Re: Sources with missing dependencies

2005-04-14 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2005-04-13 09:07:39, schrieb Christoph Haas: > Moin, Michelle... > Have you tried using pbuilder? It gets all the dependencies Not curently, but the weekend where I will have more time... > automatically for you and builds the package. That way you can also > easily make sure that you declare

Re: Sources with missing dependencies

2005-04-13 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2005-04-13 08:36:57, schrieb Kevin B. McCarty: > > 1) What should I do in such situation? > > > > Write a BUG report against the package ? > > Yes, please file a bug against the package with severity "grave". If > the package can be built on sid, but not on sarge, then also tag the bug

Re: Sources with missing dependencies

2005-04-13 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Michelle Konzack wrote: > dpkg-buildpackage ... > 8< > > and now it stops, because missing build dependencies. > > Now two quesions: > > 1) What should I do in such situation? > > Write a BUG report against the package ? Yes, please file a

Re: Sources with missing dependencies

2005-04-13 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Michael, Am 2005-04-13 11:29:09, schrieb Michael Koch: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 12:05:37PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > Thanks, now I know what FTBFS is. :-) > > Only packages are in main with FTBFS are Release Critical. FTPFS in > contrib and non-free are wishlist bugs. :-) I am

Re: Sources with missing dependencies

2005-04-13 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 12:05:37PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Alexander, > > Am 2005-04-13 11:48:53, schrieb Alexander Schmehl: > > * Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050413 02:13]: > > > > > 1) What should I do in such situation? > > > Write a BUG report against the package

Re: Sources with missing dependencies

2005-04-13 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Alexander, Am 2005-04-13 11:48:53, schrieb Alexander Schmehl: > * Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050413 02:13]: > > > 1) What should I do in such situation? > > Write a BUG report against the package ? > > Yes, missing build-dependencies (or to be more correct: All FTBFS-bugs

Re: Sources with missing dependencies

2005-04-13 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050413 02:13]: > 1) What should I do in such situation? > Write a BUG report against the package ? Yes, missing build-dependencies (or to be more correct: All FTBFS-bugs (Fails to build from source)) are Release Critical. If possible, try the plain p

Re: Sources with missing dependencies

2005-04-13 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > P.S.: If only I knew a way to use pbuilder with svn-buildpackage. :( I haven't used svn-buildpackage for some time, but AFAIR, svn-buildpackage --svn-builder=pdebuild works. Marc -- $_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever

Re: Sources with missing dependencies

2005-04-13 Thread Christoph Haas
Moin, Michelle... On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:13:26AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > for some hours I have tried to compile a SARGE source under SARGE > with: > > 8< > SARGE base-install > apt-get install build-essential fakeroot > > apt-get build

Sources with missing dependencies

2005-04-12 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello, for some hours I have tried to compile a SARGE source under SARGE with: 8< SARGE base-install apt-get install build-essential fakeroot apt-get build-dep apt-get source cd $EDIT debian/changelog dpkg-buildpackage ... 8<-