On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 03:45:51PM +, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Thanks, I do have a sponsor, just have not had a response from him.
Then you should use the RFS mechanism.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> I have uploaded my latest package here:
> > https://mentors.debian.net/package/libgrokj2k/
> > I would greatly appreciate help uploading the package to unstable
>
>
> Please use the RFS mechanism.
>
> --
> WBR, wRAR
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 01:43:19PM +, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> Dear Mentors,
>
> I have uploaded my latest package here:
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libgrokj2k/
> I would greatly appreciate help uploading the package to unstable
Please use the RFS mechanism.
Dear Mentors,
I have uploaded my latest package here:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libgrokj2k/
I would greatly appreciate help uploading the package to unstable
Many Thanks,
Aaron
>> Dear Mentors,
>
>> I have uploaded my latest package here:
>> https://mento
reuploaded alrady with the one using the one in the archives, so
> this should(tm) appear soon.
>
Yes, it did.
- Forwarded message from Debian FTP Masters -
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 13:22:35 +
From: Debian FTP Masters
To: t...@debian.org, Zixing Liu , Debian Rust
Maintainers
On 28.02.24 23:59, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hello,
dumb question: in an error I uploaded luametatex 2.11.01+ds-2 to Debian
unstable. This was a mistake, it should have been uploaded to
experimental, as it is part of the upcoming TL 2024. Is it possible to
downgrade the Debian archive (unstable
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM ALL LISTS!
I tried to remove myself. It didn't work.
I tried to contact the list admin. I did not get an answer.
I'M GONNA SPAM YOUR LISTS UNTIL YOU REMOVE ME!
On 05.03.24 23:30, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
On 04.03.2024 02:09, Loren M. Lang wrote:
Hi,
Have you just tried
On 04.03.2024 02:09, Loren M. Lang wrote:
Hi,
Have you just tried passing through -S from gbp? As in "gbp
buildpackage -S"? It might not work if you have set a different
builder like schroot, but you can just pass --git-builder=debuild or
similar in that case.
Yes, I tried that option "-S",
umber
> > than the mistaken upload of 2.11.01+ds-3 and thus replace it in package
> > upgrades. You'd then continue with this pattern for 2.10.x updates
> > until the eventual proper migration of 2.11 to unstable, at which point
> > you can simplify the version numbering
n continue with this pattern for 2.10.x updates
until the eventual proper migration of 2.11 to unstable, at which point
you can simplify the version numbering back to '2'11.x'.
I'm sure you'll agree that option B would probably be preferable.
Yes, agreed. Currently I&
Did we ever implement the "bump epoch should go to new queue"?
I would like to see packages going in some new queue, this way ftpmasters can
check if the epoch bump was a mistake or not.
(and I can't just test by myself, I don't want to risk bumping epoch on my
packages!)
G.
Il giovedì 29
Hi,
> a) The version numbering rules provide for a '1:' prefix to be used to
>deal with version numbering mistakes. A version number starting with
>'1:' counts as higher than any without such a prefix; a '2:' counts as
>higher than '1:', etc. So you could re-upload 2.10.08+ds-1 with version
>numbe
I believe the correct answer is as follows:
You can't simply remove the updated package from the unstable archive,
once it's in it's in. Package version numbering must always increase in
order that package upgrading does not get confused. There are two
solutions to a situation
Hello,
dumb question: in an error I uploaded luametatex 2.11.01+ds-2 to Debian
unstable. This was a mistake, it should have been uploaded to
experimental, as it is part of the upcoming TL 2024. Is it possible to
downgrade the Debian archive (unstable) to 2.10.08+ds-1 and upload the
2.11.01
:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libkysdk-base/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libk/libkysdk-
base/libkysdk-base_2.2.0.0-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
libkysdk-base (2.2.0.0-1) unst
licy [1]. This means that from now on key packages [2] and
> packages without significant autopkgtest coverage need to be unblocked
> by the release team to be able to migrate from unstable to testing. If
> you need to request an unblock, check that your request is in line
> with the freez
e one step closer to the release of
bookworm. Like mentioned before we expect everyone to follow the
freeze policy [1]. This means that from now on key packages [2] and
packages without significant autopkgtest coverage need to be unblocked
by the release team to be able to migrate from unstable to te
Thanks, Santiago. How do I contact the release team to ask about unblock ?
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:17 AM Santiago Ruano Rincón <
santiag...@riseup.net> wrote:
> El 20/03/23 a las 11:08, Aaron Boxer escribió:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I have successfully created a patched version of libgrokj2k to f
El 20/03/23 a las 11:08, Aaron Boxer escribió:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have successfully created a patched version of libgrokj2k to fix a serious
> encoder bug.
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libgrokj2k/
Without looking at the bug itself, I'd file an RC bug to keep a record
about why you are t
Hi Folks,
I have successfully created a patched version of libgrokj2k to fix a serious
encoder bug.
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libgrokj2k/
Help uploading this to unstable would be greatly appreciated !
Thanks,
Aaron
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 11:00 AM Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 10:11:45AM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> > I just uploaded a new package for version 10.0 of this library.
> > Would someone be so kind as to upload the new package to unstable ?
> >
> >
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 10:11:45AM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> I just uploaded a new package for version 10.0 of this library.
> Would someone be so kind as to upload the new package to unstable ?
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libgrokj2k/
--- libgrokj2k-9.7.5/debian/changel
Hi Folk,
I just uploaded a new package for version 10.0 of this library.
Would someone be so kind as to upload the new package to unstable ?
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libgrokj2k/
Many Thanks,
Aaron
Hi,
Am Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:09:23PM +0100 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
>
> So, I have skimmed over the build logs and one of the main issues is the use
> of
> -march flags to enforce a certain baseline [1]:
>
> powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option
> ‘-mar
retitle 962159 RFS: ddclient/3.9.1-3 [ITA] -- address updating utility for
dynamic DNS services
thanks
I just uploaded ddclient 3.9.1-3 to mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/ddclient
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ddclient/-/tags/debian%2F3.9.1-3
I decided to abandon my attempts to sup
I just uploaded ddclient-3.9.1-2 to mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/ddclient
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ddclient/-/tags/debian%2F3.9.1-2
It contains some changes from Andreas Henriksson, plus I silenced a lintian
false positive and edited debian/changelog to add an entry for an
hat it is targetting the UNRELEASED distribution.
So I guess there are some changes that you still want to apply before
building a release?
No -- I just left it that way because I wasn't sure what the protocol was, and
I thought you might have some suggested changes. I changed the release
Hi Richard,
I reviewed your ddclient package in depth and consider it great work.
For reference, here are the hashes of the dsc that I checked:
> Checksums-Sha256:
> e4969e15cc491fc52bdcd649d4c2b0e4b1bf0c9f9dba23471c634871acc52470 63469
> ddclient_3.9.1.orig.tar.gz
> 1aa53a616911e2149de8adf5c
Thanks!
I can do commit now.
在 2020/5/22 上午2:47, Mattia Rizzolo 写道:
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 10:53:40AM +0800, atzlinux 肖盛文 wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm the new maintainer of the package.
>>
>> please give me the rights on salsa official package git.
>>
>> package name: yiyantang
>>
>> my sals
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 10:53:40AM +0800, atzlinux 肖盛文 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the new maintainer of the package.
>
> please give me the rights on salsa official package git.
>
> package name: yiyantang
>
> my salsa username: atzlinux-guest
>
> url: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/yiyant
EPTED into unstable
日期: Fri, 15 May 2020 15:50:41 +
发件人: Debian FTP Masters
收件人: xiao sheng wen , ba...@debian.org
Accepted:
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 19:33:45 +0800
Source: yiyantang
Architecture: source
Version: 0.7.0-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maint
Yeah!
I'd get the rights.
Thanks!
在 2020/5/11 下午9:51, Kyle Robbertze 写道:
> Hi
>
> On 2020/05/11 13:49, atzlinux 肖盛文 wrote:
>> o! sorry! The official package git repo afio is already created before.
>>
>> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/afio
>>
>>
>> Please only give me the rights , username: a
Hi
On 2020/05/11 13:49, atzlinux 肖盛文 wrote:
> o! sorry! The official package git repo afio is already created before.
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/afio
>
>
> Please only give me the rights , username: atzlinux-guest
>
Done
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Kyle Robbertze
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer
Please help me to create a official package git repo on salsa, and
> also give me the rights.
>
> salsa repo package name : afio
>
> my salsa username: atzlinux-guest
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> 转发的消息 ----
> 主题: Accepted afio 2.5.2-1 (sourc
ource amd64) into unstable, unstable
日期: Mon, 11 May 2020 10:00:09 +
发件人: Debian FTP Masters
回复地址: xiao sheng wen
收件人: debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 19:17:31 +0800
Source: afio
Binary: afio
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.
tnftp repo is work normal now, my account rights is also OK.
Thanks!
在 2020/5/11 下午5:16, Kyle Robbertze 写道:
> Hi,
>
> On 2020/05/11 02:58, atzlinux 肖盛文 wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> I'm the new maintainer of the package.
>>
>> Please help me to create a official package git repo on salsa, and
>> al
Hi,
On 2020/05/11 02:58, atzlinux 肖盛文 wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'm the new maintainer of the package.
>
> Please help me to create a official package git repo on salsa, and
> also give me the rights.
>
> salsa repo package name : tnftp
>
> my salsa username: atzlinux-guest
Done
--
⢀
anges ACCEPTED into unstable
日期: Sun, 10 May 2020 19:18:50 +
发件人: Debian FTP Masters
收件人: xiao sheng wen , kilob...@angband.pl
Accepted:
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 22:01:50 +0800
Source: tnftp
Architecture: source
Version: 20151004-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: m
Hi
I just want to chip in a little. It was actually my idea to remove the
names from the AUTHORS file. The reason was that I could not find any code
left from the AUTHORS of cron-apt. Except potentially one or a few lines
that I know that I or Marc wrote. This was not to discredit anyone or make
a
First, thank you very much for your reply.
Indeed, even if I do not write English fluently, I could have read it
again before posting. I now see my horrible mistakes, and I beg your
pardon.
Yes, this is a one more tool like ansible/chef/ puppet/propellor/…
The fact that there are still so many
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 11:51:53AM +0100, Jean Jacques BRUCKER wrote:
> What's next ? What did I do wrong ? May someone with super powers
> consider this package, and tells me if it can be integrated upstream
First of all: I am likely the wrong person to reply to this mail.
Second: Reading so
Can someone give a status of the kt-update's package which could be
great to have in the unstable repository (or at least in the
experimental one for the moment) ?
I first talk about this tools I made for our Debian derivative fews
month ago:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/20
Hi,
I think I was able to hunt down two of the three C++ issues but I'm
stumbling here:
...
[ 90%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/ccs.dir/main/ccs.cpp.o
cd /build/unanimity-3.4.1+git20180307.02aa264+dfsg/build/src && /usr/bin/c++
-I/build/unanimity-3.4.1+git20180307.02aa264+dfsg/include
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 06:39:33PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> cd /build/1st/unanimity-3.3.0+dfsg/build/src && /usr/bin/cmake -E
> cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/gcpp.dir/link.txt --verbose=1
> /build/1st/unanimity-3.3.0+dfsg/src/main/ccs.cpp: In function ‘int
> Runner(
:
>
> mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
> mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto
>
> > Bug#935223: Removed package(s) from unstable
>
> Please note the extra steps required when reintroducing packages:
>
> www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.html
>
> --
> bye,
> pabs
>
> wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
rs/rfs-howto
> Bug#935223: Removed package(s) from unstable
Please note the extra steps required when reintroducing packages:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.html#reintroducing-pkgs
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
FTP Masters
(Bug#935223: Removed package(s) from unstable)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:45:41 +
From: Debian Bug Tracking System
Reply-To: 927...@bugs.debian.org
To: Antonio Russo
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the src:kcollectd package
unstable, is here:
https://salsa.debian.org/paolog-guest/doxygen
Paolo
Hi,
I'd like to update cimg[1] but the build fails in an unstable
chroot due to an invalid LaTeX file
...
[26] [27]) [28] (./group__cimg__displays.tex) [29] (./group__cimg__storage.tex)
[30] (./group__cimg__files__io.tex) [31] (./group__cimg__options.tex
! Missing } ins
sounds awesome :)
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 10:54 PM Svante Signell wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2019-01-06 at 18:37 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 04:41:51PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> > > That is a different thing: once the dependencies on Hurd are fixed,
> > > you
> >
> > Of co
On Sun, 2019-01-06 at 18:37 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 04:41:51PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> > That is a different thing: once the dependencies on Hurd are fixed,
> > you
>
> Of course the hurd issue turned out more complex once I actually read
> past the first post,
my schedule.
> > As I stated, removing from testing looks much simpler
>
> But it would happen automatically once the package is not in unstable,
> right?
Yup.
My suggestion was to get it out of buster sooner, as that would "fix"
the autopkgtest regression of numpy.
--
Mattia Rizzolo writes:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 09:24:06PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> I have a source package (python-astropy) that I now want to remove from
>> unstable. I took care that all reverse dependencies were removed now in
>> recent uploads. As suggested i
On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 09:24:06PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> I have a source package (python-astropy) that I now want to remove from
> unstable. I took care that all reverse dependencies were removed now in
> recent uploads. As suggested in [1], I first issued
>
> $
Hi,
I have a source package (python-astropy) that I now want to remove from
unstable. I took care that all reverse dependencies were removed now in
recent uploads. As suggested in [1], I first issued
$ ssh mirror.ftp-master.debian.org "dak rm -Rn python-astropy"
to see whether it
018 11:50:59 -0400
> Source: debian-timeline
> Binary: debian-timeline
> Architecture: source
> Version: 40
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: medium
> Maintainer: Debian publicity team
> Changed-By: Boyuan Yang <073p...@gmail.com>
> Description:
> debian-timelin
Hi,
I was writing an autopkgtest for kmer [1] and faced a SEGFAULT error while
testing one of kmer's binaries — atac in testing/unstable [2].
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/kmer
[2] https://ci.debian.net/packages/k/kmer/
Notably, that building and testing atac in stable were succe
Hi Andreas
On 10-05-18 22:08, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:57:54PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> |
>> | ftp.debian.org is the right pseudo-package for removal (of the 0.8-1
>> | packages) from unstable.
>>
>> Ok, thanks, filed as #89835
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:57:54PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |
> | ftp.debian.org is the right pseudo-package for removal (of the 0.8-1
> | packages) from unstable.
>
> Ok, thanks, filed as #898354.
Seems that bug is somehow needed for this specific issue. However, I
th
ctory and should have been 'all'
> all
> | > along.
> | >
> | > Any idea how we can correct that at the repo? Shall we file a bug with
> release.d.o?
> |
> | ftp.debian.org is the right pseudo-package for removal (of the 0.8-1
> | packages) from unst
.
| >
| > Any idea how we can correct that at the repo? Shall we file a bug with
release.d.o?
|
| ftp.debian.org is the right pseudo-package for removal (of the 0.8-1
| packages) from unstable.
Ok, thanks, filed as #898354.
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
Shall we file a bug with
> release.d.o?
ftp.debian.org is the right pseudo-package for removal (of the 0.8-1
packages) from unstable.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
r-cran-dbi:
| Installed: 0.8-1
| Candidate: 0.8-1
| Version table:
| *** 0.8-1 501
| 501 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
| 50 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
| 50 http://ftp.debian.org/debian unstable/main
0.8-1 501
501 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
50 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
50 http://ftp.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
May be this will "
control: close -1
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:31:27 +0100 Nicolas Braud-Santoni
wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> Upload was rejected (something something non-existing signature file
> referenced
> in .changes); I'm just reopening this so we don't forget about it.
I'm trying harder.
G.
signature.
Control: reopen -1
Upload was rejected (something something non-existing signature file referenced
in .changes); I'm just reopening this so we don't forget about it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> So it should be fine to release various packages currently being held
> in experimental to unstable.
Unstable is back in business, but testing is still frozen.
Please note you still need to co-ordinate with the release team for trans
ious packages currently being held
> in experimental to unstable.
> Right?
Yes, it's fine to upload packages to unstable again. Just remember to
coordinate transitions with the release team beforehand (if your package
would start a transition).
Ansgar
ental to unstable.
Right?
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
Hi lumin,
2016-12-02 14:36 GMT-02:00 lumin :
> Hi mentors,
>
> I need advise on the way maintaining symbols control file when
> the mangled C++ symbols are unstable.
>
> I'm maintaining a package named "Caffe". I migrated the same
> source from experimental
On 02/12/16 18:11, Jérémy Lal wrote:
2016-12-02 18:08 GMT+01:00 Ghislain Vaillant :
On 02/12/16 16:36, lumin wrote:
Hi mentors,
I need advise on the way maintaining symbols control file when
the mangled C++ symbols are unstable.
I'm maintaining a package named "Caffe". I mi
Hi,
>I need advise on the way maintaining symbols control file when
>the mangled C++ symbols are unstable.
maintaining symbols on C++ projects is a nightmare.
and do subsequent uploads is done also by qt* folks
(see e.g. qtbase uploads).
You can consider however some things, e.g. m
2016-12-02 18:08 GMT+01:00 Ghislain Vaillant :
> On 02/12/16 16:36, lumin wrote:
>>
>> Hi mentors,
>>
>> I need advise on the way maintaining symbols control file when
>> the mangled C++ symbols are unstable.
>>
>> I'm maintaining a package
On 02/12/16 16:36, lumin wrote:
Hi mentors,
I need advise on the way maintaining symbols control file when
the mangled C++ symbols are unstable.
I'm maintaining a package named "Caffe". I migrated the same
source from experimental to unstable, and it FTBFS'ed as you
se
Hi mentors,
I need advise on the way maintaining symbols control file when
the mangled C++ symbols are unstable.
I'm maintaining a package named "Caffe". I migrated the same
source from experimental to unstable, and it FTBFS'ed as you
see at [0], due to the mangled C++ symb
* Giulio Paci , 2016-06-08, 11:48:
In #825236, Giulio asked me about uploading phonetisaurus to unstable.
If I were the maintainer, I would hesitate to make such upload until
the following is done:
I forgot one thing:
* phonetisaurus-calculateER should escape arguments before passing them
Hi Jakub,
thank you for your comments.
On 05/06/2016 13:35, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> In #825236, Giulio asked me about uploading phonetisaurus to unstable.
> If I were the maintainer, I would hesitate to make such upload until the
> followin
In #825236, Giulio asked me about uploading phonetisaurus to unstable.
If I were the maintainer, I would hesitate to make such upload until
the following is done:
* 1001_fix_binaries_return_values.patch is accepted upstream. (Are they
alive?)
* The system-wide UTF8-CPP is used, instead of
: 3.20.4-1
Version table:
*** 3.20.4-1 501
501 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libgtk-3-0:
Installed: 3.20.4-1
Candidate: 3.20.4-1
Version table:
3.20.5-1 50
50 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian unstable/main
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 02:39:33PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Unstable mirrors seem to miss libgtk-3-common binary package even if it
> belongs to the same source as libgtk-3-0 and tracker lists all
> versions[1] also of libgtk-3-common. I'm observing this effect in my
> pbuil
On 05/22/2016 02:39 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Any hint?
The arch:all package cannot be built on the buildds:
https://bugs.debian.org/824999
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
libgtk-3-0:
Installed: 3.20.4-1
Candidate: 3.20.4-1
Version table:
3.20.5-1 50
50 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
50 http://ftp.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
50 http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd buildd
On 05/08/2016 11:55 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 09:40:02PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> James Cowgill:
>>> On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 20:17 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
>>>> gearmand package has stuck in unstable due to missing -
On 05/08/2016 09:00 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 19:57 +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 20:17 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> gearmand package has stuck in
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 09:40:02PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> James Cowgill:
> > On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 20:17 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> >> gearmand package has stuck in unstable due to missing -dbg packages:
> >>
> >> https://release.debian.org/m
James Cowgill:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 20:17 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> gearmand package has stuck in unstable due to missing -dbg packages:
>>
>> https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gearmand
>
On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 19:57 +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 20:17 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > gearmand package has stuck in unstable due to missing -dbg
> > packages:
> >
> > http
Hi,
On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 20:17 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> gearmand package has stuck in unstable due to missing -dbg packages:
>
> https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gearmand
>
> The debug packages were removed after switchi
Hi All,
gearmand package has stuck in unstable due to missing -dbg packages:
https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gearmand
The debug packages were removed after switching to automatic debug
packages [0].
How do I force the migration ? What is the right way to switch to
sts
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pam-ufpidentity"
>
> * Package name: pam-ufpidentity
>Version : 1.0-debian2~unstable
>Upstream Author : Richard Levenberg
> * URL
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 01:21:06PM +0100, toogley wrote:
> > the wicd package currently has version 1.7.3 in unstable and testing, but
> > 1.7.4 is already imported. Generally speaking it seems to me very reasonable
> > to try to up
forgot to reply to the list..
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: reason not to upload new versions as fast as possible to
unstable? (expect attempt to migrate to testing )
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:43:00 +0100
From: toogley
To: Gianfranco Costamagna ,
801...@bugs.debian.org
anco Costamagna wrote:
Hi,
the wicd package currently has version 1.7.3 in unstable and testing,
but 1.7.4 is already imported. Generally speaking it seems to me very
reasonable to try to upload versions as fast as possible into unstable
and testing, so I'm just asking for clarification:
A
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 01:21:06PM +0100, toogley wrote:
> the wicd package currently has version 1.7.3 in unstable and testing, but
> 1.7.4 is already imported. Generally speaking it seems to me very reasonable
> to try to upload versions as fast as possible into unstable and testing,
Hi,
>the wicd package currently has version 1.7.3 in unstable and testing,
>but 1.7.4 is already imported. Generally speaking it seems to me very
>reasonable to try to upload versions as fast as possible into unstable
>and testing, so I'm just asking for clarification:
>
Hey,
the wicd package currently has version 1.7.3 in unstable and testing,
but 1.7.4 is already imported. Generally speaking it seems to me very
reasonable to try to upload versions as fast as possible into unstable
and testing, so I'm just asking for clarification:
Apart from wanti
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pam-ufpidentity"
* Package name: pam-ufpidentity
Version : 1.0-debian2~unstable
Upstream Author : Richard Levenberg
* URL : https://
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Is this simply a library transition issue and is somebody working in it?
Yes, the libstdc++ GCC5 ABI transition just started:
https://wiki.debian.org/GCC5
Various things will be uninstallable for a while.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian
Hi,
I intended to build opensurgsim[1] using pbuilder (called from gbp) but I got
...
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libstdc++6 : Breaks: libboost-date-time1.55.0 but 1.55.0+dfsg-4 is to be
installed.
Breaks: libdap17 (<= 3.14.0-2) but 3.14.0-2 is to be installed.
Hi,
Quoting PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel (2015-07-10 10:54:20)
> Is it possible to configure this per chroot in order to avoir passing this
> command line each time ?
No.
But if bug #790354 (with patch) gets resolved, then you will able to pass a
custom configuration file which you can then use to se
1 - 100 of 416 matches
Mail list logo
