On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 03:22:16AM +, Wayne Nguyen wrote:
> Hello Debian Mentors,
>
> I have uploaded the real-time-translator package to mentors.debian.net and am
> seeking a sponsor to review and provide feedback. The package can be found
> through this URL: https://mentors.debian.net/pack
Hello Debian Mentors,
I have uploaded the real-time-translator package to mentors.debian.net and am
seeking a sponsor to review and provide feedback. The package can be found
through this URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/real-time-translator/ .
I would greatly appreciate any guidance to
From: Emilio Scattoni
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: RFS: stan
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stan".
* Package name: stan
Version : 1.1.2-1
Upstream Author : [Giampaolo Tomassoni ]
* URL : [http://sourceforge.net/projects/stan/
On Friday 30 June 2006 20:43, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Often, changelog entries explain why certain technical packaging
> decisions were made (for instance, Build-Depend on "foo >= $version"
> because of $reason). These entries are definitely useful, even if they
> happened before the first release
Often, changelog entries explain why certain technical packaging
decisions were made (for instance, Build-Depend on "foo >= $version"
because of $reason). These entries are definitely useful, even if they
happened before the first release uploaded to the Debian archive.
--
Florent
--
To UNSUBS
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 11:49 +0300, Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote:
> The history in package indicates that there has been work going on
> before the package was added to Debian. The history documents the
> changes and gives indication of overall activity and competence the
> package was previously han
* Thu 2006-06-22 Thijs Kinkhorst
* Message-Id: 1150991711.6266.11.camel AT darwin.os9.nl
> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 22:31 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
>> * On the first upload, debian/changelog should have just one entry.
>> This is somewhat clumsy if you have a history of this package in
>> you
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 22:31 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > * On the first upload, debian/changelog should have just one entry.
> > This is somewhat clumsy if you have a history of this package in
> > your private/local reposito
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I'm not sure about a specific incident, but in general I'd say that
> for an otherwise unreleased package, more than one changelog entry
> is quite redundant. There's no reason to bother people with the
> different versions that never left your hard dri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:31:46PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:36:59AM +, Alan Baghumian wrote:
>>> * Package name : xfardic
>> First, it would be nice if the subject could contain the pack
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 22:31 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> * On the first upload, debian/changelog should have just one entry.
> This is somewhat clumsy if you have a history of this package in
> your private/local repository (like me with debs of kbtin on
> SourceForge), but I remember someon
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:31:46PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:36:59AM +, Alan Baghumian wrote:
> > * Package name : xfardic
>
> First, it would be nice if the subject could contain the package's
> name. Perhaps the m.d.n boilerplate could include it.
Good h
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:36:59AM +, Alan Baghumian wrote:
> * Package name: xfardic
First, it would be nice if the subject could contain the package's
name. Perhaps the m.d.n boilerplate could include it.
The big four tests:
* lintian:
I'm afraid there are four issues, all in
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xfardic".
* Package name : xfardic
Version : 0.7.5+cvs20060604-2
Upstream Author : Alan Baghumian, Armen Baghumian
* URL : http://sf.net/projects/xfardic/
* License
Hello:
I'd like to request for someone to sponsor the following unofficial
packages I have: snes9express (1.39-beta) - a GUI frontend for SNES9x
(as far as I know this is still an orphaned package); and visualboy
advance (a gameboy/gameboy color/gameboy advance emulator for Linux).
The said packa
Hello:
I'd like to request for someone to sponsor the following unofficial
packages I have: snes9express (1.39-beta) - a GUI frontend for SNES9x
(as far as I know this is still an orphaned package); and visualboy
advance (a gameboy/gameboy color/gameboy advance emulator for Linux).
The said packa
> Does simulpic do anything that gpsim doesn't? gpsim is in active
> development, and supports many pic chips.
no, it doesnt. however, this is a much simpler software to use and
understand. also, the system is well-written and clear. one can use
Simulpic as a basis for building more sophisticate
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>i noticed that the 16F84 simulator Simulpic has been orphaned by its
>previous maintainer Sam Tardieu.
>i would like to maintain this package as i have used it quite extensively
Does simulpic do anything that gpsim doesn't? gpsim is in
> Does simulpic do anything that gpsim doesn't? gpsim is in active
> development, and supports many pic chips.
no, it doesnt. however, this is a much simpler software to use and
understand. also, the system is well-written and clear. one can use
Simulpic as a basis for building more sophisticate
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>i noticed that the 16F84 simulator Simulpic has been orphaned by its
>previous maintainer Sam Tardieu.
>i would like to maintain this package as i have used it quite extensively
Does simulpic do anything that gpsim doesn't? gpsim is in
Hi,
i noticed that the 16F84 simulator Simulpic has been orphaned by its
previous maintainer Sam Tardieu.
i would like to maintain this package as i have used it quite extensively
and studied the source code. i noticed that it is simulating 16c84, an
obsolete device. microchip has replaced thi
Hi,
i noticed that the 16F84 simulator Simulpic has been orphaned by its
previous maintainer Sam Tardieu.
i would like to maintain this package as i have used it quite extensively
and studied the source code. i noticed that it is simulating 16c84, an
obsolete device. microchip has replaced thi
22 matches
Mail list logo
