors,
I wanted to ask about the debian/copyright file, I am currently working
on a package (openjpeg a jpeg2000 library) that has a long and
complicated copyright history. What i mean by that is there have been
many contributors over the years and therefor very few files have
42 matches
Mail list logo
