Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> yes, i read -mentors.
OK, so only followup to -mentors ;-)
>> About it, Why does your package is called 'jbofh-swing' and upstream
>> is called 'cerebrum'.
>
> because of the non-free dependecies i do not build the java
> client (with swing gui)
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> yes, i read -mentors.
OK, so only followup to -mentors ;-)
>> About it, Why does your package is called 'jbofh-swing' and upstream
>> is called 'cerebrum'.
>
> because of the non-free dependecies i do not build the java
> client (with swing gui)
* Arnaud Vandyck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040307 23:34]:
> [Andrea, I don't know if your read -mentors so I'cc:ing you. I do so you
> can only use the Mail-Followup-To header]
yes, i read -mentors.
> Only with a java point-of-view, your package seems great, you
> debian/rules file is good (well, cdbs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[Andrea, I don't know if your read -mentors so I'cc:ing you. I do so you
can only use the Mail-Followup-To header]
Only with a java point-of-view, your package seems great, you
debian/rules file is good (well, cdbs rocks!). But I have some general
com
* Arnaud Vandyck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040307 23:34]:
> [Andrea, I don't know if your read -mentors so I'cc:ing you. I do so you
> can only use the Mail-Followup-To header]
yes, i read -mentors.
> Only with a java point-of-view, your package seems great, you
> debian/rules file is good (well, cdbs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[Andrea, I don't know if your read -mentors so I'cc:ing you. I do so you
can only use the Mail-Followup-To header]
Only with a java point-of-view, your package seems great, you
debian/rules file is good (well, cdbs rocks!). But I have some general
com
* Arnaud Vandyck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040307 19:32]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:37:26 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > posted to debian-mentors:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/bugs/jbofh-swing$ dpkg-source -x
> > jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306-1.dsc
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:37:26 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> posted to debian-mentors:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/bugs/jbofh-swing$ dpkg-source -x
> jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306-1.dsc
> > dpkg-source: error:
* Arnaud Vandyck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040307 19:32]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:37:26 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > posted to debian-mentors:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/bugs/jbofh-swing$ dpkg-source -x
> > jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306-1.dsc
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:37:26 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> posted to debian-mentors:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/bugs/jbofh-swing$ dpkg-source -x
> jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306-1.dsc
> > dpkg-source: error:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:37:26 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted to debian-mentors:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/bugs/jbofh-swing$ dpkg-source -x
> jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306-1.dsc
> dpkg-source: error: file jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306.orig.tar.gz has size
> 757760 instead of expected
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i am not sure if i understand the java policy correctly and if
> the result is as intended. I attribute that to my missing
> knowledge of java terminology.
>
> if people (the developers of the software) r
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:37:26 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted to debian-mentors:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/bugs/jbofh-swing$ dpkg-source -x
> jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306-1.dsc
> dpkg-source: error: file jbofh-swing_0.0.20040306.orig.tar.gz has size 757760
> instead of expected
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i am not sure if i understand the java policy correctly and if
> the result is as intended. I attribute that to my missing
> knowledge of java terminology.
>
> if people (the developers of the software) r
i am not sure if i understand the java policy correctly and if
the result is as intended. I attribute that to my missing
knowledge of java terminology.
if people (the developers of the software) run this with
java -jar JBofh.jar
does that make this a java program or is it still some sort of
libr
i am not sure if i understand the java policy correctly and if
the result is as intended. I attribute that to my missing
knowledge of java terminology.
if people (the developers of the software) run this with
java -jar JBofh.jar
does that make this a java program or is it still some sort of
libr
16 matches
Mail list logo
