Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > PS: carefull with File://, apt-get source will create links into the
> > mirror and debuild will then erase the files from the repository and
> > replace them when you rebuild.
> >
> I guess I don't follow the warnings en
Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > PS: carefull with File://, apt-get source will create links into the
> > mirror and debuild will then erase the files from the repository and
> > replace them when you rebuild.
> >
> I guess I don't follow the warnings en
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:33:44PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> I thought looking at the man page of debuild would help, as I'm not
> familiar with debuild. But I didn't see a debian package in the
> repository called debuild. Perhaps it is spelled incorrectly? Or maybe I
> just missed it.
apt-g
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
PS: carefull with File://, apt-get source will create links into the
mirror and debuild will then erase the files from the repository and
replace them when you rebuild.
I guess I don't follow the warnings enough to heed them.
I thought looking at the man page of debuil
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:33:44PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> I thought looking at the man page of debuild would help, as I'm not
> familiar with debuild. But I didn't see a debian package in the
> repository called debuild. Perhaps it is spelled incorrectly? Or maybe I
> just missed it.
apt-g
"Thomas Viehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >PS: carefull with File://, apt-get source will create links into the
> >mirror and debuild will then erase the files from the repository and
> >replace them when you rebuild.
> While you're warning a
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
PS: carefull with File://, apt-get source will create links into the
mirror and debuild will then erase the files from the repository and
replace them when you rebuild.
I guess I don't follow the warnings enough to heed them.
I thought looking at the man page of de
"Thomas Viehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >PS: carefull with File://, apt-get source will create links into the
> >mirror and debuild will then erase the files from the repository and
> >replace them when you rebuild.
> While you're warning a
Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>PS: carefull with File://, apt-get source will create links into the
>mirror and debuild will then erase the files from the repository and
>replace them when you rebuild.
While you're warning about file://, how about including a reference to copy://?
Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > That means (replace {dist} and {section} with sid,main or sid,local):
> >
> > repository/dists/{dist}/{section}/binary-/Package.gz
> > reposirory/pool/
> >
> Question: Since this is a local-use only repository, wouldn't it make
> more sense to give this
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 08:51, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > MfG? (just curious)
>
> Mit freundliche Greusse
> It is German for
Not exactly.
"Mit freundlichen Grüßen"
[...]
> WfG
>
> With Friendly Greetings
Does that really exist in English?
Tom
>
>
> Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 05:02:31PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> Got it! My package installed! Thank you Thank you Thank you everyone. I
> think I was confusing the two types of repositories and how to access
> them (automagic & simple - from the repository howto).
>
> Sorry for delayed response.
Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>PS: carefull with File://, apt-get source will create links into the
>mirror and debuild will then erase the files from the repository and
>replace them when you rebuild.
While you're warning about file://, how about including a reference to copy://?
Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > That means (replace {dist} and {section} with sid,main or sid,local):
> >
> > repository/dists/{dist}/{section}/binary-/Package.gz
> > reposirory/pool/
> >
> Question: Since this is a local-use only repository, wouldn't it make
> more sense to give this
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 08:51, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > MfG? (just curious)
>
> Mit freundliche Greusse
> It is German for
Not exactly.
"Mit freundlichen Grüßen"
[...]
> WfG
>
> With Friendly Greetings
Does that really exist in English?
Tom
>
>
> Geert Stappers
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 05:02:31PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> Got it! My package installed! Thank you Thank you Thank you everyone. I
> think I was confusing the two types of repositories and how to access
> them (automagic & simple - from the repository howto).
>
> Sorry for delayed response.
Got it! My package installed! Thank you Thank you Thank you everyone. I
think I was confusing the two types of repositories and how to access
them (automagic & simple - from the repository howto).
Sorry for delayed response.
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Got it! My package installed! Thank you Thank you Thank you everyone. I
think I was confusing the two types of repositories and how to access
them (automagic & simple - from the repository howto).
Sorry for delayed response.
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/archive$ ls
> Packages.gz Sources.gz binary-i386 source
k... now this is where you are wrong
the structure should be like this :
~/archive/binary-i386/Packages.gz
~/archive/source/Sources.gz
and those two files point to wherever your packages might be
( normally you'd
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I did:
>
> I put the *.deb, *.dsc, *.diff, *.orig.tar.gz in public_html/pool
>
> I run dpkg-scanpackages pool /dev/null|gzip -9c> pool/Packages.gz in
> public_html
>
> I run dpkg-scansources pool|gzip -9c> pool/Sources.gz in public_html
>
> I added
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/archive$ ls
> Packages.gz Sources.gz binary-i386 source
k... now this is where you are wrong
the structure should be like this :
~/archive/binary-i386/Packages.gz
~/archive/source/Sources.gz
and those two files point to wherever your packages might be
( normally you'd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What I did:
I put the *.deb, *.dsc, *.diff, *.orig.tar.gz in public_html/pool
I run dpkg-scanpackages pool /dev/null|gzip -9c> pool/Packages.gz in
public_html
I run dpkg-scansources pool|gzip -9c> pool/Sources.gz in public_html
I added deb-src http
* Eric Winger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030822 23:20]:
> I think part of the problem, is that the original problem got lost. I'll
> snip your comments, because I believe I understand and correctly have
> implemented what you talked about. The problem is that for some reason,
> I can't install the pac
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I did:
>
> I put the *.deb, *.dsc, *.diff, *.orig.tar.gz in public_html/pool
>
> I run dpkg-scanpackages pool /dev/null|gzip -9c> pool/Packages.gz in
> public_html
>
> I run dpkg-scansources pool|gzip -9c> pool/Sources.gz in public_html
>
> I added
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What I did:
I put the *.deb, *.dsc, *.diff, *.orig.tar.gz in public_html/pool
I run dpkg-scanpackages pool /dev/null|gzip -9c> pool/Packages.gz in
public_html
I run dpkg-scansources pool|gzip -9c> pool/Sources.gz in public_html
I added deb-src http
* Eric Winger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030822 23:20]:
> I think part of the problem, is that the original problem got lost. I'll
> snip your comments, because I believe I understand and correctly have
> implemented what you talked about. The problem is that for some reason,
> I can't install the pac
On 08/22/03 17:00, Eric Winger wrote:
> I think part of the problem, is that the original problem got lost. I'll
> snip your comments, because I believe I understand and correctly have
Ok - firstly I want to clarify my previous post, regarding
documentation, which could be easily misconstrued.
W
On 08/22/03 17:00, Eric Winger wrote:
> I think part of the problem, is that the original problem got lost. I'll
> snip your comments, because I believe I understand and correctly have
Ok - firstly I want to clarify my previous post, regarding
documentation, which could be easily misconstrued.
W
Christopher Curtis wrote:
Eric: This is really very simple.
I think part of the problem, is that the original problem got lost. I'll
snip your comments, because I believe I understand and correctly have
implemented what you talked about. The problem is that for some reason,
I can't install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 22 August 2003 20:50, Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still missing something. Where should the .deb files be in
> relationship to the Packages.gz? I thought the same directory. Is
> that not correct?
I use the following:
* Pu
* Eric Winger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030822 22:03]:
> I'm still missing something. Where should the .deb files be in
> relationship to the Packages.gz? I thought the same directory. Is that
> not correct?
Well, at least I have lost the overview over this thread. I myself use
this script (courtesy
Eric Winger wrote:
I'm still missing something. Where should the .deb files be in
relationship to the Packages.gz? I thought the same directory. Is that
not correct?
Eric: This is really very simple. 'apt-get' is just a web browser.
Look at other repositories. Look at your sources.list an
Geert Stappers wrote:
I missed the architecture in your archive directory lay-out.
Architecture is something like 'alpha', 'powerpc'. or 'ia64'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/pub/debian/dists/sarge/main
$ pwd
/pub/debian/dists/sarge/main
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/pub/debian/dists/sarge/main
$ ls
binary-alpha bi
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:56:29AM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > >
> > > deb file:///home/ewinger/archive binary/
> >
> > These are incompatible. Either create Packages relative to archive (not
> > binary), or use
> >
> > deb file:///home/ewinger/archive/binary ./
> >
>
Christopher Curtis wrote:
Eric: This is really very simple.
I think part of the problem, is that the original problem got lost. I'll
snip your comments, because I believe I understand and correctly have
implemented what you talked about. The problem is that for some reason,
I can't install t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 22 August 2003 20:50, Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still missing something. Where should the .deb files be in
> relationship to the Packages.gz? I thought the same directory. Is
> that not correct?
I use the following:
* Pu
* Eric Winger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030822 22:03]:
> I'm still missing something. Where should the .deb files be in
> relationship to the Packages.gz? I thought the same directory. Is that
> not correct?
Well, at least I have lost the overview over this thread. I myself use
this script (courtesy
Eric Winger wrote:
I'm still missing something. Where should the .deb files be in
relationship to the Packages.gz? I thought the same directory. Is that
not correct?
Eric: This is really very simple. 'apt-get' is just a web browser.
Look at other repositories. Look at your sources.list and t
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> deb file:///home/ewinger/archive binary/
These are incompatible. Either create Packages relative to archive (not
binary), or use
deb file:///home/ewinger/archive/binary ./
or such
--
- mdz
I tried using
deb file:///home/ewinger/archive/binary ./
&
moving the
Geert Stappers wrote:
I missed the architecture in your archive directory lay-out.
Architecture is something like 'alpha', 'powerpc'. or 'ia64'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/pub/debian/dists/sarge/main
$ pwd
/pub/debian/dists/sarge/main
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/pub/debian/dists/sarge/main
$ ls
binary-alpha binary
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:56:29AM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > >
> > > deb file:///home/ewinger/archive binary/
> >
> > These are incompatible. Either create Packages relative to archive (not
> > binary), or use
> >
> > deb file:///home/ewinger/archive/binary ./
> >
>
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:13:11AM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> The Packages.gz was created with: (from inside ~/archive/binary)
>
> apt-ftparchive packages . > /dev/null | gzip > Packages.gz
>
> The Sources.gz was created with: (from inside ~/archive/binary)
>
> apt-ftparchive sources . > /dev/
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> deb file:///home/ewinger/archive binary/
These are incompatible. Either create Packages relative to archive (not
binary), or use
deb file:///home/ewinger/archive/binary ./
or such
--
- mdz
I tried using
deb file:///home/ewinger/archive/binary ./
&
moving the conten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does the tree structure of your repository look like (where are the
packages , where is Packages.gz etc ) and where do you point to in
/etc/apt/sources.list ?
The directory structure of my archive looks like this:
~/archive/binary$ ls
Packages.gz spinelli
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:13:11AM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> The Packages.gz was created with: (from inside ~/archive/binary)
>
> apt-ftparchive packages . > /dev/null | gzip > Packages.gz
>
> The Sources.gz was created with: (from inside ~/archive/binary)
>
> apt-ftparchive sources . > /dev/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does the tree structure of your repository look like (where are the
packages , where is Packages.gz etc ) and where do you point to in
/etc/apt/sources.list ?
The directory structure of my archive looks like this:
~/archive/binary$ ls
Packages.gz spinelli_0.9
> Forgot to mention that I got this after doing apt-get update:
>
> Ign file: binary/ Release
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
>
> I thought that the first line might have been ok because I'm not doing
> any pinning. Maybe that was a bad assumption.
>
> apt-cache p
Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Probably a simple question. But I've created a local
> repository. Figured out how dput moved packages into the
> archive. Worked through atp-ftparchive and created a Packages.gz file,
> got sources-list to point at my archive correctly.
>
>
> But when I
> Forgot to mention that I got this after doing apt-get update:
>
> Ign file: binary/ Release
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
>
> I thought that the first line might have been ok because I'm not doing
> any pinning. Maybe that was a bad assumption.
>
> apt-cache p
Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Probably a simple question. But I've created a local
> repository. Figured out how dput moved packages into the
> archive. Worked through atp-ftparchive and created a Packages.gz file,
> got sources-list to point at my archive correctly.
>
>
> But when I
Forgot to mention that I got this after doing apt-get update:
Ign file: binary/ Release
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
I thought that the first line might have been ok because I'm not doing
any pinning. Maybe that was a bad assumption.
apt-cache policy spinelli
Forgot to mention that I got this after doing apt-get update:
Ign file: binary/ Release
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
I thought that the first line might have been ok because I'm not doing
any pinning. Maybe that was a bad assumption.
apt-cache policy spinelli re
Eric Winger wrote:
But when I do a
apt-get install spinelli (spinelli is my package)
I get this message.
E: Package spinelli has no installation candidate
I assume the 'apt-get update' succeeded;
Try apt-cache policy spinelli
Also - look at your packages file and make sure the File: header po
Probably a simple question. But I've created a local repository. Figured
out how dput moved packages into the archive. Worked through
atp-ftparchive and created a Packages.gz file, got sources-list to point
at my archive correctly.
But when I do a
apt-get install spinelli (spinelli is my packa
Eric Winger wrote:
But when I do a
apt-get install spinelli (spinelli is my package)
I get this message.
E: Package spinelli has no installation candidate
I assume the 'apt-get update' succeeded;
Try apt-cache policy spinelli
Also - look at your packages file and make sure the File: header points
Probably a simple question. But I've created a local repository. Figured
out how dput moved packages into the archive. Worked through
atp-ftparchive and created a Packages.gz file, got sources-list to point
at my archive correctly.
But when I do a
apt-get install spinelli (spinelli is my packag
56 matches
Mail list logo
