Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am packaging a package - A - which conflicts with only some files in
> another package - B - (A depends on the rest of B's files). If A also
> contained the files in B with which it conflicts, I think I would tag A
> Replaces: B and be done; but A doesn't contai
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:21:59PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am packaging a package - A - which conflicts with only some files in
> another package - B - (A depends on the rest of B's files). If A also
> contained the files in B with which it conflicts, I think I would tag A
> Replaces
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:21:59PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am packaging a package - A - which conflicts with only some files in
> another package - B - (A depends on the rest of B's files). If A also
> contained the files in B with which it conflicts, I think I would tag A
> Replaces
I am packaging a package - A - which conflicts with only some files in
another package - B - (A depends on the rest of B's files). If A also
contained the files in B with which it conflicts, I think I would tag A
Replaces: B and be done; but A doesn't contain these files, it simply
conflicts wi
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am packaging a package - A - which conflicts with only some files in
> another package - B - (A depends on the rest of B's files). If A also
> contained the files in B with which it conflicts, I think I would tag A
> Replaces: B and be done; but A doesn't contai
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:21:59PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am packaging a package - A - which conflicts with only some files in
> another package - B - (A depends on the rest of B's files). If A also
> contained the files in B with which it conflicts, I think I would tag A
> Replaces
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:21:59PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am packaging a package - A - which conflicts with only some files in
> another package - B - (A depends on the rest of B's files). If A also
> contained the files in B with which it conflicts, I think I would tag A
> Replaces
I am packaging a package - A - which conflicts with only some files in
another package - B - (A depends on the rest of B's files). If A also
contained the files in B with which it conflicts, I think I would tag A
Replaces: B and be done; but A doesn't contain these files, it simply
conflicts wi
8 matches
Mail list logo