On Sun, October 1, 2006 15:18, Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
>> I: uzbek.wordlist source: build-depends-without-arch-dep
>> dictionaries-common-dev
>> N:
>> N: The control file lists the given package in Build-Depends, but no
>> N: architecture-dependent packages are built. If all the packag
On Sunday 1 October 2006 11:28, James Westby wrote:
> I run
> lintian -I -m -i
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/deb/hunspell-uz$ lintian -v -I -m -i
uzbek.wordlist_0.6-1_i386.changes
N: Setting up lab in /tmp/CJ7qlH1rwE ...
N: Processing changes file uzbek.wordlist_0.6-1_i386.changes ...
N: Processing 2
On (01/10/06 13:18), Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
> On Sunday 30 October 2006 19:43, James Westby wrote:
>
> > I have found just one more problem, lintian says
> >
> > I: uzbek.wordlist source: build-depends-without-arch-dep
> > dictionaries-common-dev
> > N:
> > N: The control file lists the
On Sunday 30 October 2006 19:43, James Westby wrote:
> I have found just one more problem, lintian says
>
> I: uzbek.wordlist source: build-depends-without-arch-dep
> dictionaries-common-dev
> N:
> N: The control file lists the given package in Build-Depends, but no
> N: architecture
On (21/09/06 15:55), Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 14:01, James Westby wrote:
>
> > Not the tarball that I downloaded. It only contained a .tar.gz. I see it
> > is fixed in this version though. Thanks for that.
>
> Anybody to sponsor it? Please. :-)
>
Hi,
I have found
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 14:01, James Westby wrote:
> Not the tarball that I downloaded. It only contained a .tar.gz. I see it
> is fixed in this version though. Thanks for that.
Anybody to sponsor it? Please. :-)
Mashrab.
--
Mashrab Kuvatov
PGP key: www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/kmashrab.asc
On (19/09/06 19:30), Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 19/09/06, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A Debian native package is a program written specifically to Debian,
>
> A package is not a program. s/to/for/ =>
>
> "A Debian native package is a package of a program written
> specifically f
On 19/09/06, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting your site:
>
> "A Debian native package is a package that is specific to Debian, and
> would not be of interest to say Fedora. Godd examples are dpkg and apt
> tools."
>
> Actually, apt and dpkg are used by at least one project outsid
On (19/09/06 22:56), Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 01:01:15PM +0100, James Westby a écrit :
> >
> > See http://jameswestby.net/mentors/glossary/native.html
>
> Hi James,
>
> Quoting your site:
>
> "A Debian native package is a package that is specific to Debian, and
> would no
Le Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 01:01:15PM +0100, James Westby a écrit :
>
> See http://jameswestby.net/mentors/glossary/native.html
Hi James,
Quoting your site:
"A Debian native package is a package that is specific to Debian, and
would not be of interest to say Fedora. Godd examples are dpkg and apt
On (19/09/06 12:27), Neil Williams wrote:
> Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 September 2006 03:44, James Westby wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, I can't sponsor as I am not a DD, but I have some comments,
> >>
> >> * I don't think the package should be Debian native.
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understan
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 13:27, Neil Williams wrote:
> AFAICT, the ITP claims 0.6-1 (which is not a Debian native package
> version) but your link to the "package" (the .tar.bz2 a tarball of built
> packages) uses version number 0.6 (which WOULD indicate a Debian native
> package.)
>
> http://
Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 03:44, James Westby wrote:
>
>> Hi, I can't sponsor as I am not a DD, but I have some comments,
>>
>> * I don't think the package should be Debian native.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Could you please explain what you
> mean
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 03:44, James Westby wrote:
> Hi, I can't sponsor as I am not a DD, but I have some comments,
>
> * I don't think the package should be Debian native.
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Could you please explain what you
mean?
> * The debian/copyright file n
On (17/09/06 13:10), Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've filed an ITP bug report #387824 for hunspell-uz and uploaded the files
> I've built into
> http://www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/uzbek-word-list/hunspell-uz-0.6.deb.tar.bz2
>
Hi, I can't sponsor as I am not a DD, but I have some commen
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:01, Philipp Benner wrote:
> Don't think that your dictionary depends on the cpu arch (at least
> hunspell-de-de doesn't), so you should change "Architecture: any" to
> "Architecture: all" in debian/control.
Fixed.
> Anyhow, you should change your debian/rules to build only
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:10:19 +
Mashrab Kuvatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've filed an ITP bug report #387824 for hunspell-uz and uploaded the files
> I've built into
> http://www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/uzbek-word-list/hunspell-uz-0.6.deb.tar.bz2
Don't think that your dictio
Hi all,
I've filed an ITP bug report #387824 for hunspell-uz and uploaded the files
I've built into
http://www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/uzbek-word-list/hunspell-uz-0.6.deb.tar.bz2
Building stuff is based on hunspell-de-de. This is an output of lintian:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/deb/hunspell-uz$ lintia
18 matches
Mail list logo
