Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

2001-09-14 Thread Andres Seco Hernandez
Hi El 13 Sep 2001 a las 04:47PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson escribio: > Quoting Andres Seco Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [13 Sep-01 14:46]: > > I can't realize why some people is proccesed before other, that is, why > > somebody overtakes others? > > The delay for some people (and esp. the lack of

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

2001-09-14 Thread Andres Seco Hernandez
Hi El 13 Sep 2001 a las 04:47PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson escribio: > Quoting Andres Seco Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [13 Sep-01 14:46]: > > I can't realize why some people is proccesed before other, that is, why > > somebody overtakes others? > > The delay for some people (and esp. the lack of

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

2001-09-14 Thread Andres Seco Hernandez
Hi all El 13 Sep 2001 a las 06:40PM +0200, Gergely Nagy escribio: > Because the DAM processess people in the order he likes, it is > entirely up to him. It is not documented anywhere that people will be > processed in any order, and I think that's good. > > Just be patient, and wait, as most of t

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

2001-09-13 Thread Andres Seco Hernandez
Hi all El 13 Sep 2001 a las 06:40PM +0200, Gergely Nagy escribio: > Because the DAM processess people in the order he likes, it is > entirely up to him. It is not documented anywhere that people will be > processed in any order, and I think that's good. > > Just be patient, and wait, as most of

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

2001-09-13 Thread Gergely Nagy
Because the DAM processess people in the order he likes, it is entirely up to him. It is not documented anywhere that people will be processed in any order, and I think that's good. Just be patient, and wait, as most of the people do. -- Gergely Nagy \ mhp/|8] pgp4d5tinT5a0.pgp Description: PG

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

2001-09-13 Thread Stefan Alfredsson
Quoting Andres Seco Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [13 Sep-01 14:46]: > This is an example: > > Gustavo Franco AM recomends to DAM on 2001-08-30 > but no account created today (2001-09-13). > Ludovic Drolez AM recomends to DAM on 2001-08-20 > account created on 2001-08-22 > > I can't realize

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

2001-09-13 Thread Gergely Nagy
Because the DAM processess people in the order he likes, it is entirely up to him. It is not documented anywhere that people will be processed in any order, and I think that's good. Just be patient, and wait, as most of the people do. -- Gergely Nagy \ mhp/|8] PGP signature

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

2001-09-13 Thread Stefan Alfredsson
Quoting Andres Seco Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [13 Sep-01 14:46]: > This is an example: > > Gustavo Franco AM recomends to DAM on 2001-08-30 > but no account created today (2001-09-13). > Ludovic Drolez AM recomends to DAM on 2001-08-20 > account created on 2001-08-22 > > I can't realiz

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

2001-09-13 Thread Ganesan R
> "Andres" == Andres Seco Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have seen some new applicants status, and some applicants have been > recommended to DAM before others but some of this last have their account > created before the others. > This is an example: > Gustavo Franco AM recomen

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

2001-09-13 Thread Andres Seco Hernandez
I am sorry, the previous example was not good: Gustavo Franco AM recomends to DAM on 2001-08-30 but no account created today (2001-09-13). Romain Lerallut AM reomands to DAM on 2001-09-01 account created on 2001-09-03 Johann Botha AM recomends to DAM on 2001-07-06 but no account created t

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

2001-09-13 Thread Ganesan R
> "Andres" == Andres Seco Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have seen some new applicants status, and some applicants have been > recommended to DAM before others but some of this last have their account > created before the others. > This is an example: > Gustavo Franco AM recome

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

2001-09-13 Thread Andres Seco Hernandez
I am sorry, the previous example was not good: Gustavo Franco AM recomends to DAM on 2001-08-30 but no account created today (2001-09-13). Romain Lerallut AM reomands to DAM on 2001-09-01 account created on 2001-09-03 Johann Botha AM recomends to DAM on 2001-07-06 but no account created

Re: new maintainers

2000-01-02 Thread Pedro Guerreiro
On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 11:47:52PM +, Pedro Guerreiro wrote: > In the meantime, I package some stuff, and I'm still looking for a sponsor > to them (hint, hint). There are two packages that I think should be useful to > potato: glilo (a gtk+ configuration utility for lilo) and pharmacy (a gnom

Re: new maintainers

2000-01-01 Thread Pedro Guerreiro
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 10:28:01AM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 10:51:40PM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I joined Debian at May 23, this year (1999). I know at least one > > new maintainer who joined at June, IIRC. Old New Maintainer Team > > did work at that