Re: after the eventual non-US merge into main

2001-08-02 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 09:28:08PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > Should the new powstatd (say 1.5.1-2) have: > > Package: powstatd > Version: 1.5.1-2 > Provides: ups-monitor > Conflicts: powstatd-crypt, ups-monitor > Replaces: powstatd-crypt (<< 1.5.1-2) > > Does the version in the Repla

Re: after the eventual non-US merge into main

2001-08-01 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 09:28:08PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > Should the new powstatd (say 1.5.1-2) have: > > Package: powstatd > Version: 1.5.1-2 > Provides: ups-monitor > Conflicts: powstatd-crypt, ups-monitor > Replaces: powstatd-crypt (<< 1.5.1-2) > > Does the version in the Repl

after the eventual non-US merge into main

2001-08-01 Thread Peter S Galbraith
I maintain the packages powstatd and powstatd-crypt. They are identical, except that powstatd-crypt has encrypted communication between master and slave computers on a single UPS. After the eventual non-US merge into main, I'd like for package powstatd-crypt to be renamed powstatd and fo

after the eventual non-US merge into main

2001-08-01 Thread Peter S Galbraith
I maintain the packages powstatd and powstatd-crypt. They are identical, except that powstatd-crypt has encrypted communication between master and slave computers on a single UPS. After the eventual non-US merge into main, I'd like for package powstatd-crypt to be renamed powstatd and fo