Re: Upstream maintainer disagree with the package name

2001-05-27 Thread Joey Hess
Rémi Perrot wrote: > I recently upload a new package called libglade-perl. After some mail > exchange with the upstream maintainer (Dermot Musgrove > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), he say that libglade-perl is not > a library and he ask me to change the name of the package to glade-perl. > > He is not wron

Re: Upstream maintainer disagree with the package name

2001-05-27 Thread Joey Hess
Rémi Perrot wrote: > I recently upload a new package called libglade-perl. After some mail > exchange with the upstream maintainer (Dermot Musgrove > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), he say that libglade-perl is not > a library and he ask me to change the name of the package to glade-perl. > > He is not wro

Re: Upstream maintainer disagree with the package name

2001-05-26 Thread Drew Parsons
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 10:50:18AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:44:46PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote: > > Hi, (Remi? Rimi? mutt doesn't display the second character, as you can see). Yes it does. You probably haven't set your locale to see it. [The '?' in R?mi, above, is

Re: Upstream maintainer disagree with the package name

2001-05-26 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:44:46PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote: > I recently upload a new package called libglade-perl. After some mail > exchange with the upstream maintainer (Dermot Musgrove > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), he say that libglade-perl is not > a library and he ask me to change the name of the

Re: Upstream maintainer disagree with the package name

2001-05-26 Thread Drew Parsons
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 10:50:18AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:44:46PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote: > > Hi, (Remi? Rimi? mutt doesn't display the second character, as you can see). Yes it does. You probably haven't set your locale to see it. [The '?' in R?mi, above, is

Re: Upstream maintainer disagree with the package name

2001-05-26 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:44:46PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote: > PS: here is part of the dpkg-dev -c result of libglade-perl > ... > -rw-r--r-- root/root 74828 2001-02-10 17:07:33 > ./usr/lib/perl5/Glade/PerlUIGtk.pm [...] > -rw-r--r-- root/root 43005 2001-02-10 17:07:33 > ./usr/lib/perl5/G

Re: Upstream maintainer disagree with the package name

2001-05-26 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:44:46PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote: > I recently upload a new package called libglade-perl. After some mail > exchange with the upstream maintainer (Dermot Musgrove > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), he say that libglade-perl is not > a library and he ask me to change the name of the

Re: Upstream maintainer disagree with the package name

2001-05-26 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:44:46PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote: > PS: here is part of the dpkg-dev -c result of libglade-perl > ... > -rw-r--r-- root/root 74828 2001-02-10 17:07:33 ./usr/lib/perl5/Glade/PerlUIGtk.pm [...] > -rw-r--r-- root/root 43005 2001-02-10 17:07:33 >./usr/lib/perl5/Glad

Upstream maintainer disagree with the package name

2001-05-26 Thread Rémi Perrot
I recently upload a new package called libglade-perl. After some mail exchange with the upstream maintainer (Dermot Musgrove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), he say that libglade-perl is not a library and he ask me to change the name of the package to glade-perl. He is not wrong since in fact it is a perl ge

Upstream maintainer disagree with the package name

2001-05-26 Thread Rémi Perrot
I recently upload a new package called libglade-perl. After some mail exchange with the upstream maintainer (Dermot Musgrove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), he say that libglade-perl is not a library and he ask me to change the name of the package to glade-perl. He is not wrong since in fact it is a perl g